0
shaved legs
shaved bush
shaved underarms
unshaved legs
unshaved bush (or neatly trimmed like a topiary)
unshaved underarms
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,387 Given: 2,630 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 48 Given: 0 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 15 Given: 0 |
To be honest, I like women that are like babies on that matter...
Thumbs Up |
Received: 14 Given: 0 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1 Given: 0 |
Women should be slightly hairy on the limbs, underarms, and bush. It shows sexual maturity and confidence. Those insisting on no hair on the body must be sexually drawn to children or reptiles.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,296 Given: 3,160 |
Legs - no, disgusting
Bush - no
Arms - prefer not but not too picky
I suppose hair around the body has become associated with uncleanliness.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 383 Given: 59 |
The amount of body hair that a woman removes or does not remove is a completely personal decision that should be respected. It is atypical in the West for a woman to let her body hair grow, but shaming a woman who does let it grow is wrong. It is one of the creeping tentacles of the unreasonable 'beauty' standard pushed by the media.
“Never forget what you are, for surely the world will not. Make it your strength. Then it can never be your weakness. Armour yourself in it, and it will never be used to hurt you.” -Tyrion Lannister, A Game Of Thrones
Thumbs Up |
Received: 12,014 Given: 18,435 |
All this "woman must shave" is a recent stuff. I don't think it was like this even 40, 60 years ago. Most people just had sex normally all around the centuries everywhere in the world without depilations and they were attracted to each other. I don't think we have an inevitable adversion to pubic or body hair in the opposite sex. It's a modern idea of beauty that has became popular due to mass globalizations. I personally am clearly influenced by this kind of thinking, though I realize that if no girl ever shaved, I could live with it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks