Differences between Anglo-Saxon type and Nordo-Faelid type

[Sandis]

In our classification system:

1: Anglo-Saxon = Keltic Nordid + Brunn (Keltic Nordid is dominant)
2: Nordo-Faelid generally = Nordid + Faelid (basically unstabilized blend?)
3: Nordo-Faelid with strong Keltic Nordid element = Keltic Nordid + Faelid (Keltic Nordid is dominant, basically unstabilized blend?)

What are the main differences?
I think it is hard to see differences between the 1st and 3rd cases and even between the 1st and 2nd cases.
It could be possible that Faelid element was significant in formation of Anglo-Saxon type because Faelids are found in quite large amounts where Anglo-Saxon type is common.
And Nordo-Faelids could be stabilized blend in some regions.
I guess geographically Anglo-Saxons are more found from British Isles to Western part of Germany while Nordo-Faelids are more found from Benelux countries to Sweden.

[Libertas]

The early Anglo-Saxons were Iron Age Nordics mixed with Bruenn and Borreby elements in Frisia and other nearby areas around the present Dutch, NW German and Danish borderlands.

There was nothing Keltic-Nordic in them.

[Septentrion]

The Anglo-Saxon is less brachycephalic, has much more Brunn elements while the Faelid has more Borreby. There will be slightly more rufosity in the Anglo-Saxon.

[Norb]

bump, I would like to know more

[Columella]

They belong to different systems.

A/S is Coon 1939. And it's a Nordic.
In Coon's scheme for Nordics A/S stands between his Small headed Hallstatt and the coarser Troender type.

The Dalic/Dalarna/WestPhalian/Falische
Is derived from Scando-German authors.

V.Eickstedt describes it within the Nordic range, but heavier built and coarser and sometimes taller.
He speculates a Cro Magnon origin and gives as perfect example V. Hindenburg.

V.Hindenburg in Coon 1939 is placed as East Baltic.

The conclusion is V.Eickstedt Dalic = Coon 1939 East Baltic.

Coon A/S = Nordic/Teuto Nordic of all other authors.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Norb]

In our classification system:

1: Anglo-Saxon = Keltic Nordid + Brunn (Keltic Nordid is dominant)
2: Nordo-Faelid generally = Nordid + Faelid (basically unstabilized blend?)
3: Nordo-Faelid with strong Keltic Nordid element = Keltic Nordid + Faelid (Keltic Nordid is dominant, basically unstabilized blend?)

What are the main differences?
I think it is hard to see differences between the 1st and 3rd cases and even between the 1st and 2nd cases.
It could be possible that Faelid element was significant in formation of Anglo-Saxon type because Faelids are found in quite large amounts where Anglo-Saxon type is common.
And Nordo-Faelids could be stabilized blend in some regions.
I guess geographically Anglo-Saxons are more found from British Isles to Western part of Germany while Nordo-Faelids are more found from Benelux countries to Sweden.

I thought Anglo-Saxon = Hallstatt + Brunn, not KN

[Odin]

I thought Anglo-Saxon = Hallstatt + Brunn, not KN

According to Coon it is.