Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Danes and Denmark

  1. #1
    Genetically Engineered Ánleifr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Last Online
    01-12-2014 @ 10:30 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic & Celtic
    Ethnicity
    American
    Gender
    Posts
    751
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 23
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default Danes and Denmark

    When did the Danes inhabit Denmark, before or after the Angles, Jutes and Saxons?
    "A man must accept his fate or be destroyed by it." ~Spartacus

  2. #2
    Veteran Member The Lawspeaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Last Online
    11-05-2023 @ 04:45 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Dutch
    Ancestry
    Brabant, Holland, Guelders and some Hainaut.
    Country
    Netherlands
    Politics
    Norway Deal-NEXIT, Dutch Realm Atlanticist, Habsburg Legitimist
    Religion
    Sedevacantist
    Relationship Status
    Engaged
    Age
    36
    Gender
    Posts
    70,127
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 34,729
    Given: 61,129

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    How about: they are partially the same people ? They are their descendants and the descendants of the tribe of the Danes.



    Wake up and smell the coffee.


  3. #3
    Hormonal storm. Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    The Alchemist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Last Online
    03-29-2015 @ 08:12 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    .
    Ethnicity
    UFO
    Country
    Bhutan
    Region
    Brandenburg
    Taxonomy
    alpino atlantid
    Politics
    alle gegen alle
    Religion
    God is inside me
    Age
    11
    Gender
    Posts
    6,318
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 703
    Given: 539

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    I just think they're the most beautiful in the world ;D Sorry for not being helpful..
    I'm a peaceful warrior.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Last Online
    10-05-2014 @ 02:26 PM
    Ethnicity
    European
    Country
    European Union
    Gender
    Posts
    9,734
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,296
    Given: 3,160

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tuck View Post
    When did the Danes inhabit Denmark, before or after the Angles, Jutes and Saxons?
    Okay - long story short:

    The tribe called the Danes originally only inhabited the Danish Islands and Scania in Southern Sweden (Sweden nicked it). Danes were North Germanic speakers - Scandinavians.
    The Jutes inhabited Jutland but were weakened when many of their people went off to settle in England. Eventually the Danes extended their control to Jutland and created the Kingdom of Denmark. The Jutes were West Germanic and their language would have been similar to old English or old Frisian. Gradually they came to speak North Germanic and the North Germanic dialect of the Kingdom of Denmark developed into a language - Danish.

    Latter on the Vikings that invaded England from Denmark mainly came from Jutland. So the Jutes basically settled England twice really.


    Denmark was part of the area where the Germanic culture first formed. The Germanics developed from Indo-Europeans mixing with the native inhabitants of Northern Europe.

    As for Angles and Saxons - they don't come into it, they lived further south in today's Germany. The Angle homeland is very close to the Danish border but on the German side. It was depopulated and described as being devoid of people once the Angles left for England. It seems the whole tribe left which is unusual because usually some would stay behind.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Vasa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last Online
    11-24-2016 @ 09:40 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Nordic
    Ethnicity
    Swedish
    Country
    Sweden
    Region
    Stockholm
    Age
    22
    Gender
    Posts
    800
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,289
    Given: 201

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Albion View Post
    Okay - long story short:

    The tribe called the Danes originally only inhabited the Danish Islands and Scania in Southern Sweden (Sweden nicked it). Danes were North Germanic speakers - Scandinavians.
    The Jutes inhabited Jutland but were weakened when many of their people went off to settle in England. Eventually the Danes extended their control to Jutland and created the Kingdom of Denmark. The Jutes were West Germanic and their language would have been similar to old English or old Frisian. Gradually they came to speak North Germanic and the North Germanic dialect of the Kingdom of Denmark developed into a language - Danish.

    Latter on the Vikings that invaded England from Denmark mainly came from Jutland. So the Jutes basically settled England twice really.


    Denmark was part of the area where the Germanic culture first formed. The Germanics developed from Indo-Europeans mixing with the native inhabitants of Northern Europe.

    As for Angles and Saxons - they don't come into it, they lived further south in today's Germany. The Angle homeland is very close to the Danish border but on the German side. It was depopulated and described as being devoid of people once the Angles left for England. It seems the whole tribe left which is unusual because usually some would stay behind.
    Somewhat right, but also many faults.

    Danish is not what you call "north-germanic", its right definition is old norse, more specifik east norse. Swedish and danish is dialects of east norse.

    Also, Scania have always been land of dispute between Sweden and Denmark, not just something that was danish and got nicked by the swedish as you put it.

    I forgot to mention the jutes did not stop exist because of they weakened and falled under so the danes took control. What really happened was the tribes and chiefs went together to create a united Reich and so the jutes got assimilated into this united reich. And they were north-germanic, not west-germanic.
    Last edited by Vasa; 05-30-2012 at 12:58 AM.
    A knifeless man is a lifeless man

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Last Online
    10-05-2014 @ 02:26 PM
    Ethnicity
    European
    Country
    European Union
    Gender
    Posts
    9,734
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,296
    Given: 3,160

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Somewhat right, but also many faults.

    Danish is not what you call "north-germanic", its right definition is old norse, more specifik east norse. Swedish and danish is dialects of east norse.
    Yes - Old Norse is classified as North Germanic whereas Old English is West Germanic.
    I thought it too early to be talking of Old Norse when writing that which is why I used the broad term "North Germanic".

    Also, Scania have always been land of dispute between Sweden and Denmark, not just something that was danish and got nicked by the swedish as you put it.
    It has, but for the greater part of history it has been Danish and for much longer than it's been part of Sweden. Upon the formation of Denmark Scania was included. Sweden formed further north east (in the Svea lands) and only extended further south when it took control of the Geats.

    Most Germanic nations formed from a combination of the old tribes, the situation in Sweden is interesting though:

    Based on the lack of early medieval sources, and the fact that the Geats were later part of the kingdom of Sweden, traditional accounts assume a forceful incorporation by the Swedes, but the only surviving traditions which deal with Swedish-Geatish wars are of semi-legendary nature and found in Beowulf. The actual story in Beowulf, however, is that the Geatish king helps a Swede to gain the throne. What historians today think is that this realm could just as well be the force behind the creation of the medieval kingdom of Sweden. The historians make a distinction between political history and the emergence of a common Swedish ethnicity. The, so far more or less imagined, Swedish invasion of Geatish lands has been explained with Geatish involvement in the Gothic wars in southern Europe, which brought a great deal of Roman gold to Götaland, but also naturally depleted their numbers (see Nordisk familjebok).
    Today, historians believe that the medieval kingdom of Sweden was created as a union to oppose foreign forces, mainly the Danes, where the mainly inland Västergötland was easier to defend and be protected in than in the coastal areas.[9] According to Curt Weibull, the Geats would have been finally integrated in the Swedish kingdom c. 1000, but according to others, it most likely took place before the 9th century, and probably as early as the 6th century.[9] The fact that some sources are silent about the Geats indicates that any independent Geatish kingdom no longer existed in the 9th century.
    After the 15th century and the Kalmar Union, the Swedes and the Geats appear to have begun to perceive themselves as one nation, which is reflected in the evolution of svensk into a common ethnonym.[10][11] It was originally an adjective referring to those belonging to the Swedish tribe, who are called svear in Swedish. As early as the 9th century, svear had been vague, both referring to the Swedish tribe and being a collective term including the Geats,[10] and this is the case in Adam of Bremen's work where the Geats (Goths) appear both as a proper nation and as part of the Sueones.[10] The merging/assimilation of the two nations took a long time, however. In the early 20th century, Nordisk familjebok noted that svensk had almost replaced svear as a name for the Swedish people.[12]
    Today, the merger of the two nations is complete, as there is no longer any tangible identification in Götaland with a Geatish identity, apart from the common tendency of people living in those areas to refer to themselves as västgötar (West Geats) and östgötar (East Geats), that is to say, residents of the provinces of Västergötland and Östergötland. The city Göteborg, known in English as Gothenburg, was named after the Geats (Geatsburg or fortress of the Geats), when it was founded in 1621.[citation needed]
    Until 1973 the official title of the Swedish king was King of Sweden (earlier: of the Swedes), the Geats/Goths and the Wends (with the formula "Sveriges, Götes och Vendes konung"). The title "King of the Wends" was copied from the Danish title, while the Danish kings called themselves "King of the Gotlanders" (which, like "Geats", was translated into "Goths" in latin) were also used by Danish royalty. The Wends is a term normally used to describe the Slavic peoples who inhabited large areas of modern east Germany and Pomerania.
    The 15th Century is quite late compared to other Germanic countries and the Danes had by then been in Scania for centuries and it was an integral part of their kingdom.

    As for Geats - some people suggest a link between them and the Jutes, with the Jutes perhaps being Geats who settled Denmark very early in history.

  7. #7
    Genetically Engineered Ánleifr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Last Online
    01-12-2014 @ 10:30 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic & Celtic
    Ethnicity
    American
    Gender
    Posts
    751
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 23
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Albion, are the Norwegians actually just Swedes that migrated West to what is now Norway?
    "A man must accept his fate or be destroyed by it." ~Spartacus

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Last Online
    10-05-2014 @ 02:26 PM
    Ethnicity
    European
    Country
    European Union
    Gender
    Posts
    9,734
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,296
    Given: 3,160

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tuck View Post
    Albion, are the Norwegians actually just Swedes that migrated West to what is now Norway?
    No. Norway had different tribes to Sweden which consolidated into the Norwegians over time. Most modern Germanic peoples are descended from multiple tribes which were consolidated into larger ethnicities. Usually these tribes had much in common in the first place which aided in the consolidation process.

    Scandinavians are closely related but they're not the same - they're close, but different.
    Norwegians are just Norwegians.

  9. #9
    Genetically Engineered Ánleifr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Last Online
    01-12-2014 @ 10:30 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic & Celtic
    Ethnicity
    American
    Gender
    Posts
    751
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 23
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Albion View Post
    No. Norway had different tribes to Sweden which consolidated into the Norwegians over time. Most modern Germanic peoples are descended from multiple tribes which were consolidated into larger ethnicities. Usually these tribes had much in common in the first place which aided in the consolidation process.

    Scandinavians are closely related but they're not the same - they're close, but different.
    Norwegians are just Norwegians.
    Thanks, do you know what tribes would have made up present day Norway?
    "A man must accept his fate or be destroyed by it." ~Spartacus

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Last Online
    10-05-2014 @ 02:26 PM
    Ethnicity
    European
    Country
    European Union
    Gender
    Posts
    9,734
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,296
    Given: 3,160

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tuck View Post
    Thanks, do you know what tribes would have made up present day Norway?
    The Norwegians existed as a single tribe before becoming a kingdom, but they're one of the confederation-type tribes - a merger of smaller, older tribes. (Just like the Saxons were).
    If we go back further to the Iron Age then this map and article may point you in the right direction. We know little about the tribes there at this period in history.


    Notice how the Danes span the Danish Islands and Scania (Southern tip of Sweden)?

    See this article and scroll down to "inhabitants" and you'll find some info and a few tribes there.

    The Rugi in Norway are interesting - they may have been the same Rugians that were latter found in Rugen Island, Germany. The Wendish Slavs then invaded that island and assimilated the Germanic inhabitants and called themselves "Rugians" too until the island was recaptured for the Germanics and was basically re-Germanized.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Danes
    By Brännvin in forum Anthropology
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: 01-15-2015, 09:53 AM
  2. Danes propose tunnel to Sweden
    By Brännvin in forum Sverige - English Entries
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 05-31-2012, 12:41 AM
  3. The People of Denmark - The Danes
    By Storm in forum Anthropology
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 09-17-2011, 06:41 AM
  4. Danes not good to minorities
    By Brännvin in forum Danmark
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 08-27-2011, 06:34 PM
  5. Danes Have Small Testicles
    By The Journeyman in forum Health and Lifestyle
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 12-19-2010, 07:38 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •