0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,293 Given: 7,518 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 24,213 Given: 16,925 |
An excerpt from a brief analysis by the Center for Eastern Studies on a possible union:
"It is estimated that in the event of Moldova joining the EU, Romania would have to spend around €35 billion over the first five years alone on a wide range of adaptations (including infrastructure and administration) of the territory of present-day Moldova. Although support for reunification ranges between 70 and 80% in Romania, opinion polls also show an unwillingness to bear its financial costs. Romanian politicians tend to rhetorically support the idea, but do not put forward a specific plan for its implementation."
Source: https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje...cation-romania
This is a very superficial analysis without much data, but the tendency is always for these kinds of estimates to end up costing more than they originally projected. Absorbing a new territory (which is in reality a sovereign state with all its logistics, bureaucracy and dynamics) always entails immense challenges. The fact that East Germany's economy represents 15% of West Germany's does not portray what is actually spent annually on subsidies and funds, which amount to almost 40% of Germany's budget so in an optimistic scenario Moldova could account for around 12%-15% of Romania's budget (which is huge). I can even draw another parallel, not exactly identical but touching on some of the same points: Russia's annexation of Crimea. We can say that at a strategic level it is very advantageous to have control of the peninsula, but on the other hand it is a fact that since its annexation Crimea has become a drain on Kremlin funding, being a complete budgetary burden.
In my opinion, I think the best scenario for Moldova would be to remain independent and join the European Union (after fulfilling the goals and criteria for accession). Small states, when well managed, can progress swiftly and with less bureaucracy. I read your idea of transferring factories to Moldova, I think the future of Moldova would be more about becoming a tech hub like other small countries have successfully done (Ireland\Estonia). Moldova for its size will never be a big industrial and agricultural nation like Romania, it has to bet on education, services and innovative start ups. Even Romania is trying to become the Silicon Valley of the Balkans.
YDNA: R1b-L21 > DF13 > S1051 > FGC17906 > FGC17907 > FGC17866
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,293 Given: 7,518 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,041 Given: 3,151 |
According to some polls, around 40% of Moldovans would be pro union. And in Romania 31% would agree with it, if there was a referendum the next day. And 33% if the union would take place, one day in the future.
I believe only if some bigger event will happen (like fear of an invasion), the population of both countries would maybe become more pro unionist. But still, this would be forced and artificial union.
Last edited by Cybele; 09-20-2023 at 10:16 PM.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 15,364 Given: 9,902 |
I dont understand this GDP oriented thinking. The nation is not question of GDP or money, but family is family, poor members are also part of family tat belong to each other in good times or bad times.
The german unification was not qestion of GDP, but it was moral and national thing, and everyone is supported it, right and left. Family is more important than any money or GDP, this financial oriented mindset reminds me of prostitutes.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,095 Given: 1,038 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks