Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: The ongoing war against Iran, from Operation Ajax to today

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    07-03-2009 @ 11:21 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    White and Swedish
    Country
    Sweden
    Gender
    Posts
    17
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default The ongoing war against Iran, from Operation Ajax to today

    Eric Margolis is one of the most well-informed Western journalists when it comes to the Middle East. As opposed to the talking heads parroting propaganda lines about anything from Israel to Tibet, he has actually travelled around Asia and talked to leaders there first hand. Here he provides the truth once again.

    http://www.lewrockwell.com/margolis/margolis152.html

    The US has laid economic siege to Iran for 30 years, blocking desperately needed foreign investment, preventing technology transfers, and disrupting Iranian trade. In recent years, the US Congress voted $120 million for anti-regime media broadcasts into Iran, and $60-75 million funding opposition parties, violent underground Marxists like the Mujahidin-i-Khalq, and restive ethnic groups like Azeris, Kurds, and Arabs under the so-called "Iran Democracy Program."

    The arm of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, remains withered from a bomb planted by the US-backed Mujahidin-i-Khalq, who were once on the US terrorist list.

    Pakistani intelligence sources put CIA’s recent spending on "black operations" to subvert Iran’s government at $400 million.

    According to an ABC News investigation, President George Bush signed a "finding" that authorized an accelerated campaign of subversion against the Islamic Republic. Washington’s goal was "regime change" in Tehran and installation of a pro-US regime of former Iranian royalist exiles.

    While the majority of protests we see in Tehran are genuine and spontaneous, Western intelligence agencies and media are playing a key role in sustaining the uprising and providing communications, including the newest electronic method, via Twitter. These are covert techniques developed by the US during recent revolutions in Ukraine and Georgia that brought pro-US governments to power.
    -Strangling the economy to make the people abandon the leaders
    -Massive funding to political parties, easily dwarfing the spending of all other political parties combined
    -Funding communist terrorists
    -Funding ethnic minorities in the hope of starting a civil war
    -Broadcasting anti-government propaganda across the border
    -CIA "black operations"
    -A "campaign of subversion" aiming to overthrow the Iranian government, signed by an American president
    -Organizing the current anti-government demonstrations

    American attacks on Iran never end. Remember, the CIA in its "Operation Ajax" helped overthrow Iran's elected leader, the wildly popular Mohammed Mossadegh, and installed the shah in his place. This because Mossadegh wanted to nationalize the country's oil, taking it from the British oil companies - and because the shah was loyal to Israel. 25 years of tyranny followed. When the people finally overthrew the shah, the Washington regime tried to strangle Iran financially. They then gave funding and supplies to their strongman in the Middle East, the brutally secular Saddam Hussein, who acted as a proxy and invaded Iran. Two million people died as a result.

    When Washington planned to invade Afghanistan, Iran offered to help through its extensive network in western Afghanistan. Iran also offered to negotiate on every point that Washington had brought up against Iran earlier, including weapons programs and support to the Hezbollah. Washington refused, and instead included Iran in an "axis of evil," a phrase invented by Jewish speech writer David Frum. Since then Washington has continually lied about Iran's nuclear program, and even presidential candidates have threatened to kill millions of Iranians with nuclear weapons. UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter has repeated over and over that Iran has always complied with the non-proliferation treaty they have signed - which, by the way, U.S. ally Israel has not signed. At all times, Israel has two or three illegal nuclear submarines (paid for by American taxpayers) outside the Iranian coast, ready to murder millions at an hour's notice.

    Iran is surrounded by nuclear powers: Washington ally Israel to the west, Washington allies India and Pakistan to the east, Russia to the north and China to the northeast. Israeli and American nuclear submarines to the south. ZOG armies have launched illegal invasions of their neighbors to the east and west. And yet Iran is painted as the bad guy. In 2008, American presidential candidates from both parties repeated the phrase "keep all options on the table," recognized as a euphemism from neocon magazines, meaning a threat of nuclear attack on Iran. This, however, was treated as completely natural, even as a requirement for the candidates. Meanwhile the Iranian president has been demonized for the phrase "wipe Israel off the map," which is a false accusation; what he really said was that the Tel Aviv regime, like the Soviet Union, would eventually "pass from the pages of time."

    Doesn't it look like there is one standard for Israel and its allies, and another standard for Israel's enemies? I wonder why that is. Could it be because of the immense Jewish dominance in American media? No, certainly not.
    Last edited by Dante; 07-03-2009 at 09:06 PM.

  2. #2
    same great taste! anonymaus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last Online
    04-14-2011 @ 09:57 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Krauty
    Gender
    Posts
    2,366
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 12
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dante View Post
    Steve Margolis
    You're referring to Eric Margolis, no doubt. The clown who said Western publications should not republish the Mohammed cartoons, that Hamas is not a terrorist organization and that Israel is implementing a "Final Solution". This is but an anaemic sample of his festering body of work.

    One may be extremely well traveled and informed, but it makes no difference if one hasn't the capacity to digest the information and extract something useful from it: nine times out of ten Eric Margolis' intellectual machinery produces naught but waste.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last Online
    02-25-2010 @ 06:09 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    .
    Ethnicity
    .
    Age
    22
    Gender
    Posts
    1,533
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 14
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    So what is the point?

    I don't care to Iran at all, if Israel and Iran are going for the war, this is not my business, that both destroy it themselves because on the next day would not do any difference to me..

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    07-03-2009 @ 11:21 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    White and Swedish
    Country
    Sweden
    Gender
    Posts
    17
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anonymaus View Post
    You're referring to Eric Margolis, no doubt. The clown who said Western publications should not republish the Mohammed cartoons, that Hamas is not a terrorist organization and that Israel is implementing a "Final Solution". This is but an anaemic sample of his festering body of work.

    One may be extremely well traveled and informed, but it makes no difference if one hasn't the capacity to digest the information and extract something useful from it: nine times out of ten Eric Margolis' intellectual machinery produces naught but waste.
    Eric Margolis, yes. A "clown"? No more than you, buddy. The Mohammed cartoons, yes - published by a Jew editor who repeatedly makes trips to meet with Zionists in Israel. A deliberate provocation to trick Whites into supporting the wars against Israel's enemies. Have you fallen for it?

    Hamas, a terrorist organization - but not the Israeli soldiers who walk down the occupied streets and shoot civilians at random. A report by an Israeli human-rights group has gathered many such examples, but I suppose you are only interested in raising fear over the primitive rockets fired by Hamas as a response to Israel's genocide policies.

    "festering." LOL I note that you couldn't refute a single point in the story! Like all those defending the Jews you choose ad hominem attacks. The Jew modus operandi is to avoid drawing attention to inconvenient facts brought up by an opponent, and instead attack the person who gathered the fact, calling him crazy, criminal, or why not "clown". Doesn't work too well, sorry. Why not bring up "anti-Semite" too? Or "racist"?

  5. #5
    NS-Drone Swarm-General RoyBatty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last Online
    02-19-2023 @ 10:27 AM
    Location
    Londonistan
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    African Baboon
    Ancestry
    Council Estate
    Country
    Great Britain
    Region
    City of London
    Politics
    National Socialist / NS Drone
    Gender
    Posts
    3,464
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 153
    Given: 39

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balder View Post
    So what is the point?

    I don't care to Iran at all, if Israel and Iran are going for the war, this is not my business, that both destroy it themselves because on the next day would not do any difference to me..
    It's simple.

    The more countries there are who suck up ZOG's time and resources the better for the rest of us. Once ZOG controls everything they'll have even more time and resources to enslave us. They're already doing it but irritating (for them) obstacles like Russia and Iran slow them down a bit.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    07-03-2009 @ 11:21 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    White and Swedish
    Country
    Sweden
    Gender
    Posts
    17
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balder View Post
    So what is the point?

    I don't care to Iran at all, if Israel and Iran are going for the war, this is not my business, that both destroy it themselves because on the next day would not do any difference to me..
    "So what is the point?" Thousands of Whites have already died in wars sold to the American public, and all Westerners, on false pretexts. "Iraq has nuclear weapons!" And now it is "Iran is making nuclear weapons!" How many have to die, and how many billions of dollars have to be wasted? Lies are lies and must be exposed. Maybe you'll care more when Iran is attacked and they mine the Gulf shut to stop the American war ships, making oil prices go through the roof. But if you don't have a car, I suppose you don't think you'll be affected?

    Actually by now I welcome such a war. Will be nice to see ZOG ships sunk, it would make a lot more Americans question why the Israeli lobby should dictate U.S. foreign policy.

  7. #7
    NS-Drone Swarm-General RoyBatty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last Online
    02-19-2023 @ 10:27 AM
    Location
    Londonistan
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    African Baboon
    Ancestry
    Council Estate
    Country
    Great Britain
    Region
    City of London
    Politics
    National Socialist / NS Drone
    Gender
    Posts
    3,464
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 153
    Given: 39

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Anti-semite is a meaningless term. It's very debateable whether many present day Jews are semitic or from Middle Eastern origin.

    If anything the term rather refers to anti Palestinian / Arab racism as practiced enthusiastically by fanatical Jewish settlers (landgrabbers) in Israel and CNN / New York Times / Faux News zombies.

    It's not really fair to blame all Jews for this though. Only the fanatics and scheissters amongst them.

  8. #8
    Novichok
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    British Isles
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Boer
    Ancestry
    Dutch, German, French Huguenot, British
    Country
    Great Britain
    Region
    Essex
    Y-DNA
    E-V13
    mtDNA
    H1b
    Taxonomy
    Norid
    Politics
    Godly
    Hero
    Jesus, the King of Kings
    Religion
    Christian
    Gender
    Posts
    60,967
    Blog Entries
    82
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 44,948
    Given: 45,034

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dante View Post
    Actually by now I welcome such a war. Will be nice to see ZOG ships sunk, it would make a lot more Americans question why the Israeli lobby should dictate U.S. foreign policy.
    ZOG Ate My Brains.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    07-03-2009 @ 11:21 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    White and Swedish
    Country
    Sweden
    Gender
    Posts
    17
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    Ah, a link about "conspiracy." And you avoid the points brought up; I suppose it is easier to shout "conspiracy nut!" and hope that settles it. Nice.

    And where did I talk about "conspiracy"? I would like to see you point that out. Nowhere? Okay, moving on.

    ZOG is the term used for the Jews who overwhelmingly dominate ownership in American media and in other countries - Sweden for example. And for those who ally with them and follow their policies. Instead of lazily posting a link about "conspiracy theories about Jews," perhaps you would like to take up some reading about actual facts - why not this to start with:

    http://www.realnews247.com/who_rules...dated_2004.htm

    That is a list of Jewish media bosses who together have American media, the world's most powerful propaganda tool, in their hands. Let's see you refute the points made. I suppose you'll do something similar to yelling "conspiracy" again, that is the usual response of those who side with the antis in this issue.

    Quote Originally Posted by RoyBatty View Post
    It's not really fair to blame all Jews for this though. Only the fanatics and scheissters amongst them.
    According to AIPAC, half of all Jews in the United States give money to the Jewish lobby groups. How many Whites give money to pro-White groups? The Jews have a history of group loyalty, which always includes eroding the nationalism in their host countries. The Jews who ran the Bolsheviks in Russia are a good example. No, it is not every single Jew. It is enough of them to say that we won't be rid of the race problem in White lands before we are rid of the Jewish race in White lands.

  10. #10
    Novichok
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    British Isles
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Boer
    Ancestry
    Dutch, German, French Huguenot, British
    Country
    Great Britain
    Region
    Essex
    Y-DNA
    E-V13
    mtDNA
    H1b
    Taxonomy
    Norid
    Politics
    Godly
    Hero
    Jesus, the King of Kings
    Religion
    Christian
    Gender
    Posts
    60,967
    Blog Entries
    82
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 44,948
    Given: 45,034

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dante View Post
    And where did I talk about "conspiracy"? I would like to see you point that out. Nowhere? Okay, moving on.
    It's not my fault that you can't see that you're yourself presenting a conspiracy theory.

    ZOG is the term used for the Jews who ...
    This term is usually used by Neo-Nazis. The vast majority of people don't recognise it as a legitimate concept.

    That is a list of Jewish media bosses who together have American media, the world's most powerful propaganda tool, in their hands. Let's see you refute the points made. I suppose you'll do something similar to yelling "conspiracy" again, that is the usual response of those who side with the antis in this issue.
    Too bad Jews seem to have superior skills in organisation management, especially as far as media is concerned. No law is stopping non-Jewish-owned organisations from growing big and strong. Maybe we can learn a lot from them.
    Help support Apricity by making a donation

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •