0
Well, it's not untrue. the set 'blue eyed humans' does do better academically than the set 'brown eyed humans'. I don't see why we should dismiss it as 'wank' or 'nordicist crap', that some 'populist' pop-science got some mainstream press (this article being quite old already). People are smart enough to decypher blue eyes=european and intepret it correctly. So it's good when these stories come through to the press, compared to what normally comes through.
I don't imagine u ppl would have acted hostile/butthurt as the pic above says (well, except one of you ) if they had done 'white skin leads to more academic success'. That would be pretty hilarious if it happened - the shitstorm !
but because it's 'blue eyes' we feel a bit of need for 'smart racialist anti-nordicism' I guess
Bookmarks