Exposing the Pro-Circumcision Movement

[Fortis in Arduis]

THE head of a pro-circumcision group who used to run a children's computer club was caught with a hoard of child porn.
Vernon Quaintance, from Upper Norwood, has avoided a jail term – despite having three video cassettes with nine-hours' worth of clips showing boys as young as 11 engaging in sex acts.
​
Vernon Quaintance admitted three counts of possession of indecent photographs of a child
• •
The 68-year-old is the head of the Gilgal Society, a group dedicated to promoting male circumcision.
The Old Bailey heard how police raided Quaintance's home in Henley Gardens, Upper Norwood, on April 11 last year after receiving a tip-off.
The movies seized included graphic footage of child abuse ranked at the second-highest level of severity.
Prosecuting, Frances Janusz said: "Of the five tapes seized, three were found to contain indecent images. They comprise a total of seven to nine hours.
"The children were estimated to be between 11 and 16 years old."
Robert Girling, defending, said the video tapes had been found in a box in Quaintance's office and featured films from the late 70s and early 80s.
Mr Girling told the court: "He accepts that he acquired it and it was material that he looked at the time. But 'at the time' is approaching 40 years ago.
"It was recovered from a box in his office and it was a box that he had not looked into for years and years."
Quaintance, who the court was told had been celibate for his entire life, admitted three counts of possession of indecent photographs of a child.
The retired telephone engineer was handed a 40-week jail term, suspended for two years, ordered to complete a sexual offenders rehabilitation course, and told to pay £300 costs.
According to an online profile, Quaintance is a former chairman of Croydon Computer Club, who also started a free computer group for children.
Sentencing him on Tuesday, judge Nicholas-Loraine Smith told him: "You said you had watched the videos but claimed to have got no sexual enjoyments.
"I'm afraid I very much doubt that since you retained them."
But he said Quaintance's willingness to address his problems meant he could suspend his prison sentence.
Residents in Henley Gardens, where Quaintance is known as the respected head of the local community association, were shocked to hear of his conviction. One neighbour, who did not want to be named, said: "I know he is a very religious man and is committed to the church."

http://www.thisiscroydontoday.co.uk/...ail/story.html

Circumcision is a multi-million dollar industry. Profit is reaped not only from the practice of circumcision itself, but also from the sale of harvested foreskins, the sale of products derived from harvested foreskins, and the sale of circumcision specific tools and utensils.
Contents [hide]
1 The procedure itself
2 Auxiliary tools
3 Profit from harvested foreskins
3.1 Corporate Benefactors
3.2 FDA approved products
4 Medicaid pays for it
5 Grants from pro-circumcision interest groups
6 References
The procedure itself

1.3 million baby boys are circumcised a year in the United States alone. At a dollar per procedure, that is already $1,300,000 a year. The going rate for a circumcision procedure is approximately $300 American; multiplied by 1.3 million, that is approximately $390,000,000 a year that circumcision brings in based on the procedure alone.
Auxiliary tools

Industries that depend on the practice of circumcision, particularly infant circumcision include makers of the circumstraint (the board to which a baby is strapped down to for the procedure), makers of circumcision clamps, manufacturers of circumcision kits, and other utensils used for circumcision.
Clamp manufacturers:
Gomco
Mogen (out of business)
Makers of other circumcision tools:
AccuCirc
TaraKlamp
PlastiBell
Makers of Circumcision Kits:
Priontex Products & Services
Other costs:
Anaesthetic (rarely used)
Nerve blocks
Profit from harvested foreskins

Foreskins are sold to pharmaceutical companies for stem-cell research, the creation of synthetic skin, and the creation of consumer products. Since the 1980s, private hospitals have been involved in the business of supplying discarded foreskins to private bio-research laboratories and pharmaceutical companies who require human flesh as raw research material.[1] They also supply foreskins to transnational corporations. Dr. Tania Phillips, professor of dermatology at Boston University of Medicine, insisting foreskin gathering and cultivating is scientifically and technologically "very promising." [2]
Corporate Benefactors
The following transnational corporations reap corporate profits from the sale of marketable products made from harvested human foreskins:
Advanced Tissue Sciences (ATS) [3]
Organogenesis[4]
BioSurface Technology[5]
Genzyme
Ortec International
LifeCell Corporation (Nasdaq:LIFC)
SkinMedica
FDA approved products
The following products fashioned from harvested foreskins were approved by the FDA for marketing:
Dermagraft-TC
Apligraf
AlloDerm
TNS Recovery Complex
Medicaid pays for it

While 17 states have stopped paying for it, 33 states pay for circumcision. Doctors may be driven to promote circumcision if they get a free stipend from the state.
Grants from pro-circumcision interest groups

There are pro-circumcision interest groups that give grants to doctors and researchers to "study" and promote circumcision. Organizations that do this include the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. In 2009, Schusterman Family Foundation gave a grant to mohel and professional infant circumcisor Neil Pollock to promote infant circumcision in Rwanda,[6] particularly the Mogen technique, in the name of HIV prevention.

http://www.circleaks.org/index.php?t...cial_Incentive

Ben Winkie, a "circumsexual" blogger, masturbating over a circumstraint.[1]
A circumfetishist is someone who has a sexual fixation for the circumcised penis, and/or derives sexual gratification from the act of circumcision itself [2] (see apotemnophilia and acrotomophilia). Often their sexual fantasy involves infants.[3][4] Circumfetishism often involves fantasies of power and control, which may be ritualistically acted out. Circumfetishists have at least one website[5] and three clubs.[6] The Circlist website links to a discussion group.
Circlist has always permitted, and will continue to permit, circumcision related fetish/sexual postings/materials, straight, gay or otherwise. Individuals may use Circlist to make contact with one another, including for sexual purposes. The list is not just a medical interest list, but rather all things circumcision, including circ-fetish, sexual info, medical info and a place to meet up with fellow circumcision enthusiasts and proponents.
“”
--Ben Winkie. (2005, June) International Circumsexual Symposium, Washington, D.C.

Interests: Being masturbated whilst circumcision is being discussed. Watching circumcisions with others. Etc.
“”
--Ben Winkie. Weblog

Interests: circumcision mood music
“”
--Ben Winkie. Weblog

The extent of circumfetishism among doctors and others who perform infant circumcisions is unknown.[7]
Contents [hide]
1 Circumfetish Groups
2 Historical Circumfetishism
3 Quotes
3.1 A Circlist Conversation
4 Video
5 See Also
6 External Links
7 References
Circumfetish Groups

For those who can stomach it, the comments and behaviours of proponents of circumcision would make a fruitful area of psychological study.[8] They fully bear out Woodmansey's comment that "Something must be done to help the parents who show such an irrational need...."[9] It would seem wholly plausible that inflicting circumcision on a boy provides some circumcisers and onlookers with a sexual thrill. Groups such as the Acorn Society, the Gilgal Society, and the Cutting Club openly admit to a morbid fascination with circumcision to the point of sado-masochistic fetish. These groups advertise that doctors are among their members. There are those on the Internet who discuss the erotic stimulation they experience by watching other males being circumcised, swap fiction about it, and trade in videotapes of actual circumcisions. Furthermore, there are anecdotal accounts of doctors becoming sexually aroused when circumcising boys.[10] Circumcision certainly provides an opportunity not only to handle boys' penises without the condemnation that a sexual assault (in the sense that phrase is normally used) would attract, but also the opportunity to exercise power over another human being, to alter the penis and to control it and the boy's future sexual life.[11]
Historical Circumfetishism

Mutilating the genitals of others has a deep sexual motive. This motive combined with the urge to control people when, in the nineteenth century, doctors first introduced "medicalised" circumcision in the vain attempt to prevent masturbation.[12][13]
Quotes

A Circlist Conversation
FROM: CircumcisR@hotmail...
TO: Jake H. Waskett (at Circlist Yahoo Group)
Some of us who do get erotic and sexual gratification out of not only the finished product, but also the procedure itself.
“”
--Yahoo Circlist. Message #27370, 2003 Nov.

FROM: stevemonaco@hotmail...
TO: Jake H. Waskett (at Circlist Yahoo Group)
I'm with Circumcisr on this one. Having a clipt disk is important, but how you got it is also of interest.
“”
--Yahoo Circlist. Message #27373, 2003 Nov.

FROM: Vintrest@yahoo... (John S.)
TO: Jake H. Waskett (at Circlist Yahoo Group)
As for the fact that some people find the rite of circumcision erotic, some do.
“”
--Yahoo Circlist. Message #27399, 2003 Nov.

Video

Doctor Morris L. Sorrells M.D. discusses the the sexual motives of those who circumcise, the perversion of circumfetish, doing harm to the genitals of others for a sexual thrill.
See Also

Bias -- Other reasons people are pro-circumcision.
Circlist -- A circumfetish group.
Gilgal Society -- A circumfetish group.
Acorn Society -- A circumfetish group.
Cutting Club -- A circumfetish group.
Brian J. Morris -- Member of several circumfetish groups.
Vernon Quaintance -- Member of several circumfetish groups.
Jake H. Waskett -- Member of several circumfetish groups.
External Links

Circumfetish -- Video describing circumfetishism.
Circumfetish Blog -- An actual circumfetish blog.
Circumfetish Awards -- Parody video.
Non-Therapeutic Circumcision -- Read section 2: Origins of non-therapeutic circumcision. (about circumfetishism)
Brian Morris & His Circumfetish Push to Cut The World -- Analysis of Brian Morris.
References

↑ Winkie, Ben. "The sight of a true Circumsexual?". The Little Snip. nibblebit. http://thelittlesnip.nibblebit.com/2...-circumsexual/. Retrieved 2011-08-30. Archive: http://circleaks.org/images/b/b9/The...rcumsexual.pdf
↑ "Circumsexuals". xTube. http://www.xtube.com/watch.php?v=99FcU_G322_. Retrieved 2011-04-18.
↑ Winkie, Ben (2011-03-12). "The sight of a true Circumsexual?". TheLittleSnip. Nibblebit. http://thelittlesnip.nibblebit.com/2...-circumsexual/. Retrieved 2011-04-18.
↑ Winkie, Ben (2008-08-04). "Masturbate during a Bris". TheLittleSnip. Nibblebit. http://thelittlesnip.nibblebit.com/2...during-a-bris/. Retrieved 2011-04-18.
↑ Circlist
↑ Gilgal Society, Acorn Society, Cutting Club
↑ "Frequently Used Expressions". Circumstitions. http://www.circumstitions.com/Glossary2.html. Retrieved 2011-03-08.
↑ For a mild introduction to the world of fetish circumcision and the recruitment of teenage boys for such purposes by the Gilgal Society under the guise of "medical advice," see: International Circumcision Information Reference Centre http://www.users.dircon.co.uk/~vernon/ICIRC/index.html
↑ Woodmansey AC. Circumcision. British Medical Journal 1965;2:419.
↑ Foley JM. The unkindest cut of all. Fact 1966;3(4):2-9.(July 1966).
↑ Christopher P Price. Male Non-therapeutic circumcision: The Legal and Ethical Issues. In Male and Female Circumcision, Medical, Legal, and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Practice (Denniston GC, Hodges FM and Milos MF eds.) New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 1999: 425-454. http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/price2/
↑ Moses MJ. The value of circumcision as a hygienic and therapeutic measure. New York Medical Journal 1871;14:368-74.
↑ Spratling EJ. Masturbation in the adult. Medical Record 1895;24:442-3.
Category: Motives

http://www.circleaks.org/index.php?title=Circumfetish

[Fortis in Arduis]

Bias
Pro-Circumcision Bias

Giving Undue Weight
See Also:
Circumfetish

Where a source seeks to convince by a claim of authority or by personal observation, it is generally well accepted that an "authority" needs to be objective and impartial, and that an audience can only evaluate information from a source if they know about conflicts of interest that may affect the objectivity of the source.
Some authorities pretend to have an objective and impartial point of view regarding the practice of circumcision, when in fact, they have a special, vested interest in defending the practice; they have a bias in favor of circumcision, which poses a conflict of interest for said authorities.
A circumcision bias may cause one to view the practice of circumcision in a positive light, to welcome evidence that it is medically beneficial, perhaps even necessary or required, and to dismiss arguments and evidence to the contrary. Positive findings may be exaggerated, and negative findings may be minimized, if they are reported at all.
There are three primary factors that may cause somebody to have a bias in favor circumcision; culture, religion, and personal experience.
See Circumfetish to learn about a bias sicker than the rest.

Contents [hide]
1 Cultural Bias
1.1 American Bias
2 Religious Bias
2.1 Jewish Influence on Circumcision Literature
2.1.1 Circumcision Discourse and the Jewish Presence
2.2 Circumcision and Islam
3 Personal Bias
4 "Anti-circumcision Bias"
5 So who's biased?
6 See Also
7 References
Cultural Bias

A scientist or researcher of circumcision may have a cultural bias in favor of circumcision if (s)he comes from a country, society, cultural background, or ethnic group where circumcision is common. A cultural bias is a conflict of interest because reporting accurate findings in studies regarding circumcision is at odds with what one has been conditioned to believe about the practice. A person may be circumcised himself, married to a circumcised spouse, and/or a parent to circumcised children.
Circumcision is near-universal in the United States, Israel, the Philippines, and most Arab nations. Circumcision is also considered a rite of passage in some African tribes. In these societies, a man who has not been circumcised is often considered to be inferior, and in some cases, a social outcast, so there is a strong incentive to circumcise one's self and/or one's children.
American Bias
Because the United States circumcises so many of its male infants, circumcision is often said to be an American cultural value, and it is accepted as “normal.” Cultural bias on this issue may be most obvious when considering the practice of female circumcision in Africa. Americans regard the practice with horror, the way Europeans, who do not cut the genitals of male or females, regard American circumcision.[1]
American bias in favor of circumcision could be attributed to a number of different factors. The history of circumcision in America goes back at least a century, when it began as a way to curb masturbation in boys and men.[2] Thereafter American doctors began on a quest to medicalize the practice of circumcision as a preventor of a myriad of diseases, and that endeavor continues to this day.
As a result of the long history of doctors condemning the presence of the foreskin and expounding the virtues of circumcision, curriculum regarding the foreskin and its function remain largely absent from American medical literature. Information on the proper development of the foreskin is largely absent, diagrams of male genitalia present the penis as circumcised, and if the foreskin is mentioned at all, it is in the context of circumcision. In short, most of what is taught in American medicine regarding the foreskin is how to cut it off.
Another factor that plays a role in instilling bias in favor of circumcision in America is the local media. American television and theater treats the presence of the foreskin with ridicule and disdain, and praises circumcision as "clean" and "healthy," and news outlets are always ready to publish the latest "study" (usually conducted by American "researchers") that shows circumcision might have some kind of "benefit." Editors may also believe that American audiences, who already believe circumcision is beneficial, will want to read stories reinforcing their cultural assumptions. By contrast, a study showing no benefit (or even negative findings), may not be considered "news" by editors if their audience is expected to have little interest. Tabloid-type media especially may not want anything other than simplistic stories. Discussions carefully evaluating the validity of conflicting findings may be off-puttingly complex and not especially interesting to the reader who already believes circumcision as healthy, and see no need for further debate. These stories therefore might be less likely to be published.

Circumcision practices are largely culturally determined and as a result there are strong beliefs and opinions surrounding its practice. It is important to acknowledge that researchers' personal biases and the dominant circumcision practices of their respective countries may influence their interpretation of findings.
“”
Siegfried et al. "Male circumcision for prevention of heterosexual acquisition of HIV in men." Cochrane Library 3 (2003)

Religious Bias



Cultural or religious importance to circumcision may pre-dispose one to view the practice of circumcision in a positive light, to welcome evidence that it is medically beneficial, perhaps even necessary or required, and to dismiss arguments and research to the contrary.
Like anyone else, a scientist or researcher of circumcision may have a bias in favor of circumcision if s/he adheres to a religion where circumcision is a religious requirement. A religious bias is a conflict of interest because reporting accurate findings in studies regarding circumcision is at odds with a conviction to defend what has been a historically controversial and ethically problematic religious practice.
Circumcision is viewed as a religious requirement in Judaism. It is also considered an important religious tenet in Islam by many, though it is not mentioned in the Koran; not all adherents of Islam are circumcised or consider circumcision to be a requirement. People in some sects of Christianity, such as Coptic Christians, consider circumcision to be a religious requirement, though it is expressly forbidden to gentiles (see Galatians 5).
Circumcision is an important, often indispensable religious custom for many religious people, and attempts to question its propriety are often seen as blasphemous. Yet, there is a recognition that medical validity is important to maintain justification for the surgery.

Jewish Influence on Circumcision Literature
Though American circumcision practice is generally believed to be independent of Jewish circumcision practice, they are connected; some of the most outspoken advocates for circumcision tend to be Jewish. This suggests a religious or cultural bias on the part of these advocates. Of course, there are also Jewish doctors that oppose circumcision, but they are disproportionately outnumbered by those who advocate circumcision. For example, of all the letters to the editor in response to the 1999 American Academy of Pediatrics Circumcision Policy Statement, the most pro-circumcision responses were from Jewish doctors, including two whom also perform Jewish ritual circumcisions.[3][4][5] The voices of Jewish doctors--Wolbarst, Ravich, Weiss, Fink, Schoen, and others--are disproportionately prominent in circumcision advocacy.
Although physicians may act with what they consider to be sound medical judgement, some Jewish physicians may be influenced also by non-medical consideration. Cultural background of many Jewish circumcision advocates predisposes them to view the practice in a positive light, to welcome evidence that the most particular and problematic religious custom of their people is medically beneficial, and to dismiss arguments to the contrary. The presence of a large and influential population of Jewish physicians in this country, their concentration in leading centers of research and publication, and their remarkably active participation in the century-long debate on circumcision seems too obvious and too significant to be rejected out of hand, or worse, to be avoided because it might be wrongly interpreted as gratuitous defamation.[6] According to a MEDLINE search, Edgar Schoen, a strong Jewish advocate, has been published 20 times in the medical literature on the subject of circumcision.
Circumcision Discourse and the Jewish Presence
According to the AAP Circumcision Policy Statement of 1999, in regards to infant circumcision, "It is legitimate for parents to take into account cultural, religious, and ethnic traditions, in addition to the medical factors." Furthermore, "parents of all male infants should be given accurate and unbiased information and be provided the opportunity to discuss this decision," and that they should "should not be coerced by medical professionals to make this choice."[7]
The AAP puts physicians in a difficult position; on the one hand, they should be giving accurate and unbiased information to parents, but on the other, providing any information discouraging circumcision would put doctors in a position of attacking religious belief. This suggests that religion may be a factor that inhibits the full disclosure of medical information and medical views on circumcision and that American discussion or questioning of the issue is affected by the Jewish presence. Therefore, the creators of this wiki believe that mentioning religious affiliation is relevant to assessing potential bias when it comes to the subject of circumcision.
Circumcision and Islam
Although circumcision is never mentioned in the Qur'an, male circumcision is deeply rooted in the Muslim tradition. Muhammad is reported to have prescribed cutting the foreskin as a fitrah, a measure of personal cleanliness. Modern Muslims see circumcision as essential to their faith, although they have also come to lean on arguments of "medical benefits." A conference of Islamic scholars in 1987 stated that modern circumcision studies “[reflect] the wisdom of the Islamic statements”.[8]
Personal Bias

Like anyone else, a scientist or researcher of circumcision may have a personal bias in favor of circumcision if he is circumcised, a father of circumcised children, or if she is married to a circumcised partner and/or is a mother of circumcised children. A personal bias is a conflict of interest, because reporting accurate findings in studies regarding circumcision is at odds with a personal interest in defending the irrevocable procedure of circumcision for one's self, a circumcised spouse, or one's circumcised children. The interests of a circumcision "researcher" may also lie in a personal sexual fixation with the circumcised penis and/or the act of circumcision itself. (See circumfetish.)
"Anti-circumcision Bias"

Advocates of circumcision may claim there is an "anti-circumcision bias" in research and in public health policy. They support their claim only with their judgment that substantial medical evidence favors their view.[9] It is significant that circumcision advocates never offer any rationale or research to explain why someone would have an anti-circumcision bias and why, for example, some circumcised men, Jews, and doctors who performed routine circumcisions (and stopped) would adopt a position opposing circumcision that is not evidence-based.[10]
So who's biased?

It is very easy to make the claim that opponents of circumcision have an "anti-circumcision bias." When determining bias, it is important to do so considering the greater scope of medicine. Usually, medicine aims to cure or prevent disease placing primacy in the preservation of the integrity of the human body; surgery and/or the amputation or extraction of body parts is usually reserved as a very last resort, when there is a medical condition present that necessitates it, and when all other methods of treatment have failed.
Circumcision "research" is unique in that no other "study" or "research" aims to vilify a particular, normally ocurring body part to necessitate, even require, its deliberate destruction. While most other research seeks to prevent or cure disease in order to avoid surgery, or the loss of a body part, circumcision "research" seeks to necessitate the amputation of normal, healthy tissue.
The creators of this wiki believe that wanting to prevent disease while preserving the integrity of the human body is a perfectly acceptable, even prefered bias to have in medical research, if it could even be called that.
See Also

Circumfetish -- A bias sicker than the rest.
References

↑ "Cultural and Medical Bias". Circumcision Resource Center. Archived from the original on 2011-03-06. http://www.circumcision.org/bias.htm. Retrieved 2011-03-06.
↑ McLaren, Carie. "Porn Flakes: Kellogg, Graham, and the Crusade for Moral Fiber". Stay Free! Magazine. Archived from the original on 2011-03-06. http://www.ibiblio.org/stayfree/10/graham.htm. Retrieved 2011-03-06. "The operation should be performed by a surgeon without administering an anesthetic..."
↑ Bailis S. Circumcision: the debate goes on. Pediatrics 2000;105:682.
↑ Kunin S. Circumcision: the debate goes on. Pediatrics 2000;105:683.
↑ Shechet J, Tanenbaum B. Circumcision: the debate goes on. Pediatrics 2000;105:682-683.
↑ Glick, Leonard (2005). ""This Little Operation", Jewish American Physicians and Twentieth-Century Circumcision Advocacy". Marked in Your Flesh. New York, New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 183-184. ISBN 0-19-517674-X. "The presence of a large and influential population of Jewish physicians in this country..."
↑ AAP Task Force on Circumcision. Circumcision Policy Statement. Pediatrics 1999;103(3):686-693. http://aappolicy.aappublications.org...103/3/686#B119 AAP Policy Statement 1999 Retreived 2011-03-13
↑ Gollaher, David L. Circumcision: A History of the World's Most Controversial Surgery. New York: Basic Books, 2000.
↑ Schoen E, Wiswell T, Moses S. New policy on circumcision: Cause for concern. Pediatrics 2000; 105: 620-623.
↑ "Cultural and Medical Bias". Circumcision Resource Center. http://www.circumcision.org/bias.htm. Retrieved 2011-05-10. "Circumcision was more often supported by doctors who were circumcised."
Category: Motives
page discussion view source history
Log in
navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
search

toolbox
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Printable version
Permanent link

This page was last modified on 9 October 2011, at 21:46. This page has been accessed 8,065 times. Privacy policy About CircLeaks

http://www.circleaks.org/index.php?title=Bias

[Fortis in Arduis]

The Gilgal Society is a UK-based not-for-profit organization administered by (Circlist moderator) Vernon Quaintance.[3] Gilgal is Hebrew for "hill of foreskins." [4]
Groups such as the Gilgal Society, the Acorn Society, and the Cutting Club openly admit to a morbid fascination with circumcision to the point of sado-masochistic fetish. These groups advertise that doctors are among their members. There are those on the Internet who discuss the erotic stimulation they experience by watching other males being circumcised, swap fiction and about it, and trade in videotapes of actual circumcisions.[5]
Contents [hide]
1 Some Members and Associates of Gilgal Include [6]
2 Gilgal Porn
2.1 Stories
2.2 Videos
3 See Also
4 References
Some Members and Associates of Gilgal Include [6]

Many of these people are the authors of the most recent pro-circumcision papers published in various medical journals (these works are used to push for circumcision in the media and through government organizations). Click their names for more information.
Bertran Auvert, MD, PhD
Robert C. Bailey, Ph.D.
Stefan Bailis, MA
Xavier Castellsagué, MD PhD
Mike Cormier
Guy Cox, DPhil
Ilene Gelbaum, RN NOAM
Daniel Halperin, PhD
Dawn Harvey, MA
Sam Kunin, MD
Brian J. Morris, PhD
Edgar J. Schoen, MD
Roger Short, AM FRS ScD
Howard J. Stang, MD
Jake H. Waskett
Helen Weiss, PhD
Robin Willcourt, MD
Thomas E. Wiswell, MD
A quick search for these names in PubMed reveals that these are the most common "researchers" and editors of the latest circumcision to prevent HIV research, which is being funded the American government, and the World Bank.
Gilgal Porn

Stories
The Gilgal Society published a book containing stories eroticizing the circumcision of minors.
Published by The Gilgal Society
He had not reached puberty but soon would: a few hairs were starting to grow at the base of his penis. Neil was then asked to lie on the couch for the penis to be photographed. ...the doctor tested the fit of two sizes of Gomco Clamp bell. During this procedure Neil erected, but was not embarrassed by it and made no attempt to hide it.
Mark came in next and again dropped his trousers readily. He had reached puberty and was quite well developed. ... Its like an elephants trunk was the doctors comment, to which Mark heartily agreed. ... Photographs of his penis were taken...
He had realised after sex education lessons at school that he had a problem.
...the boys were given plenty of wine to relax them. ...the discussion was about the sex lives of the boys and their school friends. The doctor asked how often the boys wanked. ... The doctor showed the boys his microscope and asked if they had ever seen sperm under one. ... He suggested to Mark that if he wanted to, he could have a quiet wank whilst Neil was being circumcised... This was eagerly accepted. ... He lay back with his eyes closed and just let the doctor get on.
He returned to the surgery and put on his underpants (tight jockey briefs). His penis was guided up against his abdomen... Photographs had been taken...
We all returned to the lounge where Mark was watching TV, having had his quiet wank. ...the doctor put some of Marks semen on a slide and put it under the microscope on high power. Each of us looked at the live sperm swimming vigorously around in the semen.
...there is hope that the circumcision will give him the confidence to overcome his enuresis [bed wetting].
The boys also looked at the book and noted a number of horrors which they would be spared now that they were circumcised.
On this occasion there were three boys to be circumcised, two of them brothers aged 8 and 10. The doctor had planned to take the younger one first... ...did not need circumcision, but it was being done for uniformity with his brother
He went down fighting and, because he had just been screaming, appeared to stop breathing. This worried his father, but the doctor said it was quite normal...
Ians foreskin was long... ...it needed to come off.
After lunch we had a five-year-old to do. ... Robert has shown his off to his school-friends. I hope some of them ask their parents if they can have their penis circumcised too.

-- Acknowledgements to VQ [Vernon Quaintance]
“”
Case histories and experiences of circumcision. Circumcision: An Ethomedical Study (p.191). Gilgal Society. [7][8]




Gilgal Circumcision Porn Book


infocirc.com is also registered to Vernon Quaintance on behalf of The Gilgal Society. According to the main page "The International Circumcision Information Reference Centre is sponsored by The Gilgal Society"[9]
Videos
Gilgal offers a circumcision VHS tape that you can order from their website. It is "unlabelled to allow your own discretion on labeling".[10]
See Also

Vernon Quaintance -- Creator of the Gilgal Society.
Brian J. Morris -- Member of the Gilgal Society.
Bertran Auvert -- Associates with the Gilgal Society.
Robert C. Bailey -- Associates with the Gilgal Society.
Daniel T. Halperin -- Associates with the Gilgal Society.
Brian J. Morris -- Associates with the Gilgal Society.
Jake H. Waskett -- Associates with the Gilgal Society.
Thomas E. Wiswell -- Associates with the Gilgal Society.
Circlist -- Related group.
Acorn Society -- Related group.
Cutting Club -- Related group.
References

Note: If a link is broken, you will find a PDF archive link directly behind it (under the same reference number).
↑ Quaintance, Vernon. "Qreunion". http://web.archive.org/web/200010260...nce_Vernon.jpg. Retrieved 2011-03-09.
↑ "Whois Record For GilgalSoc.org". Domain Tools. http://whois.domaintools.com/gilgalsoc.org. Retrieved 2011-03-09.
↑ "WHOIS information for gilgalsoc.org". WhoIS.net. http://www.whois.net/whois/gilgalsoc.org. Retrieved 2011-04-27.
↑ "Gilgal". Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilgal. Retrieved 2011-04-27.
↑ Christopher P Price. Male Non-therapeutic circumcision: The Legal and Ethical Issues. In Male and Female Circumcision, Medical, Legal, and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Practice (Denniston GC, Hodges FM and Milos MF eds.) New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 1999: 425-454. http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/price2/
↑ Morris, Brian (2007). Vernon Quaintance. ed. Sex and circumcision: What every woman needs to know.. London, England: Gilgal Society. http://www.circinfo.net/pdfs/GFW-EN%200712-1.pdf.
↑ Thomas, A. (2005). "Case histories and experiences of circumcision". In Vernon Quaintance. Circumcision: An Ethomedical Study. Fourth Edition. London, England: The Gilgal Society. pp. 191. EMS-EN 0304-2. http://www.circleaks.org/images/d/d6/Gilgal_porn.pdf.
↑ Shaw, Tony. "Circumcision, an ethnomedical study: A review by Tony Shaw". Gilgal Society. Gilgal Society. http://www.gilgalsoc.org/b_reviews/ethnomed.html. Retrieved 2011-02-28.
↑ "Whois Record For InFocIrc.com". Domain Tools. http://whois.domaintools.com/infocirc.com. Retrieved 2011-03-09.
↑ Quaintance, Vernon. "Adult Circumcision Video". Gilgal Society. http://www.gilgalsoc.org/publications/acv.html. Retrieved 2011-03-11. Archive: File:Gilgal Video.pdf

http://www.circleaks.org/index.php?title=Gilgal_Society

[Blackout]

Nothing wrong with being circumcised. If anything, it's great!

[Bobby Martnen]

So people who enjoy chopping up little boys' penises turn out to be pedophiles?

Why am I not surprised...