0
Came across this while being bored on Yahoo.
he would have served a smaller sentence for assaulting a man than Aaron Billington will for damaging a car.It's no secret that our laws are centred on possessions more than people but these examples just highlight how wrong they can be. Why is the legal system still deeming crime against people a lower priority than crimes against material objects?
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/blog/editor...article/25504/
Should posessions be worth more than people in the eyes of the law? Or are people more valuable, one is an inanimate object, but the other heals.
Bookmarks