15.000 english soldiers enough to conquer India.

[renaissance12]

I'm tired of idiots.

Long story short:

The British used Indians to conquer Indians. They wouldn't have been able to do it on their own. It's the same situation with the French in Algeria and the Spanish in Latin America.

Why do people make these threads? The answer is within your own reach (pick up a book).

So what do you propose for your tiredness? Your internet suicide or your return to american primary schools where they teach stupid things to stupid children like you?

[Colonel Frank Grimes]

So what do you propose for your tiredness? Your internet suicide or your return to american primary schools where they teach stupid things to stupid children like you?

If I'm stupid, then what are you? I educated you on something that as you can see from how people responded in this thread is common knowledge.

[renaissance12]

If I'm stupid, then what are you? I educated you on something that as you can see from how people responded in this thread is common knowledge.

No.. it is not "if I' m stupid" .. it is a fact that you are stupid..

[Colonel Frank Grimes]

No.. it is not "if I' m stupid" .. it is a fact that you are stupid..

Yes, the guy who educated you in this thread on how the British conquered India is the stupid one, and not the guy who asked a stupid question because his depth of historical knowledge is shallow.

Okay.

[renaissance12]

India was not divided in small areas....

English soldiers faced Mughal Empiree and Maratha empire that were still huge with 5 times the people of all England..



For almost the entirety of the early modern period (from the 16th to 18th century, roughly), Indian armies were in the most part not poorly armed or inferior in terms of technology when compared to the Europeans.

What separated the Enghish soldiers from Indian ones is almost exclusively discipline..

[Colonel Frank Grimes]

India was not divided in small areas....

English soldiers faced Mughal Empiree and Maratha empire that were still huge with 5 times the people of all England..



For almost the entirety of the early modern period (from the 16th to 18th century, roughly), Indian armies were in the most part not poorly armed or inferior in terms of technology when compared to the Europeans.

What separated the Enghish soldiers from Indian ones is almost exclusively discipline..

I'm glad you tried to learn the subject in the last twenty or so minutes but - and this is because you are stupid - you ignore the English used mostly Indian troops in their conflicts.

Take another twenty minutes learning about the subject and then get back to us.

[~Elizabeth~]

I don't know anything about this subject but I want to say it's not nice to call people stupid. It's hurtful.

I'm new to this subject. Never thought about it before. Why did some Indians fight for the British against their own people?

I'll leave this thread and look at the rest of the forum. I don't want to argue with anyone.

[Colonel Frank Grimes]

I don't know anything about this subject but I want to say it's not nice to call people stupid. It's hurtful.

I'm new to this subject. Never thought about it before. Why did some Indians fight for the British against their own people?

I'll leave this thread and look at the rest of the forum. I don't want to argue with anyone.

Indians didn't have a national consciousness. It would be like a Greek looking at a German and saying, "Oh, we are fellow Europeans. I don't want to fight my fellow Europeans." They fought for the British because the British paid them well enough.

The only reason India exists today as a country is because English is the Lengua Franca. Otherwise, it would have split up into different countries. India is made up of many ethnic groups.

[renaissance12]

I'm glad you tried to learn the subject in the last twenty or so minutes but - and this is because you are stupid - you ignore the English used mostly Indian troops in their conflicts.

Take another twenty minutes learning about the subject and then get back to us.

You are always wrong American donkey (without offending the donkeys who have no fault) .

I discussed on the HISTORYFORUM some years ago how the British took over India militarily in 18-19th centuries..

Donkey.. Settle for MARVEL comics as a source for your limited cognitive abilities..

[~Elizabeth~]

Indians didn't have a national consciousness. It would be like a Greek looking at a German and saying, "Oh, we are fellow Europeans. I don't want to fight my fellow Europeans." They fought for the British because the British paid them well enough.

The only reason India exists today as a country is because English is the Lengua Franca. Otherwise, it would have split up into different countries. India is made up of many ethnic groups.

On the other forum I'm on, Stormfront, Greeks and Germans don't fight each other because they are fellow Europeans first.

That the British paid some Indians to fight other Indians somewhat explains it to me. Thank you CFG.