Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Are Arabs The Humans With Less Archaic Admix?

  1. #1
    Junior Member Gohenk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2024
    Last Online
    04-22-2024 @ 11:09 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Earthling+Sayan
    Ethnicity
    Earthling
    Country
    Australia
    Gender
    Posts
    43
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8
    Given: 28

    0 Not allowed!

    Default Are Arabs The Humans With Less Archaic Admix?

    Member Oliver already made a similar thread but, apparently, he couldn't explain very well
    So, Africans have less neanderthal but more admix from an unknown African Archaic hominim.
    Arabs have probably nearly no admix from that African hominim.
    Arabs also have less neanderthal than Europeans, Levantines and Asians.
    In terms of phenotype, Arabs Also have a quite progressive look and only differ from gracile-mediterraneans mainly in soft tissues.

  2. #2
    Junior Member Gohenk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2024
    Last Online
    04-22-2024 @ 11:09 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Earthling+Sayan
    Ethnicity
    Earthling
    Country
    Australia
    Gender
    Posts
    43
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8
    Given: 28

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Anyone?

  3. #3
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    tipirneni's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Last Online
    04-23-2024 @ 03:20 PM
    Location
    Texas
    Meta-Ethnicity
    South Asian
    Ethnicity
    Indian
    Ancestry
    Salkhit 625SNP, Otzi 803SNP, Mik15 798SNP, RISE493 1335SNP, I11456 1024SNP, I7718 980SNP, I9041 512S
    Country
    United States
    Region
    Texas
    Y-DNA
    H-M82 Z5890+Z34522+
    mtDNA
    U2a1a3*
    Taxonomy
    sub-brachycephalic+Atlanto-Mediterranean+Caucasus-Alpine
    Hero
    James Bond
    Religion
    Hindu
    Gender
    Posts
    2,669
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,458
    Given: 1,641

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    You are thinking all Arabs are Basal and probably extrapolating to Jews etc.. which might not be true



    The earliest sample from Georgia, An Upper Paleolithic specimen from Kotias Klde cave in the Caucasus (Caucasus_25,000BP) had around 24% Basal Eurasian and 76% Upper Paleolithic European ancestry and that ancestry was the main y-dna that replaced those DE branches in Arabia and Levant. many Arabs have higher caucasian input and also very recent high caucasian admix. Some of the Levant have highest localised Neanderthal input due to caves there.

  4. #4
    Veteran Member Kess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Last Online
    Today @ 01:44 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Turkic
    Ethnicity
    Turkish-Karachay
    Country
    Antarctica
    Y-DNA
    R1b
    Politics
    Close to Center
    Religion
    Agnosticism
    Gender
    Posts
    5,567
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,329
    Given: 3,036

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gohenk View Post
    Member Oliver already made a similar thread but
    Lool

    I just came here to say a Loliver thread and I’m still not quite wrong.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-23-2020, 10:12 PM
  2. West Africans may have nearly 20% archaic admix !
    By Mopi Licinius Crassus in forum Anthropology
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-12-2020, 10:41 PM
  3. Which archaic human would you admix with?
    By Peterski in forum Sexuality
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 12-19-2017, 06:49 PM
  4. Which archaic human would you admix with?
    By Peterski in forum Rate Attractiveness
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 08-26-2017, 06:11 PM
  5. Are Australoids living Archaic Humans?
    By Dominicanese in forum Anthropology
    Replies: 91
    Last Post: 12-13-2016, 10:42 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •