What is your IQ level ?

[SilverKnight]

Scoring high on this tests is excellent. BUT
It is stupid to brag over forum because in an iq test sigur ros posted correct answers are given after you finish the test.
One can find solutions to half of test on the Internet so I do not see a point posting a result on a thread
If someone gets high score some wont believe etc etc

I agree with you, that it's easy to find the answers online. But I was fair and did it on my own, any questions I couldn't answer I marketed as " I don't know ". I had to do the test as my professor requested so I wanted to make it fair so I can answer my classwork in a fair way for me to learn about myself as well. I doubt this test is a reliable way to know real IQ tough, but I'm guesstimating around 100 like Pigeon mentioned as well.

[Queen B]

I don't believe in such tests, actually.
I did make such a test in school, in the 2nd grade of highschool. I got 141, the highest score, together with another guy, again from my class.

[Linet]

Yes, i have done IQ tests 3 times in my life, not on internet and my scores were good.
I will do this one too but its amazing how scores that are suposed to belong to less than 10% of the population appear in almost everyone in those internet tests.
So either these tests are not correct or some of the people lie about their results...

[Osprey]

I don't believe in such tests, actually.
I did make such a test in school, in the 2nd grade of highschool. I got 141, the highest score, together with another guy, again from my class.

Basically a person has three areas of intelligence.
Pattern Matching.
Memorizing.
Logical Ability.

Pattern Matching is trying to figure out some things that you have already seen and fitting the newer ones on the moulds of the previous ones. It helps in recognition, breaking complex problems into smaller ones and recognizing real world problems to turn them into a mathematical model.

Memorizing is basically learning.

Logical Reasoning is trying to use learned knowledge to connect to other more advanced topics. Like advancing from a leaf to a branch to the trunk, all on the basis of stored knowledge and manipulation of it.


The aim of the tests are to measure equal proportions of the first two aspects but they fail to notice is that the second aspect can overshadow the first and the third if a person is consistent enough.
Hence, their results are bogus to me.
(Including mine, too.)

[Dacul]

The results of Safinator and Horten on www.iqtest.dk are weird if both are true and images are not edited since as statistics is not that probable to have 2 members of a forum from same country scoring so high.

[gold_fenix]

118, when i did a test of 3 hours of duration with 17 years was 115 , it was with a pedagogue

[Siegfried]

141 on this test. Is that good?

[Linet]

Mmm when i did those tests...my good point were the verbal tests.... anything that had to do with words or with meaning was my field...

[Insuperable]

Try this one.
The most reliable on Internet JCTI

But I had 7 or 8 more examples to do. It was tiresome so I pushed forward buttons just to see how more examples there are and than I could not go back, I had to see my score

[Heart of Oak]

I think mine is zero!