1
They are seen at the beginning between 1:30-2:18. A good snapshot of the political issues at the time.
These men are from Angus in eastern Scotland. The genome of the area's inhabiting population is overwhelmingly PICTISH. However, there was some English migration to this area (the east coast; stretching from Fife up to Aberdeenshire) in the 11th-14th Centuries as a result of the development of the proto-urban Royal Burghs. These migrations were pivotal in the retreat of Gaelic from the area. Yes, the modern inhabitants of eastern Scotland are two languages removed from their original native tongue. The only areas where the Gaelic tribes made their genetic presence felt was along the western coast (be it in the Highlands or the SW). The Picts, previously the sole inhabitants of the northern section of Scotland (above the Antonine Wall), were now confined, as an unadmixed community, to the eastern area in question. Eventually, they were assimilated into the Gaelic culture, but there is no evidence that it was through population movements. Those who migrated across the Irish Sea in the 4th Century were unlikely to have been large in number and this is besides the fact that by many genetic studies, those in eastern Scotland actually cluster closer to the English than the Irish. Anyhow, Coon and co. spoke of the bizygomatic width of men in this area being 141 mm (the same as the Irish), but they seem broader-faced (than the Irish). The bizygomatic width here seems more along the lines of 145 mm. I will admit that a rather distinctive trait found in Scotland, concerning the very high and wide cheekbones, whereby the widest point of the face is literally just under the line of the eyes, seems exclusive to the eastern parts, as exemplified in this video. I don't see that amongst those in any other part of Scotland.
It's easy to think of pre-4th Century Scotland as being entirely 'Pictish' thanks to the symbolism perpetrated by Hadrian's Wall, but I must repeat, it was the Antonine Wall, situated between the firths of Clyde and Forth that was the final frontier of the Roman Empire, before what they saw as the lands of the unruly Picts. Southern Scotland was not Pictish at all, rather it was inhabited by Britons. The Britons and Picts probably bore a negligible genetic difference between one another, but it's not surprising that Scotland's geography ensured that there would be some kind of genetic/cultural/linguistic drift between the two groups, to an extent that they couldn't be considered the same populace.
Bookmarks