0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 279 Given: 9 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,337 Given: 685 |
I tend more to Darwin type from the list above.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,993 Given: 1,342 |
i would say am eather Lincoln or Voltaire
Thumbs Up |
Received: 279 Given: 9 |
both of you are freak, not even human.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 45 Given: 24 |
Is this serious? Anyway, what the hell, I'd have to say I'm the Darwin type.
Atlanto-Celt, Brigantes & Epidii Tribes, Ó Foghladha Sept, Clan Lamont
Thumbs Up |
Received: 257 Given: 0 |
This scheme and human type theory is retarded, and it is interesting that they are still going on such escapades. It all looks too ambigious and vague in a racial sense to be viable in the least sense. Those types might exist in abstract or in general, but if one fails to differentiate the other types in more specific detail then one will fail in developing a human type theory. This emphasis on specific detail should be twofold, and it should orient itself on a racial level and then a more specific anthropological framework.
The races tend to differ in an anthropological sense, and if certain types among other races appear to be similar does not necessitate a relation between certain types belonging to another race. The difference in a general type does not associate one race or another, but we must treat each race as a difference in itself.
The distinctions between other phenotypical varieties and appearances should have their foundations on a differentiation made at the racial level. The rest of the details and distinctions should be made within the race itself on a microevolutionary scale, but should realize the processes and evolutionary/environment pressures, which have caused a certain type to mutate.
This Human Type Theory is not only vague and ambigious in a racial sense, but in a specific and detailed framework as it pertains to anthropolgical and phenotypical variety as found within a specific racial or ethnic category. I also don't like to break phenotypical and anthropological variety up into ethnic categories, but rather into a group or regional ethnic category, which centers around specific areas of the world.
This is pure bullshit, and I think there is a racial agenda here. Its trying to invoke further race-mixing by showing that the anthropological and phenotypical expressions of a genotype are not that different. I think a new analysis needs to be made that differentiates itself in a true and authentic manner. That is it differentiates itself in accordance with the diversity found in nature, and primarily on the foundation of racial distinctions.
This does a poor job, and probably is nothing more than a left-wing attempt to obscure and cover over the racial differences between anthropological/phenotypical varieties. These are the same people who are suppressing and repressing the true and authentic forms of racial and phenotypical classification. They have not only negated the regional category of racial and phenotypical classification, but now are attempting to undermine the racial category as well.
I don't know about you all but I find this to be a dangerous juxtaposition, and I believe we ought to rise to the occassion and start a new system of racial classification. A new system of classification which accords itself with the spirit of objectivity, scientific method, and scientific instruments. Its our imperative duty to rescue the science of racial taxonomy from leftist gutter dwellers, who want to utilize the nature of phenotypes and racial anthropology in order to distort the distinction between the races.
These people should be thrown into jail as criminals and abusers of the most true and real forms of information and knowledge. They are basically in some obscure and abstract manner revising the true and real process of genetic flow through certain populations.
They are denying the reality of evolution, and they are twisting it on their head for their own purposes. We ought to realize they are doing this, and yet if you utilize racial classifications in the appropriate manner then you are being a racist.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks