Do Scandinavians originate from an ancient mixing with Mongoloids?

[cass]

The ancestors of northern Europeans had a weak Siberian element immanent in them. Even if someone had doubts about the G25's results, it is clearly visible, for example, on the dodecad k12b. Much of this element has been diluted in modern northern populations. Below, ancient and modern populations ranked from most northern.

[Abaddon]

The ancestors of northern Europeans had a weak Siberian element immanent in them. Even if someone had doubts about the G25's results, it is clearly visible, for example, on the dodecad k12b. Much of this element has been diluted in modern northern populations. Below, ancient and modern populations ranked from most northern.

As expected, almost none of them runs East Asian admixture but their Siberian component is present.

Does this Siberian sample means Nganasan or something?

[cass]

As expected, almost none of them runs East Asian admixture but their Siberian component is present.

Does this Siberian sample means Nganasan or something?

Indeed.

Distance to: Nganassan
0.00000000 Siberian
141.42135624 Gedrosia
141.42135624 Northwest_African
141.42135624 Southeast_Asian
141.42135624 Atlantic_Med
141.42135624 North_European
141.42135624 South_Asian
141.42135624 East_African
141.42135624 Southwest_Asian
141.42135624 East_Asian
141.42135624 Caucasus
141.42135624 Sub_Saharan

[ecptr]

He is Indian I think (former user Borealis)

Slow clap...I mean bobs and vagene

[Creaticia]

What are the coordinates of the source?

[Septentrion]

I notice that many Scandinavians (Swedes, Norwegians, etc.) have Asian traits (1 to 2% at most). How can this be explained genetically and historically?

Obviously not! Scandinavians are well amongst the “purest” Europids in Northern Europe. Yes, they are “up there” with the British Islanders, Dutch, etc... This is why they look the way they do (Nordid!!). You know very blond-pigmented, fine-featured and so on (stereotypically). The so-called “Asian traits” are not Asian. It could be due to relatively recent interbreeding with the Arctic European populations (the Saamis!).

[DraviXi99]

Obviously not! Scandinavians are well amongst the “purest” Europids in Northern Europe. Yes, they are “up there” with the British Islanders, Dutch, etc... This is why they look the way they do (Nordid!!). You know very blond-pigmented, fine-featured and so on (stereotypically). The so-called “Asian traits” are not Asian. It could be due to relatively recent interbreeding with the Arctic European populations (the Saamis!).

Nerd

[fromjutt]

the founders of the society for nordish physical anthropology
chose to publish only the second volume
of kristian schreiner's two volume set:

Crania Norvegica II

what is in the first volume
that might be relevant to this topic

the second volume is only partially available online, i have the two set full volume books, the first volume describes and measures skulls from medieval era from trondhiem and oslo, it covers around a massive 2000 skulls from medieval norway, second volume covers variying eras but the most extensive is from iron age norway (before viking age) 80 percent of the skulls among iron age norwegians

[fromjutt]

The ancestors of northern Europeans had a weak Siberian element immanent in them. Even if someone had doubts about the G25's results, it is clearly visible, for example, on the dodecad k12b. Much of this element has been diluted in modern northern populations. Below, ancient and modern populations ranked from most northern.

absolutely not, majority of your fits are terrible??? what is this even portraying LMAO, also dont fret. ive checked nordic bronze age, battle axe and iron age Scandinavian samples and majority of them have zero siberian or asian, actually, asian or saami admixture as increased recently due to viking age slavery, proven by academics