The Axis of freedom,How Russia is destroying American liberal order in the mud of Ukrainian plains!

[Victor]

There you are right, you really don't count anymore, you are debtors to China right now.

Our external debt is insignificant for the state like Russia, if you point out China, it's some 125 bln of $, which is nothing. While China literally owns some states through real debts. Do you have to add something?

[Victor]

I don't want to embarrass you by comparing the proportion, proximity and quality of the services in your city with those of my town of a thousand inhabitants, Victor.

After all, you are in an area close to war.

But hey! You will surely pay less for gas and gasoline. At least I hope so.

Victor, this is not you against me.

List me the examples of services to compare with, some five of them, not more.

[gixajo]

Nah, we just get into your pathetic moralistic games and it looks like we want to sell you something just as you say. It would be sooner China who will buy your ass, not Russia, anyway.

I don't know where exactly you see a moral judgment in my evaluations. I have said many times that this is not "good versus evil" that tends to be more of a typical approach for all of you.

In an improvised speech I can fall into a pseudo-moral judgment because no one can act with coordinates that are unrelated to a certain morality, but I usually avoid it.

I don't think you or Kirill are evil.

But it does give me the impression that you rejoice at the thought of seeing the West "defeated",even if you didn't improve at all, in the same sense that there are people who rejoice at seeing a football rival lose even when it is not their team that defeats them.

Yes, I often perceive in you a vindictive, a revanchist attitude, a certain attitude of, "as I am screwed , I want to see everybody else get screwed" and even more so when apparently they have gotten it deep inside your heads that your regrets are our fault.

[gixajo]

List me the examples of services to compare with, some five of them, not more.

I already told you that I'm not going to do it.

[Victor]

I don't know where exactly you see a moral judgment in my evaluations. I have said many times that this is not "good versus evil" that tends to be more of a typical approach for all of you.

In an improvised speech I can fall into a pseudo-moral judgment because no one can act with coordinates that are unrelated to a certain morality, but I usually avoid it.

I don't think you or Kirill are evil.

But it does give me the impression that you rejoice at the thought of seeing the West "defeated",even if you didn't improve at all, in the same sense that there are people who rejoice at seeing a football rival lose even when it is not their team that defeats them.

Yes, I often perceive in you a vindictive, a revanchist attitude, a certain attitude of, "as I am screwed , I want to see everybody else get screwed" and even more so when apparently they have gotten it deep inside your heads that your regrets are our fault.

I don't give a damn about West in this way, just the only needed to get out of our lawn. You may do anything you want on your lawn. Kirill indeed acts more morale than I do, for me everything is way more simple. After the war I will come to Spain (or not) without any feelings (bad or good) towards Spaniards. And you writing about me being evil or not is some lunacy for me, why you even care about it?

You see, I don't start threads like this and I don't talk about any pathetic "Axis of freedom/evil" for me morale part of this story barely matters. The best will be if Western (first of all USA, because Europeans except for UK are little babies) attempts will disperse into some other wars and Ukraine will be semi-abandoned, I don't want this war to last, everything out of our lawn is already not our problem.

[gixajo]

Our external debt is insignificant for the state like Russia, if you point out China, it's some 125 bln of $, which is nothing. While China literally owns some states through real debts. Do you have to add something?

Tell me who's in charge here.

[gixajo]

For a change tomorrow I have a morning schedule (and the day after afternoon), so if you don't mind I'm going to sleep.

I haven't worked in the morning for months, I hope I remember everything.

[Victor]

For a change tomorrow I have a morning schedule (and the day after afternoon), so if you don't mind I'm going to sleep.

I haven't worked in the morning for months, I hope I remember everything.

Do you expect a goodnight kiss on the bald spot?

[KirillMazur]

You are no light that illuminates any path, even less than what the West can represent, rather you cover and hide the light, it bothers you.

Strong text. It was as if a woman was writing.
A normal, peaceful life. A man and a woman, mom and dad. Prohibition of pedophilia and pornography in children's institutions.

Russia has always had an ideology: friendship and mutually beneficial and equal cooperation. The trouble is that small nations do not need friendship. They need an owner. They submit to those who beat and humiliate them. A striking example is Japan, on which the United States dropped two atomic bombs. The Slavic brothers have the same lackey psychology (except maybe Serbs).

And large countries don’t need friendship either. They need slaves. And ways to better rob their partner.

So no one needs our ideology in the world. And ideology at all. Ideology is for the (shrinking) middle class.
Below comes religion.
Above is cosmopolitanism.
So resources and food are above all in the future.

[Oghuz]

The way these three are making strategic moves now inter-operatively has never been practiced before like attacking petro $, blocking the Persian Gulf and Red Sea, Black sea, Pacific engagement etc, it seems like the Sino-Irano-Russo alliance has learned its lesson of opening battle domains that are more strategic than just mere military exchanges. Something USSR never learnt during its existence.