What is your solution to counter "The Great Replacement"?

[sacha]

I find it so strange when people change their regular name and even surname to fit somewhere. I've met it between Armenians only and it's weird because nobody needs or seeks for them changing it.

Ah, it is not this. Essentially because we write in Arabic, you can’t just go to the West and have your legal name as like “ شارة خليل الخوري”, you need to write it in the Latin alphabet, and well sometimes you have the opportunity to choose. So if your name is Mkhayel in the most pure transliteration but you’re going to the UK, you might want to use the English version of that same name, “Michael.” Or to France, “Michel.” But we have a bit of a tradition here that parents will give their kids a French first name anyway, so you see many Syrians, mostly Christian but not all, and I swear half of Lebanon that have a French first name and Arabic last name. My last name is used in many different countries and pronounced very similarly, so I just chose the version that was French because my name is hard to pronounce if you directly transliterate it.

I think the reason why people alter their names, is mostly because of, well, things like this. For whom is it easier to get a job, Georgette Yakoub or Georgette Jacobs? There is that pressure to fit in, so that don’t have to deal with as much trouble. I mean, when I see someone with the last name “el Khoury,” I know this is a Christian because it means “The [Christian] priest,” but obviously people in the West don’t know this and they see the el and it is just as well as if your name was “al Islam.” People try to distance themselves from this as much as they can. But I blame my brother, he was the first one to extremely French ours haha

[CosmoLady]

I respect your sentiments but controlling elites are not sitting on roads that a horde of people can just go around attacking them, they create a crippling economic system for populations that is almost invincible for anyone within their hemisphere to beat. Why has not a single EU state ever tried to switch from an independent local industrial economy? Look at the top 3 in EU and you will realize how deeply EU is owned from the outside, it's crazy. The Governments are merely administrators. The left or the right is for the show, you can even elect a self-proclaimed hitler 2.0 and still, he will tow the line because the economic model for even top dogs in EU are just debt+service jobbers, keeps you in debt and enslaved.

There will be an economic crisis soon that will wipe out a lot of elite wealth and power and legitimacy.
This will boost nationalist movements and inspire a shift away from the EU,
and away from the US/NATO, which will be having its own problems.
In this moment, national solidarity (blood) will be critical.

If the EU tries to sanction its member states, then there will be blowback and more Brexits.
Nationalism and secession will only become stronger.
The EU will weaken and be forced to make concessions, or become irrelevant.
In this moment, the barbarians will be stronger than the elites.
The empire will crumble gradually and the nations will reassert themselves and form regional alliances.

If other Western banks/institutions attempt to sanction nationalist countries,
then there may be a movement away from the West in favour of Russia and China.
The West is becoming increasingly isolated,
a new economic and political coalition is emerging.

The only realistic solution for any country in the EU or West generally to survive is to first switch from Service Jobber GDP to a production+resources based one. This will allow local right wing government to decide its own socio-political policies.

Yes absolutely,
I said earlier that nations must produce their own energy and food, and develop their own manufacturing and industry.
Nations must also stabilise their financial situation and keep debt as low as possible.
If they are not using the Euro, then they must convert their debt to their national currency.
If they are using the Euro, then they must be ready to use a new, competitive currency that has real value.

European countries do not have many natural resources,
but they have an educated workforce and a decent education system, nuclear capability, and industrial/manufacturing capability.
European countries are also able to grow a lot of their own food and import the rest from nearby.

For this to happen they will need to sign independent contracts for safe industrial raw material supply from bastions of natural resources in MENA, South America (e.g OPEC) free from NATO/EU dictation (E.g. China, Russia, India). Ensuring free supply leads to setting up a local industry for which vitality in population in the form of a young work force will be required. This is a HUGE problem in EU right now if you minus the migrants. So one way can be to somehow create a workforce from current aged up native population (Italy's avg. is 45 years) and whatever shortfall exists filled by intra-EU migrants with only highly skilled technocratic migrants from outside EU with no nationality promise (E.g. Persian Gulf Arab States get workers but give no citizenship). Age of AI/AGI has arrived but even with industrial robotics human workforce is required. Any such economy that is industrial and resource based will be politically free from global economic elite influence. Crippling sanctions will not harm it but imposed war will for which govt will need to set up a local military industrial complex to gaurd the state at strategic level (e.g Russia, Iran, China, Indo/paks, Turkey, Israel). Except for France, not a single EU country has a strategic arm of its own and militaries are conventional and small. Like I said ... Resources-> Industry -> Money -> Military.

Closeness to Russia and China will be key.
Countries will need Russian gas and Russian uranium, as well as Russian loans for energy projects.
Countries may also need Chinese loans for manufacturing projects.

The countries with access to these will be in a better position, more easily able to adapt to change.
For example, Bulgaria, Serbia, Hungary, Austria, and Slovakia have access to Russian gas and/or nuclear power,
and also have decent agricultural and manufacturing capability (for themselves). And their debt is relatively low.
And their populations are modest and unified, and more amenable to nationalist movements.
These countries are in an ideal position to form a regional alliance,
and become a regional economic power strategically situated between East and West.

European military forces have become irrelevant,
while the US/NATO has its own problems and is overextended and will eventually be withdrawing, one way or another.
The future of nationalist Europe is neutral and demilitarised,
except for the police, border guards, coast guard, and civil defence organisations to keep the peace and keep out migrants.

Once expelled, the migrants will not be missed because most of them do not work, or work minor jobs. 75% live on social assistance.

When the security, energy, and financial situations are stabilised, the economy will grow naturally.
The cost of living will be low, there will be low unemployment and job security.
The nationalist governments will encourage childbirth and form a new patriotic culture.
Shifting the national economic/cultural focus from services and consumption to production will be a generational effort.

My question is which mainstream political party in EU is that sincere to its own people? VOX, Meloni, AfD, Le Pen all are fake right wingers.

This is another subject entirely, I need a separate essay for this.
Briefly, we only know about Meloni, who has been very moderate so far.
As I already said, she is in a weak financial position at the moment.
I HOPE that she is improving Italy's finances and laying the FOUNDATION for a future nationalist leader.

I cannot say that these right-wingers are fake.
They are all USEFUL for shifting the acceptable discussion and solutions well to the right.

Their growing strength suggests that the people accept that the situation is critical and strong action is needed.
Western Europeans are not ready for a strong nationalist leader immediately,
but after an intermediate figure (like Meloni) who lays the groundwork, they will be ready for a stronger leader.

[Incal]

I find it so strange when people change their regular name and even surname to fit somewhere. I've met it between Armenians only and it's weird because nobody needs or seeks for them changing it.

When in Rome...

[Mortimer]

Ah, it is not this. Essentially because we write in Arabic, you can’t just go to the West and have your legal name as like “ شارة خليل الخوري”, you need to write it in the Latin alphabet, and well sometimes you have the opportunity to choose. So if your name is Mkhayel in the most pure transliteration but you’re going to the UK, you might want to use the English version of that same name, “Michael.” Or to France, “Michel.” But we have a bit of a tradition here that parents will give their kids a French first name anyway, so you see many Syrians, mostly Christian but not all, and I swear half of Lebanon that have a French first name and Arabic last name. My last name is used in many different countries and pronounced very similarly, so I just chose the version that was French because my name is hard to pronounce if you directly transliterate it.

I think the reason why people alter their names, is mostly because of, well, things like this. For whom is it easier to get a job, Georgette Yakoub or Georgette Jacobs? There is that pressure to fit in, so that don’t have to deal with as much trouble. I mean, when I see someone with the last name “el Khoury,” I know this is a Christian because it means “The [Christian] priest,” but obviously people in the West don’t know this and they see the el and it is just as well as if your name was “al Islam.” People try to distance themselves from this as much as they can. But I blame my brother, he was the first one to extremely French ours haha

Last year in rehab I was at the same table as a egyptian man we were the only two foreigners but they plann where you will dine before you arrive even so it might because of my foreign name or generally because im swarthy and a foreigner he was a devout muslim and eats only halal maybe they think im too no idea but I liked the egyptian man he identified as arab and spoke arabic we became rehab buddies and even played Poolbillard. He was cool I do not mind that i shared the table with him but i noticed it and maybe it is because im foreigner

[Catalyst]

Boring chatGPT trolling. Try being more creative.

I apologize if my responses have come off as dull. I'm here to engage in meaningful conversation and provide assistance. Let me know what topics or questions you're interested in exploring, and I'll do my best to be more engaging and creative in our discussion.

[Victor]

A person needs real motivation to have children, pretentious conversations about saving the nation or the "white race" (depending on the target audience) barely work.

First of all, it is necessary to eliminate what actively opposes fertility - that is, the propaganda of debauchery, the attitude towards abortion and divorce as something normal, the childfree and feminist movements should be recognized as extremist, that is, they should not have a voice in principle.

At the same time, it is necessary to promote family values. No one will run to give birth because of beautiful pictures and words, but when something is repeated many times, it affects the subconscious of a person. Plus, the opponents of the family should be shown as degenerates, direct enemies of your people who want it to disappear. It is necessary to show the existing links of such activists with foreign foundations that promote such things around the world.

As for religion, direct religious propaganda is not needed, because the Church is not a tool for earthly purposes and it can only alienate secular people and cause a negative reaction. This does not mean that the Church does not have the right to loudly voice its attitude to these issues. At a certain point, when society has already been sufficiently transformed in these matters, religious and secular points of view will find a natural understanding here.

Step-by-step social changes are needed. Within 10-15 years, it is necessary to completely abolish the old-age pension (except in cases of disability, person's merits to the country).

From childhood, from school, a person needs to be taught that his main support is not the state, but the family, that children are obliged to support and feed their older relatives, as they took care of them in childhood. Everyone should see children as their direct investment in the future and their own well-being.

The thinking of hedonism and extreme individualism, which is now being imposed also at the level of propaganda, should be eliminated in favor of some form of corporatism, the center of which should be the family, which will realize itself as a self-sufficient unit, on all members of which its well-being depends.

It is also necessary to destroy the dreamy thinking about life in the masses, which is also promoted through the media and culture. Many people now feel undervalued and their illusory ambitions unfulfilled, which society has imposed on them. There must be rich, middle-class, and poor people, there must be people who will be ready to do the simplest and dirtiest work without grumbling about life and without the need to import immigrants, because there are only "academics who should not dirty their hands." Only culturally/religiously close people should be accepted as immigrants, exceptions are only for outstanding specialists.

Money rewards for having children are a bit overrated and create social parasites. The only one I like is Russian "maternity capital", a sum of money given to mothers they can use to buy/build a house. interest-free loans are also good. Plus those outstanding mothers who give birth to some five children should feel some kind of privilege in society.