0
I am rather new to taxonomical classification, but couldn't cranial dystrophy (something the majority of modern humans have, to varying degrees) influence classification (or rather, misclassification)? EG. someone lacking robustness and with maxillary downgrowth being interpreted as being phenotypically gracile and dolichocephalic, even if their genetics would manifest differently with a healthier early-life environment. Or should classification be based on ones' morphology no matter what?
Apologies if this has already had a thread dedicated to it. I couldn't find anything searching for it.
Bookmarks