Churches for different races vs. One Church for everyone

[Mortimer]

A Catholic writes:


The thing is, Protestants have different churches for white people, black people, Korean people, Chinese people, Mexican people, but in the Catholic Church there is one Mass for all races, and we sit together in the pews like we're all brothers and sisters in Christ, because we are.


Mortis opinion:

its not neccessary a bad thing, that they have different churches for different races, because then different races have more self-determination and autonomy. Likely the pastor will be one of them, the service will be more adjusted to their own culture.

There is a Church for Gypsies, Pentecoastal or Evangelical movement. I dont think its a bad idea really. In the Catholic Church I never saw one Gypsy as Priest, nor ever a Gypsy Saint. I do like the universal aspect of the Catholic Church though, Catholic means "for all" or "universal" but i think they did a bad job, giving representation to any Gypsy.

[Mortimer]

I took this debate as opportunity to highlight this topic on Youtube in one of my videos

[HectorOfTroy]

Guy on right looks like a member on here I forgot his name. Balkan guy who lives in Sweden.

[HectorOfTroy]

Humans are really not that genetically diverse across races. Most of the difference really is just color and hair texture, even the facial traits are not that concrete since some fully or almost fully white people can look psuedo SSA or psuedo mongoloid in terms of metrics.