The Vendetta Against Atlantid

[Immanenz]

You claim something- people will question it if they see any reason for doing so. Pretty basic human discours.

People critique this term because its used on people who do not look alike, i guess- there will be many more reasons not to like it if you are searching for reasons.


Just like that "Atlanto Med + Keltic Nordic" claim. Who invented even that Keltic Nordid? It was "Keltic" in Hooton, who seperated it from "Atlantid" aka his "Nordic-Mediterranean", and Keltic Nordic by. Coon. Some authors used Atlantid as "Mediterranean + Cromagnid", but it seems Hootons definition became prevelant but not in exact way (as people will use North Atlanitd/Pontid as well).

[Eurafricanid]

You claim something- people will question it if they see any reason for doing so. Pretty basic human discours.

People critique this term because its used on people who do not look alike, i guess- there will be many more reasons not to like it if you are searching for reasons.


Just like that "Atlanto Med + Keltic Nordic" claim. Who invented even that Keltic Nordid? It was "Keltic" in Hooton, who seperated it from "Atlantid" aka his "Nordic-Mediterranean", and Keltic Nordic by. Coon. Some authors used Atlantid as "Mediterranean + Cromagnid", but it seems Hootons definition became prevelant but not in exact way (as people will use North Atlanitd/Pontid as well).

If you pay attencion to what I wrote, you'll see that I never claimed anything, I just said that

as a mix of Atlanto-Med and Keltic Nordid, I don't see a better name for it

, where's the claim? Same for the North Atlantid, I said

it being, a mixture of Keltic-Nordid and Atlantid, it doesn't have to have something do with the Atlantic facade

, where is the claim here? I literally just said that the names fit the types, I didn't claim anything.
But thanks for (part, I guess of) the explanation I was hoping to get.

[Eurafricanid]

I (again) don't think any athropologist said that, and I didn't claim anything, various athropologists gave a lot of different names to a lot of phenotypes, I just said that the names matched the phenotypes, did you get it now?

[Eurafricanid]

george montandon explains it:

jan czekanowski explains it:

Thanks for this, I coudn't finding it.

[lei.talk]

I (again) don't think any anthropologist said that, and I didn't claim anything...do you get it now?

why would you post text
that lacked any correspondence to reality

...various athropologists gave a lot of different names to a lot of phenotypes...

can you provide any examples
or is this an other case of you not making any claims

...I just said that the names matched the phenotypes...

in fact,
the pairs of phenotypes you posted
do not compose the phenotype you claimed "didn't claim".

you have — repeatedly — been provided authoritative sources
in url-links. why have you not utilised them
to improve your knowledge?

why merely echo
the baseless opinions of one's e-peers

(who are - in turn - merely echoing the baseless opinions
of their e-peers - who quote a face-less poseur
that never read the text or any scientific papers)?

[lei.talk]

Thanks for this, I couldn't finding it.

[Immanenz]

I (again) don't think any athropologist said that, and I didn't claim anything, various athropologists gave a lot of different names to a lot of phenotypes, I just said that the names matched the phenotypes, did you get it now?

Very easy explanation: I say "My name is Joe Brian" i automatically claim that as well.

[Eurafricanid]

Very easy explanation: I say "My name is Joe Brian" i automatically claim that as well.

Right! Now show me in my text, with context, where did I say that it had to be named like that, I literally used names that were already beeing used and said that they fit them well, how is that a claim?

[Eurafricanid]

As I said thank you, I couldn't find it (sorry for the spelling mistake)

and I also didn't think of searching for subnordic. It just didn't come to my mind that it could be spelled that way, sorry for that, I guess .

[Eurafricanid]

why would you post text
that lacked any correspondence to reality

What? I literally only said: If it's a mix of these two phenotypes ((Keltic) Nordid and Atlanto-Med), the name "Atlantid" makes sense, I didn't say it has to have that name, I just couldn't understand why it can't also have that name, since it's already beeing used.

can you provide any examples
or is this an other case of you not making any claims

How is that a case of me not making claims? But yeah, of course I can, ex: Ibero-Insular by Eickstedt is supposed to be the same phenotype as Small Mediterranean by Biasutti and, yet they have different names, that's what I was saying, if you didn't understand.

in fact,
the pairs of phenotypes you posted
do not compose the phenotype you claimed "didn't claim".

So the Nordo-Med, or Nordic-Mediterranean or Proto-Atlantid (whatever is it's name) isn't a mix of Keltic Nordid and Atlantid? Because I was using this page, as it's (one of) the source(s) of the physicalanthropologywiki.fandom.com page for Atlantid, I wasn't making claims.
https://www.theapricity.com/snpa/rg-paleo.htm

you have — repeatedly — been provided authoritative sources
in url-links. why have you not utilised them
to improve your knowledge?

???

why merely echo
the baseless opinions of one's e-peers
(who are - in turn - merely echoing the baseless opinions
of their e-peers - who quote a face-less poseur
that never read the text or any scientific papers)?

What peers did I echo?