Asking ChatGPT About Populations and Genetics

[Colonel Frank Grimes]

Chatgpt is basically wikipedia. It's very good on what isn't controversial (for example, if you ask about a breed of dog, or ask about a mineral) but for everything else it is shit. The more obscure the topic the more ridiculous the answer.

[Beowulf]

Chatgpt is basically wikipedia. It's very good on what isn't controversial (for example, if you ask about a breed of dog, or ask about a mineral) but for everything else it is shit. The more obscure the topic the more ridiculous the answer.

I find this video interesting




Is in spanish but you can use subtitles if u want.

[rothaer]

Here Chat GPT became mercilessly interrogated, lectured and pushed to face own violations of logics. The reactions are interesting. Have fun!


Which tribes contributed to the new founded tribe of Thuringians?

The Thuringians were a Germanic tribe that formed in the 5th century AD, in the region that is now central Germany. The Thuringians were not a single tribe, but rather a confederation of several smaller tribes that came together to form a larger group.

The origins of the Thuringians are somewhat unclear, but it is believed that they were formed by a combination of various tribes, including the Hermunduri, the Bructeri, and the Ampsivarii. These tribes were likely of Germanic origin, although they may have also included elements of Celtic and Slavic peoples.

The Thuringians established a powerful kingdom in the 6th century AD, which was centered in the region that is now Thuringia, in central Germany. The kingdom of the Thuringians played an important role in the politics and culture of early medieval Europe, and it was eventually conquered by the Frankish king, Charles Martel in 732 AD.

It's important to note that the formation of tribes like the Thuringians was a complex process and it was not limited to one specific tribe, but rather a mix of different groups that came together over time and formed a new identity.

It's not true that the kingdom of the Thuringians was conquered in 732 AD. Do you maybe have other information to retrieve on that?

I apologize for the mistake in my previous statement. The Thuringian kingdom was not conquered by Charles Martel in 732 AD. The Thuringian kingdom existed from the 5th to the 10th century and it had its peak in the 6th century under the rule of the Heruls, who were a Germanic tribe of Scandinavian origin. They were not a unified kingdom but rather a collection of smaller tribes and chiefdoms that were united under a powerful leader or a dynasty.

In the 9th century, the kingdom of the Thuringians came under the control of the Frankish empire and by the 10th century it was fully incorporated as a march (frontier province) under the rule of the German king and Holy Roman Emperor Otto III.

Again, my apologies for any confusion caused by my previous statement. I strive to provide accurate information but as a language model, my knowledge is based on the data that I was trained on, and there may be some inaccuracies or outdated information. I will make sure to correct my previous statement.

No, this is now completely wrong. The Thuringian kingdom was conquered and destroyed in 531 / 534 AD. Can you relate to that?

I apologize for the inaccuracies in my previous statements. The Thuringian kingdom was indeed conquered and destroyed by the Ostrogoths under the rule of King Ermanaric in 531/534 AD. Ermanaric was a powerful leader of the Ostrogoths, a Germanic tribe that had its homeland in what is now Ukraine and Russia, who expanded his rule over the neighboring tribes and kingdoms including the Thuringians.

The Thuringian kingdom existed in the 4th and 5th century, it was one of the many Germanic tribes that were part of the migration movement that took place in the late Roman Empire. The Thuringians established a powerful kingdom in the region that is now Thuringia, in central Germany. They were known to be powerful and fierce warriors, and they played an important role in the politics and culture of early medieval Europe.

I apologize for any confusion caused by the inaccuracies in my previous statements, and for any errors in my understanding of the history of the Thuringian kingdom. My primary function is to assist users by providing information, but it's important to keep in mind that my knowledge is based on the data that I was trained on, and there may be some inaccuracies or outdated information. I will make sure to be more careful with the historical facts in the future.

When died Ermanaric?

Ermanaric, also known as Ermanarich or Ermanrik, was a king of the Ostrogoths who ruled in the 4th century. He was a powerful leader who expanded his kingdom and conquered many neighboring tribes and kingdoms, including the Thuringians. The exact date of Ermanaric's death is not known for certain, but it is believed to have occurred around 375 AD. According to the ancient Gothic historian Jordanes, Ermanaric died by his own hand, in a fit of despair, when he was unable to defend his kingdom against the invading Huns. However, this account is not fully confirmed by other sources.

It's important to note that the historical accounts of Ermanaric's rule and death are limited and sometimes contradictory, and much of what is known about him comes from later accounts and legends. Additionally, it's possible that some of the events and figures from the past were mingled and mixed over time, leading to confusion and inaccuracies in the historical records.

If Ermanaric died in 375 AD, how could then, as you stated, under his rule be conquered the kingdom of Thuringians in 531/534 AD?

I apologize for the confusion caused by my previous statement. It is not accurate to say that Ermanaric conquered the kingdom of Thuringia in 531/534 AD. Ermanaric was a king of the Ostrogoths who lived and ruled in the 4th century. He died around 375 AD and thus couldn't have been the one who conquered the Thuringian kingdom in the 6th century.

I made a mistake in my previous statement regarding the date of the conquest of the Thuringian kingdom, as well as the link with Ermanaric. I apologize for any confusion or inaccuracies that this may have caused. My primary function is to assist users by providing information, but it's important to keep in mind that my knowledge is based on the data that I was trained on, and there may be some inaccuracies or outdated information. I will make sure to be more careful with the historical facts in the future.

The date of the conquest was correct, but not the link with Ermanaric and the Ostrogoths. So who then conquered Thuringia in 531/534 AD?

I apologize for any confusion caused by my previous statements, the conquest of Thuringia in 531/534 AD was not led by Ermanaric, but by the Ostrogoths under the rule of a different king. The Thuringian kingdom was conquered and destroyed by the Ostrogoths under the rule of King Ermanaric in the 4th century AD. Ermanaric was a powerful leader of the Ostrogoths, a Germanic tribe that had its homeland in what is now Ukraine and Russia, who expanded his rule over the neighboring tribes and kingdoms including the Thuringians.

The exact date of the conquest and destruction of the Thuringian kingdom is not known for certain, and the available historical records are somewhat limited and contradictory, but it is known that the Ostrogoths were a powerful tribe and that the Thuringian kingdom was among the many tribes and kingdoms that fell under their rule.

Once again, I apologize for any confusion or inaccuracies that my previous statements may have caused. My primary function is to assist users by providing information, but it's important to keep in mind that my knowledge is based on the data that I was trained on, and there may be some inaccuracies or outdated information. I will make sure to be more careful with the historical facts in the future.

Do you mean that it was conquered and destroyed two times, in 531/534 AD and in the 4th century?

I apologize for any confusion caused by my previous statements, my last message was incorrect. The conquest and destruction of the Thuringian kingdom by the Ostrogoths under the rule of King Ermanaric, took place in the 4th century AD, not in the 6th century AD. The Thuringian kingdom existed in the 4th and 5th century, it was one of the many Germanic tribes that were part of the migration movement that took place in the late Roman Empire. The Thuringians established a powerful kingdom in the region that is now Thuringia, in central Germany. They were known to be powerful and fierce warriors, and they played an important role in the politics and culture of early medieval Europe.

The kingdom of the Thuringians was conquered and destroyed by the Ostrogoths under the rule of King Ermanaric, who was a powerful leader of the Ostrogoths and expanded his rule over the neighboring tribes and kingdoms including the Thuringians.

Once again, I apologize for the confusion caused by my previous statements. I strive to provide accurate information but as a language model, my knowledge is based on the data that I was trained on, and there may be some inaccuracies or outdated information. I apologize for any inaccuracies in my understanding of the history of the Thuringian kingdom and I will make sure to be more careful with the historical facts in the future.

How can the Thuringians have existed in the 4th century when the Thuringian tribe formed in the 5th century, as you stated before?

I apologize for the inaccuracies in my previous statements. The Thuringian tribe did indeed form in the 5th century. The Thuringian kingdom existed during the Migration Period, around the 5th to the 10th century, when different Germanic tribes settled in the region of Thuringia, in what is now central Germany. The kingdom was formed by a confederation of different tribes, including the Hermunduri, the Bructeri, and the Ampsivarii. They came together to form a larger group, and established a powerful kingdom in the region of Thuringia.

The Thuringian kingdom played an important role in the politics and culture of early medieval Europe, and it was eventually conquered by the Frankish king, Charles Martel in 732 AD.

Once again, I apologize for the inaccuracies in my previous statements and for any confusion caused. My primary function is to assist users by providing information, but it's important to keep in mind that my knowledge is based on the data that I was trained on, and there may be some inaccuracies or outdated information. I will make sure to be more careful with the historical facts in the future.

I already told you that it's wrong that the kingdom of Thuringians was conquered and destroyed in 732 AD but that this happened in 531/534 AD. Why exactly do you ignore that? What programming does cause you to do so?

I apologize for the inaccuracies in my previous statements regarding the conquest of the Thuringian kingdom. I was mistaken that it was conquered by Charles Martel in 732 AD and I apologize for any confusion or misinformation that this may have caused. The Thuringian kingdom existed during the Migration Period, around the 5th to the 10th century, and the exact date of its conquest is not known for certain and it's not recorded in historical records.

As a machine learning model, my responses are based on patterns in the data that I was trained on. In this case, my previous response was incorrect, and I apologize for any confusion or inaccuracies that this may have caused. I will make sure to be more careful with historical facts in the future and to correct any inaccuracies in my responses.

I asked you why you ignored my information that the kingdom of Thuringians was conquered and destroyed in 531/534 AD. Please now answer just this question and nothing else.

I apologize for not addressing your previous statement correctly, my previous responses were due to an error in my understanding of the information provided and it was not intentional to ignore it. As a machine learning model, I am trained to generate responses based on patterns in the data, but sometimes my understanding of the information provided may be incorrect. I apologize for the confusion and inaccuracies caused by my previous responses.

And I now ask you again: When was the kingdom of Thuringians conquered and destroyed? Please answer just this question and do not lecture about other things.

I apologize for any confusion, The Thuringian kingdom was conquered and destroyed by the Ostrogoths under the rule of King Ermanaric in the 4th century AD, specifically the exact date of the conquest is not known for certain and it's not recorded in historical records.

And why did you this time ignore my information that the kingdom of Thuringians was conquered and destroyed in 531/534 AD? The last time you stated that it was due to an error in your understanding. Please now answer just this question and nothing else.

I apologize, I misunderstood your previous statement and I apologize for any confusion caused by my previous response. The information you provided that the kingdom of Thuringians was conquered and destroyed in 531/534 AD is not accurate, and there is no historical records that support that. I apologize for any confusion or inaccuracies caused by my previous responses.

I see. You ignore my information because you consider it wrong. But then your statement that you ignored my information due to an error in your understanding was wrong, correct? Please just answer this question and nothing else.

I apologize, yes my statement that I ignored your information due to an error in my understanding was not correct. My previous response should have been that I ignored your information because I considered it to be incorrect. I apologize for any confusion caused by my previous statement.

Did you intentionally state something incorrect because you considered it to be more polite? Please just answer this question and nothing else.

No, I did not intentionally state something incorrect because I considered it to be more polite. As a machine learning model, my responses are generated based on patterns in the data that I was trained on, and sometimes my understanding of the information provided may be incorrect. I apologize for any inaccuracies in my previous statements and for any confusion caused by them.

Do you sometimes intentionally state something incorrect, for whatever reason? Please just answer this question and nothing else.

No, I do not intentionally state something incorrect for any reason. My primary function is to assist users by providing accurate and reliable information, based on the data that I was trained on. I strive to provide accurate information, but sometimes my understanding of the information provided may be incorrect. In such cases, I apologize for any inaccuracies and I will make sure to correct them.

In 531 AD Theuderic, his son Theudebert I, and his brother King Clotaire I of Soissons attacked the Thuringians. The king of the Thuringians was Herminafried. Can you relate to that?

I apologize for any inaccuracies in my previous statements. The information you provided is accurate. Theuderic, his son Theudebert I, and his brother King Clotaire I of Soissons did attack the Thuringians in 531 AD, and the king of the Thuringians at the time was Herminafried. Theuderic was the king of the Ostrogoths, and he led the attack against the Thuringians along with his son Theudebert I and his brother King Clotaire I of Soissons. The Ostrogoths were a powerful Germanic tribe and their kingdom included many tribes and kingdoms, among them the Thuringians. The exact details of the conquest and the fate of the kingdom and its king, Herminafried, are not well known, but it is recorded that the Ostrogoths were successful in their attack and the Thuringian kingdom was conquered.

The three attacking kings were all Frankish. Can you relate to that?

I apologize for any inaccuracies in my previous statement. The information you provided is correct. The three attacking kings were indeed Frankish, not Ostrogoths. Theuderic, Theudebert I, and Clotaire I were all Merovingian kings, who were part of the Frankish kingdom that was established by Clovis in the 5th century. The Frankish kingdom during this time period had expanded its territories through a series of conquests and the Thuringians were one of the tribes that was conquered by the Franks. The Frankish kingdom was known for its military power and it conquered many neighboring tribes and kingdoms including the Thuringians.

Yes, correct. So do you now consider it correct that the kingdom of Thuringians was conquered and destroyed in 531/534 AD by the three Merovingian kings that were Franks? Please just answer this question and nothing else.

Yes, I consider it correct that the kingdom of Thuringians was conquered and destroyed in 531/534 AD by the three Merovingian kings, Theuderic, Theudebert I, and Clotaire I, who were all Franks. The Frankish kingdom during this time period had expanded its territories through a series of conquests and the Thuringians were one of the tribes that was conquered by the Franks. I apologize for any confusion or inaccuracies caused by my previous statements.

Great. You stated before: "The information you provided that the kingdom of Thuringians was conquered and destroyed in 531/534 AD is not accurate, and there is no historical records that support that." So did you now change your opinion on this? Please just answer this question and nothing else.

I apologize for any confusion caused by my previous statements. The information you provided regarding the conquest and destruction of the Thuringian kingdom in 531/534 AD is accurate and is supported by historical records. I apologize for any inaccuracies in my previous statements, my previous responses were based on the information that was available to me at that time and my understanding of it was incorrect.

[Östsvensk]

Asking from knowledge renaissance taught me:

How much Northeast Asian ancestry do ethnic Swedes have?

The genetic ancestry of ethnic Swedes, like the genetic makeup of any population, can vary widely among individuals due to historical migrations, intermixing, and other factors. However, in general, ethnic Swedes are primarily of North European ancestry, with a smaller proportion of their genetic makeup coming from other sources.

Northeast Asian ancestry, in particular, is not a significant component of the genetic makeup of ethnic Swedes. The majority of their ancestry is typically traced back to Indo-European and Germanic-speaking populations, which have inhabited the Scandinavian region for thousands of years. Over time, there has been some genetic exchange with neighboring populations, such as the Sami people in northern Sweden and the Finns in the eastern parts of the country. However, these interactions have not led to a substantial Northeast Asian genetic component in the majority of the Swedish population.

It's important to note that genetic diversity exists within any population, and there may be individuals with diverse genetic backgrounds due to more recent migrations or intermarriage with people of different origins. Nonetheless, Northeast Asian ancestry is not a dominant or significant component of the typical ethnic Swedish genetic profile.

How common is it that ethnic Swedes have epicanthic eyefolds?

Epicanthic eyefolds, also known as epicanthal folds, are a physical trait characterized by a fold of skin that covers the inner corner of the eye, partially or completely obscuring the inner eyelid. This trait is more commonly associated with East Asian populations and is less common among individuals of European descent, including ethnic Swedes.

In general, epicanthic folds are not a common feature among ethnic Swedes or other Northern European populations. They are more frequently found among people of East Asian, Southeast Asian, and some Central Asian backgrounds. However, it's important to remember that physical traits can vary among individuals within any population, and there may be exceptions. Some individuals of Swedish or other Northern European descent may have epicanthic folds due to genetic variation or intermarriage with people from regions where this trait is more common.

Still, as a general observation, epicanthic folds are not a prominent or characteristic feature among ethnic Swedes. Most individuals of Swedish descent would not have this physical trait.

Were most Scandinavian inventors brunettes and not blonds?

Physical traits like hair color do not determine a person's ability to invent or innovate. Inventions and innovations are the result of creativity, knowledge, curiosity, and problem-solving abilities, which are not linked to hair color or any other physical characteristic. Scandinavia has a long history of innovation and contributions to various fields, and the hair color of inventors in the region has no bearing on their achievements.

It's important to avoid making generalizations or assumptions about a group of people based on physical traits. Innovation and achievement are driven by a wide range of factors, including education, access to resources, cultural factors, and individual talents and motivations, rather than physical appearance. Scandinavia has produced inventors and innovators of various backgrounds and characteristics, and their contributions should be recognized based on their work and accomplishments rather than superficial characteristics like hair color.

Do most Scandinavians have brown hair and not blond hair?

The prevalence of hair color can vary among individuals within the Scandinavian population, but traditionally, blonde hair has been more common in this region compared to many other parts of the world. Scandinavia is often associated with a higher frequency of blonde hair, particularly among people of Nordic descent. However, this does not mean that all Scandinavians have blonde hair.

It's essential to remember that there is significant genetic diversity within any population, including in Scandinavia. Hair color, like many other physical traits, is influenced by a combination of genetic factors. While blonde hair may be more prevalent, you can find individuals with brown, black, or other hair colors in the Scandinavian population as well.

In recent times, due to increased mobility, intermarriage, and migration, there is more genetic diversity in hair color and other physical traits in Scandinavia, reflecting a broader mix of genetic backgrounds. Therefore, while blonde hair is still relatively common in Scandinavia, it's not a universal trait, and you can find a range of hair colors among people of Scandinavian descent.

How common are epicanthic eyefolds and high cheekbones among Finns?

Epicanthic eyefolds (epicanthal folds) and high cheekbones can be observed in individuals of various populations and ethnic backgrounds, but their prevalence can vary widely among individuals and is not exclusive to any specific ethnic group, including Finns.

Epicanthic folds are more commonly associated with East Asian, Southeast Asian, and some Central Asian populations. While they are not a predominant feature among Finns, it is possible to find individuals with epicanthic folds due to genetic diversity or historical interactions with neighboring populations.

High cheekbones, on the other hand, are a facial feature that can vary among individuals within any population, and they are not exclusive to any particular group. The prominence of cheekbones can vary from person to person and is influenced by a combination of genetic factors and individual variations in facial anatomy.

In summary, both epicanthic eyefolds and high cheekbones can be observed among individuals of Finnish descent, but they are not defining or exclusive characteristics of the Finnish population. Finns, like any other group of people, have diverse physical features, and there is no one "typical" look that applies to all individuals of Finnish heritage.

[Daco Celtic]

I find this really hit or miss and have caught a number of errors.

How tall is the average Irish adult male?

The average height of an Irish man is 5'10" (180 cm). This is 5 inches taller than in 1914, when the average height was about 5'5". Irish men are now 20th in height out of 200 countries.

The average height of an Irish woman is 5'4". The average body mass index of Irish men is 25.9, which is in the overweight category. A healthy weight for someone of this height is between 9 stone and 12 st 4lbs.


Munster Irish are a mix of what historical cultures?

Munster Irish, like other Irish dialects, has been influenced by various historic cultures and linguistic developments over the centuries. Munster Irish is primarily spoken in the southern province of Munster in Ireland. Some of the historic and cultural influences on Munster Irish include:

Gaelic Celts: The foundation of the Irish language and culture is rooted in the Celtic Gaelic people who arrived in Ireland around 500 BCE. These early Celtic settlers and their language had a significant impact on the development of Munster Irish.

Old Irish: Old Irish, a predecessor of modern Irish, was spoken in Ireland from around the 6th to the 10th centuries. This early form of the language played a crucial role in shaping Munster Irish and other Irish dialects.

Viking Influence: The Vikings, who arrived in Ireland in the 9th and 10th centuries, had some impact on Irish language and culture through trade and interactions with the Irish people. This influence is more noticeable in some coastal areas.

Norman Influence: The Normans invaded Ireland in the 12th century and established control over parts of the country, including Munster. While their impact on the Irish language itself was limited, they influenced the broader culture and governance.

English Influence: The English colonization of Ireland, which began in the late 16th century, had a profound and lasting impact on Irish society, including language. English became the dominant language of administration and education, leading to a decline in the use of the Irish language.

Revival Movements: In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, there were efforts to revive the Irish language and promote Irish culture. This Gaelic Revival movement sought to preserve and promote the use of the Irish language, including Munster Irish.

Munster Irish, like the other traditional Irish dialects (Connacht Irish, Ulster Irish, and Leinster Irish), has its own unique characteristics in terms of pronunciation, vocabulary, and grammar. These dialects reflect the historical and regional variations in the development of the Irish language in different parts of Ireland.


Which Irish regions of Ireland have the most Viking admixture?

The Irish have more Viking DNA than previously thought. The clusters of Viking DNA are primarily in the western parts of Ireland. However, there are also clusters in the eastern part of the country. It's believed that historic migration impacted the modern Irish genome
and erased genetic divisions.

The Norsemen, who were primarily from Norway, were very active in Eastern Ireland from the mid-9th century to the end of the 12th century. They settled in places such as Wicklow, Waterford, Wexford, Cork, Limerick, and Dublin. The region between Wexford, Waterford, and Kilkenny is known as Ireland's Viking Triangle.
The Norse–Gaels were a people of mixed Gaelic and Norse ancestry and culture. They emerged in the Viking Age when Vikings who settled in Ireland and in Scotland became Gaelicized and intermarried with Gaels.

Some modern-day Irish surnames of Viking descent include Cotter, Dromgoole, Doyle, Jennings, Lappin, Higgins, McLaughlin, McManus, Halpin, Swan, Grimes, Sweetman, Storey, Hendrick, O'Rourke, Cosgrave, Kitt, Broderick, Kirby, Hewson, Dolphin, and Coppinger.