Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Genes 'have key role in autism'

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Meta-Ethnicity
    .
    Ethnicity
    .
    Taxonomy
    .
    Gender
    Posts
    9,771
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 85
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default Genes 'have key role in autism'

    Genes 'have key role in autism'

    Scientists have produced the most compelling evidence to date that genetics play a key role in autism.
    They highlighted tiny genetic changes that appear to have a strong impact on the likelihood of developing autism and related conditions.
    The changes influence genes which help form and maintain connections between brain cells.
    The Nature study highlighted one common genetic variant which, if corrected would cut cases of autism by 15%.
    <!-- E SF -->Previously, other genetic variants have been linked to autism, but they are all relatively rare.
    Dr Raynard Kington, of the US National Institutes of Health, which funded the research, said: "These findings establish that genetic factors play a strong role in autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
    "Detailed analysis of the genes and how they affect brain development is likely to yield better strategies for diagnosing and treating children with autism."

    People with ASD, which include autism and Asperger's syndrome, have problems with social interaction, poor communication skills and tend to engage in repetitive behaviours.
    In the latest studies researchers scanned the human genome for small differences between people who have an ASD, and those who do not.
    The largest study, led by the University of Pennsylvania, focused on more than 10,000 people.

    Sticky cells

    It found several genetic variants commonly associated with ASD, all of them pointing two specific genes found on chromosome 5 which control production of proteins which help cells stick to each other, and make nervous connections.

    One variant, linked to a gene called CDH10, was so common - present in over 65% of cases of autism - that the researchers calculated that fixing it would cut the number of autism cases by 15%.
    They also linked ASD rather less strongly to a group of about 30 genes which produce proteins that play a key role in enabling brain cells to migrate to correct places, and to connect to neighbouring cells.

    Other genetic changes pinpointed by the Pennsylvania team occurred in genes involved in a cellular waste system which probably ensures these "adhesion" proteins are kept in working order.
    Lead researcher Dr Hakon Hakonarson said the genetics of ASD was likely to be complex.
    He said: "Because other autism researchers have made intriguing suggestions that autism arises from abnormal connections among brain cells during early development, it is very compelling to find evidence that mutations in genes involved in brain interconnections increase a child's risk of autism."
    But he added: "There are going to be many genes involved in causing autism.
    "In most cases, it's likely that each gene contributes a small amount of risk, and interacts with other genes and environmental factors to trigger the onset."
    Similar findings were reported in separate studies published in Annals of Human Genetics and Molecular Psychiatry.

    Science 'accelerating'

    Professor Simon Baron-Cohen, an autism expert at the University of Cambridge, said 133 genes had now been linked to the condition, and much work was needed to piece together how they interacted with each other and the environment.

    He said: "The puzzle is slowly being pieced together, and the science of autism is accelerating in promising ways."
    The National Autistic Society said the exact causes of autism were unknown.
    In a statement, the society said: "There is evidence to suggest that genetic factors are responsible for some forms of autism.
    "However, the difficulty of establishing gene involvement is compounded by the interaction of genes and by their interaction with environmental factors.
    "Various studies over many years have sought to identify candidate genes but so far inconclusively."
    Source

  2. #2
    Banned Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Meta-Ethnicity
    European-style American
    Ethnicity
    California dreaming
    Gender
    Posts
    2,585
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 28
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Here's the thing. I've read some of Dr. Natasha Campbell-McBride. She states that the epidemic of autism that has exploded in the last 15-20 cannot be completely explained by genetics. She says that genetic disorders do not normally work that quickly, since autism was an incredibly rare diease 20 years ago. Why have we gone from it being diagnosed from 1 in 10,000 to about 1 in 150? In just about 20 years? Something's not right here.

    I think that Natasha is correct in that it is our diet, and our lack of nuturing our gut flora that has contributed to our autism epidemic. Natasha Campbell-McBride's own son was diagnosed with autism at the age of three, and she was able to cure him with diet. No processed foods, and cultured foods at every meal. Foods like kvass, kefir, sauerkraut, yogurt, traditionally prepared salamis, eggs, butter, and whole raw milk.

    http://GutAndPsychologySyndrome.com

    Also known as GAPS.

  3. #3
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Vargtand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Online
    02-21-2010 @ 01:21 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    100% swedish, 0% German, 0% Russian, 0% Turk, 0% Ape
    Ethnicity
    Göte
    Region
    Goetaland
    Gender
    Posts
    1,100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 14
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Could be toxins in the food as well that disrupt the brain development as, as far as I know autisms are born that way. Now toxins have been known to cause mutations and alterations to the development of cells.

    I'm not a doctor though.. but then again I think many people that would not be considered autisms 20 years ago just slightly weird I suppose... are considered autisms today. the term has been watered out I think, that could be the main reason... I don't know though.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •