Croatian or Italian Culture: Which has contributed more to European cultural?

[Voskos]

It's relatively stupid comparison because Croatia was an independent medieval kingdom while Italy was created in 19. century (as well as Greece) for the first time.

Lol, even when you try to defend a croat , they show their low level, lower than the floor, and attack you instead of thanking you. your ''medieval history'' is somehow comparable to Rome?

who mentioned Greece (I agree with you that we're a new country)? You're a typical case of ad hominem narcissist with low compreshension skills, low inhibition, no morals. It's a consequence of not having any history further than the middle ages.

[Dušan]

Lol, even when you try to defend a croat , they show their low level, lower than the floor, and attack you instead of thanking you. your ''medieval history'' is somehow comparable to Rome?

who mentioned Greece (I agree with you that we're a new country)? You're a typical case of ad hominem narcissist with low compreshension skills, low inhibition, no morals. It's a consequence of not having any history further than the middle ages.

They didnt have independent medieval kingdom.
What is now northern part of Croatia, it was integral part of medieval Hungary.
Southern part was autonomous province of medieval Hungary since 1102.

[Scarface F]

[Dušan]

[Scarface F]

They didnt have independent medieval kingdom.
What is now northern part of Croatia, it was integral part of medieval Hungary.
Southern part was autonomous province of medieval Hungary since 1102.

ofcourse we did, Serv.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_Croatia

Historical era Middle Ages

• Elevation to kingdom
c. 925
• Succession crisis and coronation of King Coloman of Hungary
1102

Meanwhile Serbs were naked people in central Balkans that got their name as slaves to the Byzantines if we are to believe DAI

[Scarface F]

[Scarface F]

I was just banned from askBalkan sub reddit becuase of attacks on Croatians.

[Voskos]

They didnt have independent medieval kingdom.
What is now northern part of Croatia, it was integral part of medieval Hungary.
Southern part was autonomous province of medieval Hungary since 1102.

don't reply to the witch, and angry Jankec. waste of your time.

[Dušan]

ofcourse we did, Serv.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_Croatia

Historical era Middle Ages

• Elevation to kingdom
c. 925
• Succession crisis and coronation of King Coloman of Hungary
11

Meanwhile Serbs were naked people in central Balkans that got their name as slaves to the Byzantines if we are to believe DAI

Let we see to what Croatian kings main Zagreb cathedral was dedicated:

"It is dedicated to the Assumption of Mary and to kings Saint Stephen and Saint Ladislaus."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zagreb...nt%20Ladislaus.


Stephen I, also known as King Saint Stephen (Hungarian: Szent István király), was the last Grand Prince of the Hungarians between 997 and 1000 or 1001, and the first King of Hungary from 1000 or 1001, until his death in 1038.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_I_of_Hungary



Ladislaus I (Hungarian: I. László), also known as Saint Ladislas, was King of Hungary from 1077 and King of Croatia from 1091.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ladislaus_I_of_Hungary

[Scarface F]

^^^^but Zagreb cathedral was after personal Union. Croatia is older than Hungary (founded year 1000)

anyway, I prefer you Serbs to Italians