Will the EU finally sign a trade deal with South America?

[Your Old Comrade]

Las Malvinas isn't my problem either, nor the problem of British people - it's only a problem for the globalist elites as they're the only ones profiting from the oil there. (They'll pretend to the masses that it's a patriotic act to defend the govt on this issues - but that's only because they want to use people as pawns to fight for the globalist elites interests.)

And the people themselves would have a say in it, and that's the only voice that counts. And they choose to stay with the UK.

[♥ Lily ♥]

And the people themselves would have a say in it, and that's the only voice that counts. And they choose to stay with the UK.

The UK government persuaded a few thousand British colonists to live in Las Malvinas in order to secure the pro UK vote. What a farce.

But the ironic thing is that the islanders in Las Malvinas are now upset that the greedy UK government aren't allowing them any shares in the oil industry there. They now realise that they're being used as pawns.

Same with the thousands of reported homeless British veterans who now sleep on our streets;- the UK govt used them as disposable pawns to fight for the elites interests, and then discards them afterwards.

I've seen plenty of videos showing homeless British veterans on the streets - and I've seen it with my own eyes in London too.

I once saw a young former British soldier with no legs (they'd both been amputated,) who was angrily pushing himself with his hands along the ground on a makeshift board with some small wheels attached, and he was scavaging through bin bags on the street for food. It was a disturbing sight.

[Your Old Comrade]

The UK government persuaded a few thousand British colonists to live in Las Malvinas in order to secure the pro UK vote. What a farce.

But the ironic thing is that the islanders in Las Malvinas are now upset that the greedy UK government aren't allowing them any shares in the oil industry there. They now realise that they're being used as pawns.

Same with the thousands of reported homeless British veterans who now sleep on our streets;- the UK govt used them as pawns, and then discards them afterwards.

I've seen plenty of videos showing homeless British veterans on the streets - and I've seen it with my own eyes in London too.

I once saw a young former British soldier with no legs, who was angrily pushing himself along the ground on a makeshift board with wheels attached, and he was scavaging through bin bags on the street for food. It was a disturbing sight.

Those are your internal issues, but the facts are the facts: their people have spoken.

[♥ Lily ♥]

their people have spoken.

Idiot. It's like talking to a brick wall with you.

[Your Old Comrade]

Idiot. It's like talking to a brick wall with you.

It's called being principled. If you can't accept their vote, then why should one accept the Brexit vote. The people have spoken, and then they pay a price. Nothing is ever for free.

[♥ Lily ♥]

It's called being principled. If you can't accept their vote, then why should one accept the Brexit vote. The people have spoken, and then they pay a price. Nothing is ever for free.

If we moved British colonists to take over the Netherlands, and then held a vote on whether they want to remain under UK rule, you'd be fine with that?!

The British are the indigenous people to the British Isles, so you can't conflate our vote for independence from the EU empire with a few thousand colonists living on the other side of the planet in Las Malvinas - who aren't the native people.

[Your Old Comrade]

If we moved British colonists to take over the Netherlands, and then held a vote on whether they want to remain under UK rule, you'd be fine with that?!

The British are the indigenous people to the British Isles, so you can't conflate our vote for independence from the EU empire with a few thousand colonists living on the other side of the planet in Las Malvinas - who aren't the native people.

They were there before Argentina even existed, and there were no peoples on those islands. Apples and pears. The name Malvinas only came later out of spite. The ones who discovered them.., were the French.

[Jacques de Imbelloni]

At this moment, Argentina is in an electoral year. The two main candidates are the Peronist Party and a center-right coalition. The peronists have always defended strong policies of protectionism in trade.
If the coalition of "Juntos por el Cambio" wins the elections, there may be a possibility, but you have to think that Brazil is now ruled by the PT, who are left-wing win populists.

[Sebastianus Rex]

Actually not. That is the Dutch government acting on its accord by trying to be more Catholic than the Pope and using different measurements. Across the border in Belgium and Germany, there is no issue. The blame for that problem solely and completely rests on the now defunct Rutte government, who had been leaning their ears too much to the fact-free living Greens.

The Netherlands was chosen long ago to be the crash test dummy for several globalist experiments, this is not new and does not depend on a specific government.The climate agenda is being implemented and new rules will be disastrous for the European farmers. They have told us the same when China entered the World Trade Organization in 2001, it would not lead to the deindustrialization of the EU etc.

There is no way European agriculture will not be heavily affected with this deal, they don't play even by the same rules regarding pesticide, chemical and quality controls. Besides, the workforce costs cheap over there.

As long prime Argentinian/Uruguay meat keeps coming in at a moderate cost I'm OK but I'm aware of the medium/long term consequences.

[Your Old Comrade]

The Netherlands was chosen long ago to be the crash test dummy for the globalist experiments, this is not new and does not depend on a specific government.The climate agenda is being implemented and new rules will be disastrous for the European farmers, besides they told the same when China entered the World Trade Organization in 2001, it would not lead to the deindustrialization of the EU etc.

There is no way European agriculture will not be heavily affected with this deal, they don't play even by the same rules regarding pesticide, chemical and quality controls. Besides, the workforce costs cheap over there.

As long prime Argentinian/Uruguay meat keeps coming in at a moderate cost I'm OK but I'm aware of the medium/long term consequences.

I would really like to know the source for that claim, as I have seen it pop up.. But only in far right circles. Do you know the source, so I can check it ?