Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 62

Thread: English Gene Pool

  1. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Last Online
    10-05-2014 @ 02:26 PM
    Ethnicity
    European
    Country
    European Union
    Gender
    Posts
    9,734
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,296
    Given: 3,160

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sleepytigers View Post
    Romans were colonizers and not settlers in most of their colonies. I'd bet that the Spanish, French, English, etc. do not actually have that much Roman ancestry by blood.

    They are probably mostly a Celtic and Germanic mixture, with something of a Basque-like Mediterranean component at times.
    Most of the "Romans" here came from Gaul and Germania so are hard to detect genetically.
    The Romans didn't settle much, they just Romanised the natives. What Romans were here largely fled once Rome left.
    The Roman component is probably less than 2% but we'll never know how many Gauls or Germanics came with them.

  2. #12
    Veteran Member Ibericus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 05:29 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Romance
    Ethnicity
    Spaniard
    Ancestry
    Castilla la Vieja
    Country
    Spain
    Region
    Castilla
    Taxonomy
    Atlantid
    Politics
    nationalism
    Religion
    España
    Gender
    Posts
    7,943
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,980
    Given: 1,061

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    None of those. They are mostly a mix of mesolithic north-euros, neolithic southerns, and bronze age invaders.

  3. #13
    Il Pensatore Apina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Online
    12-24-2012 @ 12:09 PM
    Location
    Ticino
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Romance
    Ethnicity
    Italiano, Francese, Svizzero-tedesco
    Country
    Italy
    Taxonomy
    Alpinid + Dinaro-Med
    Age
    24
    Gender
    Posts
    2,208
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 100
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Certainly I think that the phenotype of a British person depends a lot on their ancestor's location. For example, people I know from the East England generally do look more Germanic (Anglo-Saxon)/Norse, but people from the West look more Keltic/Irish.

  4. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Last Online
    10-05-2014 @ 02:26 PM
    Ethnicity
    European
    Country
    European Union
    Gender
    Posts
    9,734
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,296
    Given: 3,160

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ibericus View Post
    None of those. They are mostly a mix of mesolithic north-euros, neolithic southerns, and bronze age invaders.
    Yes, which in Britain became the British Celts when they acquired and built upon that culture.

    Same with Germanics - they have a lot of Mesolithic blood but the culture developed much latter and only partly from the earlier ones.

    This is why I speak in terms of Celts and Germanics - it makes things simpler to follow.

  5. #15
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Wildling
    Ancestry
    Cumbria, Scotland, Northumberland, Shetland
    Country
    Scotland
    Y-DNA
    R-L21*
    mtDNA
    K1C2a
    Gender
    Posts
    21,608
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 19,710
    Given: 5,851

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    It would be interesting to know exactly what England is genetically through yDNA and mtDNA. Like:
    R1b types
    R-L21 and R-L21*
    R-U152
    R1a1a types
    Z284
    L664
    Then we'll have a clearer time frame and can differentiate groups. Just now it's ok, not completely clear yet.

    http://www.eupedia.com/europe/europe...logroups.shtml
    England yDNA:-

    67% R1b
    14% I1
    4.5% I2b
    4.5% R1a
    3.5% J2
    2.5% I2*+I2a
    2.0% E1b1b
    1.5% G
    0.5% T
    0.5% Q
    and also the mtDna maternal link here
    http://www.eupedia.com/europe/europe...requency.shtml

  6. #16
    Professional Racial anthropologist
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last Online
    01-16-2014 @ 03:25 PM
    Ethnicity
    Atlantean
    Country
    Great Britain
    Age
    88
    Gender
    Posts
    16,068
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 433
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    The 0.5% Q must be from a Norse source.

  7. #17
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Last Online
    10-05-2014 @ 02:26 PM
    Ethnicity
    European
    Country
    European Union
    Gender
    Posts
    9,734
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,296
    Given: 3,160

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Thanks for the percentages Graham. Here are groups associated with those haplogroups in England then:

    67% R1b - Celts, Anglo-Saxons and Norse
    14% I1 - Danes and Anglo-Saxons
    4.5% I2b - Anglo-Saxons
    4.5% R1a Norse, Anglo-Saxons and Picts - note that Scotland and England have two different types and it's higher in Scotland.
    3.5% J2 - Neolithic Farmers
    2.5% I2*+I2a - Balkan (Romans?)
    2.0% E1b1b - Neolithic Farmers
    1.5% G - Neolithic Farmers, Sarmatians in Roman Britain and perhaps Alan (Ossetian) influence on the Franks (who settled parts of England with the Anglo-Saxons)
    0.5% T - Neolithic Farmers and perhaps some from Crusades - Middle East Christians?
    0.5% Q - Greenland Norse



    So roughly it looks like 90% is Celtic and Germanic, so my figures were about right.

  8. #18
    Professional Racial anthropologist
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last Online
    01-16-2014 @ 03:25 PM
    Ethnicity
    Atlantean
    Country
    Great Britain
    Age
    88
    Gender
    Posts
    16,068
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 433
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Albion View Post
    0.5% Q - Greenland Norse
    The Y-DNA Q branch in the Norse and British are distinctive and older than the branches of Q found among Inuits and Native Americans, y-DNA haplogroup Q1a3 have 4% frequency in South Norway and Sweden:

  9. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Last Online
    10-05-2014 @ 02:26 PM
    Ethnicity
    European
    Country
    European Union
    Gender
    Posts
    9,734
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,296
    Given: 3,160

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pallantides View Post
    The Y-DNA Q branch in the Norse and British are distinctive and older than the branches of Q found among Inuits and Native Americans, y-DNA haplogroup Q1a3 have 4% frequency in South Norway and Sweden:
    I think it must have been spread in Europe by Norse, but the question is how did they have it?
    The only other thing I can think off is perhaps Norse forays beyond Bjarmland and into Siberia. Perhaps they brought a few slaves back?

  10. #20
    Professional Racial anthropologist
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last Online
    01-16-2014 @ 03:25 PM
    Ethnicity
    Atlantean
    Country
    Great Britain
    Age
    88
    Gender
    Posts
    16,068
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 433
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    It's peculiar indeed, if it came from a northeastern route one would expect it to be found in Sami and Finns, but Q is only found at a low frequency among western Finns and not at all among the Sami.

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Prison term for pool sex HIV pair in Edinburgh
    By European blood in forum Alba | Scotland
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12-17-2011, 02:31 PM
  2. Replies: 35
    Last Post: 07-04-2011, 05:22 AM
  3. Swedish public pool to rent out burkinis
    By Vulpix in forum Sverige - English Entries
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-12-2008, 10:10 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •