yet another POLITICAL TEST

[Comealongwithme]

[frankhammer]

I don't have a problem with it as long as indeed they are as competent. I actually know female "mechanics", they do light stuff but no problem with that. Women typically have some qualities that can be useful even in that environement.

Logically i would then draw the line at equal opportunity but not equal outcome policies (this is where we at right now)

While I agree, workshops, building sites and so forth require people who are utterly reliable. In the modern era of maternity leave that can stretch out to 12 months, where the employer must keep the position open, this can be a real problem. IMO, in those career choices, women aren't suitable. Personally, as a person whose business is trade related, I quietly defy the law and only hire men. (I also tend to hire within my ethnicity too. Indians and Chinese are untrustworthy, imo)

[Scarface F]

[Victor]

[CosmoLady]

Just putting mine again for you.

High fairness, low liberty scores must be the product of homogenous, egalitarian, socialist/communist societies.

The care score seems to be an indicator of male or female sex. (Males tend to be less caring, not always)

The purity score seems to be an indictor of healthful behaviour.

I'm surprised that I had a high authority score, I don't feel very authoritarian.

[Teutone]

I think being in favor of a hierarchical order/society is the biggest indicator of being right wing.

Egalitarianism is a core liberal principle.

There were hierarchical societies just like the Prussian Empire that had a pathway to a higher status for lower classes but that was through a hierarchical structure like the military, I am not sure if that would account for a egalitarian pathway.

Calling yourself a fascist 2024 openly, would completely throw you out of any public discourse, but the more I read about fascism the more I think very highly of it.

Class collaboration is one of the main pillars of social architecture in fascism. In the words of Benito Mussolini, fascism "affirms the irremediable, fruitful, and beneficent inequality of men".[1] Given this premise, fascists conclude that the preservation of social hierarchy is in all of the classes' interests and therefore all classes should collaborate in its defense: the lower and the higher classes should accept their roles and perform their respective duties.

In fascist thought, the principle of class collaboration is combined with ultranationalism. The stability and the prosperity of the nation was seen as the ultimate purpose of collaboration between classes.

Class collaboration implies National Syndicalism as the preferred model for the economy. The state, having a non-class character, would mediate between employers and employees. Among other things, such mediation would entail disallowing strikes by employees and lockouts by employers; setting up state-run corporations/syndicates as the sole representatives of given industries; and allowing only state-run labor unions to represent employee interests.

[Sylvanas]

Well....

[Jingle Bell]

Care: 69
Fairness: 60
Liberty: 56
In-Group: 83
Purity: 71
Authority: 75

[tropicalslavic]

[Tooting Carmen]

I think being in favor of a hierarchical order/society is the biggest indicator of being right wing.

Egalitarianism is a core liberal principle.

There were hierarchical societies just like the Prussian Empire that had a pathway to a higher status for lower classes but that was through a hierarchical structure like the military, I am not sure if that would account for a egalitarian pathway.

Calling yourself a fascist 2024 openly, would completely throw you out of any public discourse, but the more I read about fascism the more I think very highly of it.

Class collaboration is one of the main pillars of social architecture in fascism. In the words of Benito Mussolini, fascism "affirms the irremediable, fruitful, and beneficent inequality of men".[1] Given this premise, fascists conclude that the preservation of social hierarchy is in all of the classes' interests and therefore all classes should collaborate in its defense: the lower and the higher classes should accept their roles and perform their respective duties.

In fascist thought, the principle of class collaboration is combined with ultranationalism. The stability and the prosperity of the nation was seen as the ultimate purpose of collaboration between classes.

Class collaboration implies National Syndicalism as the preferred model for the economy. The state, having a non-class character, would mediate between employers and employees. Among other things, such mediation would entail disallowing strikes by employees and lockouts by employers; setting up state-run corporations/syndicates as the sole representatives of given industries; and allowing only state-run labor unions to represent employee interests.

Indeed, Fascism need not mean anything like the cruelties and atrocities of the Nazis. In fact, if you look at Salazar and Peron in particular, they could be described as 'benevolent fascists': although autocratic, human rights abuses were relatively small beer, and the country was run on a kind of corporatist model which combined both socialism and capitalism.