Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: The Lies End Now, White Caucasoid Men Dominated Brown Caucasoid Men, Genetics Proves It

  1. #1
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2022
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 02:53 PM
    Ethnicity
    Central Italian/English
    Country
    United States
    Y-DNA
    J2a1-Z435
    Gender
    Posts
    23
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 5
    Given: 0

    1 Not allowed!

    Thumbs up The Lies End Now, White Caucasoid Men Dominated Brown Caucasoid Men, Genetics Proves It

    Many Middle Eastern/North Africans are insecure about the origins of Haplogroup J. For many years the lie has been spread that it comes from the middle east but the reality is they were fair skinned Caucasoid men from the Caucuses who largely over ran the middle east and bred millions of Brown Caucasoid woman while many Haplogroup E Caucasoid men fled into North Africa.

    Haplogroup J started appearing in the Middle East around 5700 BC.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satsurblia_Cave#Genetics

    The oldest J1 man from the Caucuses, confirmed for fair skin, brown hair, brown eyes and carrier of genes for blue eyes.


    From 20,000BC-5700BC (possibly even earlier) and onwards the middle east and North Africa was largely populated by men who's Y-DNA lineages were E, T, H and CT. (Their women to but I am not going into details for MTDNA) . There men are the originators of the Semitic and AfroAsiatic languages, not J men.


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Po...hic_B#Genetics

    As you can see, Haplogroup J men are non existent.

    Now it wasn't a case of total war when the J men migrated into the middle east but there is no doubt that there would have been significant amounts of conflict depending on the region. I think most of the conflict would have happened around Northern Arabia, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon and Israel while J men who went to other regions engaged in more peaceful/trading relations and brought many of their women. The J men who went to the areas I mentioned likely migrated with little to none of their women.

    The J men speaking language isolates over ran regions, took brown Caucasoid women by the millions.


    https://hamiticunion.proboards.com/t...gin-haplogroup

    This can be assumed due to the proof on this site, the majority of the Black race descends from Brown Caucasoid men who were fleeing the middle east from Haplogroup J men, they had none of their women with them. They eventually found the black pygmies, bred their women and the mixed descendants bred with other Pygmies spreading the biological genes for size and creating the modern Black race.

    So it is obvious that a massive group of Haplogroup E men went deep into the interior of Africa in search of women, they would have already had kin inhabiting North Africa during this time but I think this happened several times in many waves as more waves of Haplogroup J men came displacing communities.


    The ravaging fair skinned Caucasoid men simply took all their women , they were generally taller, stronger and much more appealing to the women due to their fair skin and strong physique.






    It is also a similar situation in South Asia only it happened much later in South Asia than it did in the middle east.

    1. Dravidian Caucasoids (Neolithic Iranians) enter India and create the Indus Valley Civilization, Brown Caucasoids.

    2. Their civilization declines , Rama Empire and much of it is exterminated by the Atlanteans who genocided many of them , with most of their women dead the Brown Caucasoid men had to mix with the Non-Caucasoid primitive indigenous people of India who were by this time largely a mix of East Asians, Australoids and Onge tribals like many of them are today. This caused large groups of more pure East Asian tribals to flee into North East India.

    3. Final wave of the most dominant Aryan Culture the Vedic Tribes, 1500 BC Fair skinned Caucasoids migrate into India waging war among each other, eventually become culturally dominant and go on a 1000 year streak of fair skinned Caucasoid men breeding moderately mixed brown Caucasoid women and heavily mixed Caucasoid women , since they were outnumbered by the Brown Caucasoids and the indigenous inhabitants combined plus their women making a much smaller genetic contribution meant they would be genetically absorbed to the point where the vast majority of the population does not resemble them.

    4. Similar situation is repeated later in Indian history, IndoGreek invaders, millions of Indian women across India suck big tan meaty Greek invader cocks, the Greeks having White Supremacist attitudes did not leave a big genetic mark but later invaders like the Scythians left a big genetic mark breeding millions of moderately mixed Brown Caucasoid Punjabi Indian/Other Indian women bred by fair skinned European looking Scythian men.

    Last edited by PrimarisOrion; 12-27-2023 at 10:38 AM.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2023
    Last Online
    01-05-2024 @ 05:50 AM
    Ethnicity
    ????
    Country
    Abkhazia
    Gender
    Posts
    935
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 453
    Given: 559

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    I agree. A lot, actually.

  3. #3
    Carlson's Raider HectorOfTroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Last Online
    04-24-2024 @ 08:01 PM
    Location
    Eridanus II
    Meta-Ethnicity
    SPARTAN II & SPARTAN III
    Ethnicity
    bro
    Ancestry
    iberian + amerindian with minor iranic and east euro admix
    Country
    Antarctica
    Y-DNA
    R1b
    mtDNA
    R0
    Taxonomy
    Rather tall, meso-brachyskelic, ecto-meso
    Politics
    Guns
    Religion
    Christian
    Gender
    Posts
    1,392
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 923
    Given: 1,156

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PrimarisOrion View Post
    The ravaging fair skinned Caucasoid men simply took all their women , they were generally taller, stronger and much more appealing to the women due to their fair skin and strong physique.
    This one you're just flattering yourself. Only Nordids, UPs, and Balkanites are considered "tall". Indian Hunter Gatherers were tall, said to be 5'11 or 6ft average, of course this is assuming mesoskelic proportions, height estimation from remains are based off of leg bones, Indians are generally lanky so they might've been shorter. But still, even Coon/the old timer anthropologists describe the Anglo race as only "rather tall" while North Indians and Iranids are described as "Tall". I'm 180 (181 out of bed) and walking around the grocery store or mall in North America I'm taller than 60% of your kind. You guys are not "tall" on average, only tall-ish, and probably shorter than those brown Iranoid caucasoids. The white North American male is 178-179 on avg, upper class British in 20th century were said to be 178cm (They would've been Anglo Saxon mostly, well fed, and genetically interchangeable with an anglo north american almost).

    You guys have good muscle building genetics though, I guess.

    The fair skin thing on men is probably bunk, why would it matter on a guy to a woman who is not fair herself? Fair skin gives the impression of softness (soft colors, darks give harsher impressions), aka femininity, not exactly a sought after impression on a man. That's why the tall dark and handsome saying exists. Men are typically darker than women too if you look at male - female facial averages by country or ethnicity. So yeah, the last one is probably total bullcrap.

  4. #4
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2022
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 02:53 PM
    Ethnicity
    Central Italian/English
    Country
    United States
    Y-DNA
    J2a1-Z435
    Gender
    Posts
    23
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 5
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HectorOfTroy View Post
    This one you're just flattering yourself. Only Nordids, UPs, and Balkanites are considered "tall". Indian Hunter Gatherers were tall, said to be 5'11 or 6ft average, of course this is assuming mesoskelic proportions, height estimation from remains are based off of leg bones, Indians are generally lanky so they might've been shorter. But still, even Coon/the old timer anthropologists describe the Anglo race as only "rather tall" while North Indians and Iranids are described as "Tall". I'm 180 (181 out of bed) and walking around the grocery store or mall in North America I'm taller than 60% of your kind. You guys are not "tall" on average, only tall-ish, and probably shorter than those brown Iranoid caucasoids. The white North American male is 178-179 on avg, upper class British in 20th century were said to be 178cm (They would've been Anglo Saxon mostly, well fed, and genetically interchangeable with an anglo north american almost).

    You guys have good muscle building genetics though, I guess.

    The fair skin thing on men is probably bunk, why would it matter on a guy to a woman who is not fair herself? Fair skin gives the impression of softness (soft colors, darks give harsher impressions), aka femininity, not exactly a sought after impression on a man. That's why the tall dark and handsome saying exists. Men are typically darker than women too if you look at male - female facial averages by country or ethnicity. So yeah, the last one is probably total bullcrap.


    You are a insecure guy with tan skin. Some Ancient Roman art depicted darker men with women because during that time it was considered masculine for men to be dark which meant they were outside in the sun all day working while the woman was a house wife who was indoors most of the time.





    It is true, the men who brought more genes for fair skin, light eyes and light hair to the middle east were the J1 men (and the isolated blonde/blue eyed hunter gatherer tribes before them but they left little to no genetic impact).



    I am 6'2 and my friend who is J-L829/PF4872 is 6'1. It isn't wrong, the J horde of men were significantly lighter than the Indigenous Caucasoid men of the middle east who were all medium tone brown to dark brown skinned, all the J men were Fair skinned to light intermediate, some were likely pale skinned to.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-24-2023, 10:26 PM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-14-2021, 08:29 PM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-02-2019, 01:58 PM
  4. Turkmen from ancient Caucasoid to Mongoloid-Caucasoid DNA
    By ButlerKing in forum Anthropology
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-24-2013, 10:48 AM
  5. Are Brown eyes an original Caucasoid trait?
    By John in Denver in forum Off-topic
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-16-2010, 06:30 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •