Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: A brief course of IndoEuropean linguistic studies. For those who does not know.

  1. #1
    Infant Terrible DarkZarathustra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last Online
    04-10-2024 @ 03:04 PM
    Location
    From Unknown Galaxy
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Freier Geist & Guter Europäer
    Ancestry
    Frankreich & Skandinavien
    Country
    Germany
    Region
    Berlin
    Taxonomy
    Homo Europaus [dunkler Skando-Nordid]
    Politics
    Cultural Nietzscheanism
    Religion
    Die ewige Wiederkunft des Gleichen
    Relationship Status
    It's complicated
    Age
    42
    Gender
    Posts
    260
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8
    Given: 17

    0 Not allowed!

    Lightbulb A brief course of IndoEuropean linguistic studies. For those who does not know.

    A brief course of IndoEuropean linguistic studies. For those who does not know.

    By Latinist


    1. IndoEuropeans were born in Europe in the times of ice age. Statements that they were born in other parts of the world – were disproved else in the middle of 19 century. In that times it was a mistake but now – it can be only pure provocation came from the intelligent services ether Israel, or USA.

    2. IE were primordially nordid people. Statements about the opposite is provocation from the same sources.

    3. Early-IndoEuropeans language (EIE) consisted from 203 biconsonantal words. It is absolutely accurate figures. This were words, each of them contained in itself two consonant sounds and practically did not contained in itself any vowel sounds. So spoke forefathers of nordid people in the times when raged ice age. (180 thousand years in general). Statements that words of EARLY IndoEuropeans could contain in itself another number of consonants and whole series different vowel sounds – is pure provocation which was planned and was paid in the same instances.

    4. Nordid IE – the best part of humanity. All others – lower and worse. Statements about the opposite are not necessarily can be planned in the above intelligences, they can be and private opinion those who had not been lucky with their birth, for this hits very heavily at self-respect. In any case these statements are mistaken.A brief course of IndoEuropean linguistic studies. For those who does not know.

  2. #2
    Inactive Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last Online
    07-25-2011 @ 10:42 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Gone
    Ethnicity
    Gone
    Gender
    Posts
    5,345
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 94
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    I'd love to see these statements backed up with some sources since they run counter to the information about the Proto-Indo-Europeans that's in most of my history texts.

  3. #3
    Annoying member Lahtari's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last Online
    05-20-2012 @ 11:29 PM
    Location
    Nääsville
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Hillbilly
    Ethnicity
    Tavastian
    Country
    Finland
    Region
    Alabama
    Politics
    Alco-liberalism
    Religion
    Slam-ism
    Gender
    Posts
    633
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 9
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Talking

    As a non-IE, non-Nordid Mossad employee I definitely don't have any credibility to counter any of those most truthful claims, regardless of how valid my counter arguments would be. But behalf of my position I must make the ridiculous claim that this thread belongs in Off-topic or other lowbrow section instead of History & Ethnogenesis.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •