Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Mongoloid DNA in Central Asian Turkic and others ( Europeans, Non-Turkic )

  1. #1
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Online
    07-05-2019 @ 08:31 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    British irish
    Ethnicity
    British
    Country
    England
    Gender
    Posts
    11,137
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,314
    Given: 71

    0 Not allowed!

    Default Mongoloid DNA in Central Asian Turkic and others ( Europeans, Non-Turkic )

    Hi, I want to make an thread about the genetic influence of Mongolians around the world and their descendants.

    Genetics tell us Kazakhs, Hazara, Crimean Tatars were mostly the result of Mongoloid men (Y-DNA) who mated with Indo-European women (mtDNA). Uyghurs, Uzbeks, Kygyz are mostly the result of Indo-European men (Y-DNA) and Mongoloid women (mtDNA). Mongolian Caucasian mtDNA is 14.3% AND Y-DNA is 6%. So It would seem Central Asia have been heavily shaped from Intermarriage and assimilation. These Mongol hybrids can also be found the Hazara of middle east, and the Nogai of southern Russia and Caucasus but not in the rest of Europe.



    Autosomal DNA


    Kazakhs, Kyrgyz are the most mongoloid being from 60-75% Mongoloid
    Uzbeks on average 42-47% Mongoloid, some are 30-40% or 60-70%. Mongoloid
    Uyghurs on average 50-52% Mongoloid, some are 46 - 60% Mongoloid
    Turkmen on average are 16% Mongoloid, some are 27-31% Mongoloid

    Kuban Nogais ( <---- Kuban nogais are only 3% of Nogais and may have mixed with the Caucasus people, they do not live in the same territory like the vast majority of Nogais in republic of Nogay)

    Kuban Nogais average 23.5% Mongoloid, some are 26.5 - 36.5% Mongoloid.

    Haplogroup C3 in the world

    C3 6-12% Northern China
    C3 11-16% Koreans
    C3 Hazara in Pakistan 40% O3 8%
    C3 Hazara in Afghanistan 33.33% O3 1.57%
    C3 Tajiks in Afghanistan 3.57% , O3 9%
    C3 Pasthun in Afghanistan 2.56%
    C3 Pasthun in Afghanistan 5%
    C3 Assyrians in Iran 2.6%
    C3 Bandari in Iran 0.8%
    C3 Manzandarani in Iran 1.4%
    C3 Zoroasterian in In ran 2.6%
    C3 Bengalis in West Bengal 3.2%
    C3 Indian in new Dehli 0.6%
    C3 Hunza 5% and O3 5%
    C3 Russians 0.2% or 0.7%


    Iran ethnic minority groups




    Russians

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...76/table/tbl2/

    Rovslav 0.9%
    Belgorod 0.7%

    Central Russian total 0.2%
    Southern Russian total 0.2%


    Afghanistan and Pakistan ethnic minority

    " Afghanistan's Ethnic Groups Share a Y-Chromosomal Heritage Structured by Historical Events"

    http://ukpmc.ac.uk/articles/PMC3314501/

    "Haplogroup C3 in Uzbeks (41.18%) and Hazaras (33.33%) than it was in Tajiks (3.57%) and Pashtuns (2.04%). On the other hand, R1a1a-M17 was significantly more frequent (p = 3.00×10−6) in Pashtuns (51.02%) and Tajiks (30.36%) than in Uzbeks (17.65%) and Hazaras (6.67%). RM networks of C3-M217 (Figure S1A) and R1a1a-M17 "


    Haplogroup C3 and O3

    Uzbeks/ Afghanistan 41.18% C3 + 5.9% O3

    Hazara/ Pakistan 40% C3 + 8% O3

    Hazaras/ Afghanistan 33.33% C3 + O3 2.56%

    Tajiks/Afghanistan 3.57% C3 + O3 9%

    Pashtuns Afghanistan 2.04% C3

    Pashtun Pakistan 5% C3


    Tatars ( Russian ethnic minority )


    BASHKIR TATARS

    C3 it's found highest at 17% at highest
    O it's found highest at 6% at highest
    N-P43 it's found highest at 3% highest

    N-tat = N1c1, it's found from as low as 3% to as high as 65% ( I'm not sure if this spread by Finno ugric or by Yakuts or Uralic people, at least some of them)



    Mongolian themselves are genetically 81-95% Mongoloid, east Mongolians being almost 100% Mongoloid and West Mongolians being a bit over 81% Mongoloid.





    C3 is found highest in Siberia, Mongolian, Manchus, Eskimo, Inuits. It's founds in Koreans, Chinese, Japanese. All of Central Asian Turkic, Tajiks, Pakistan, Afghanistan, India, Turkey, Southern Russia, Caucasus. It's found in highest in the Hazara of middle east, the Nogais of Caucasus and the Crimean Tatars of East europe in Ukraine. The Kazakhs have very high C3 as do the Uzbeks of Afghanistan.

    Mongolian hybrids

    Hazara
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1181978/

    mtDNA 52% West Eurasian, 13% South Asian/Indian, 35% East Asian
    Y-DNA 48%-52% East Asian 40% C3, 8% O3. West Eurasian and South Asian make up the rest.

    Many Hazara appearance can range from middle easterner, European, mongoloid.




    Nogais are descendants from the golden horde.

    East Asian Y-DNA 19-25% like 13% C3, 6% O3, D 6%, East Asian mtDNA 39%
    http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/9/47


    Crimean Tatars

    East Asian Y-DNA 19% like 9% C3, 5% O, 5% O3. West Eurasian mtDNA 100%.
    http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/9/47/table/T2

    Appearance of some Crimean Tatars look mixed with mongoloids


    Last edited by ButlerKing; 11-02-2012 at 09:51 PM.

  2. #2
    Brudne żydowskie świnie Blackout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Last Online
    11-10-2013 @ 02:36 PM
    Ethnicity
    Vampires
    Ancestry
    Space
    Country
    European Union
    Gender
    Posts
    2,132
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,150
    Given: 11,095

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Interesting stuff, thanks! There are also other Mongolic tribes aswell, such as the 'Balti' people, and 'Ladakhi' etc.
    Baseball Bat + Orange = Juice

  3. #3
    Veteran Member Sky earth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Last Online
    01-28-2015 @ 10:40 PM
    Location
    Rhineland
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Turkic
    Ethnicity
    Turkish
    Country
    Turkey
    Region
    North Rhine
    Religion
    Monotheism
    Age
    19
    Gender
    Posts
    1,198
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 498
    Given: 214

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Why do Crimean tatars have 0 % Mongoloid mtDNA? I know that Crimean Tatar men mixed with the local women in Ukraine but I expect at least 5 %

    It's strange because most Turkics have their Mongoloid haplogroups on their maternal side.
    Last edited by Sky earth; 12-27-2012 at 09:08 AM.

  4. #4
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Online
    07-05-2019 @ 08:31 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    British irish
    Ethnicity
    British
    Country
    England
    Gender
    Posts
    11,137
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,314
    Given: 71

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sky earth View Post
    Why do Crimean tatars have 0 % Mongoloid mtDNA? I know that Crimean Tatar men mixed with the local women in Ukraine but I expect at least 5 %

    It's strange because mot Turkics have their Mongoloid haplogroups on their maternal side.
    Maybe because men only migrated...? not really sure to be honest.

    Mainly more Caucasoid haplogroup maternal than paternal =

    Crimean Tatar
    Kazakh
    Hazara
    Uzbeks Afghan
    Kamlyks
    Buryats
    Mongolian

    Mainly more Mongoloid haplogroup maternal DNA than paternal =

    Kyrgyz
    Uyghurs
    Uzbeks in Uzbekistan
    Nogais
    Bashkir Tatar
    Altay
    Turkmen
    Turkish

    As for Karakalpaks they have more caucasoid mtDNA than Mongoloid mtDNA but also more Caucasoid Y-DNA and besides they all look mixed.
    Last edited by ButlerKing; 12-27-2012 at 09:54 AM.

  5. #5
    Veteran Member Sky earth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Last Online
    01-28-2015 @ 10:40 PM
    Location
    Rhineland
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Turkic
    Ethnicity
    Turkish
    Country
    Turkey
    Region
    North Rhine
    Religion
    Monotheism
    Age
    19
    Gender
    Posts
    1,198
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 498
    Given: 214

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ButlerKing View Post
    Maybe because men only migrated...? not really sure to be honest.

    Mainly Caucasoid haplogroup maternal =

    Crimean Tatar
    Kazakh
    Hazara
    Uzbeks Afghan
    Kamlyks
    Buryats
    Mongolian

    Mainly Mongoloid haplogroup maternal =

    Kyrgyz
    Uyghurs
    Uzbeks in Uzbekistan
    Nogais
    Bashkir Tatar
    Altay
    Turkmen
    Turkish

    As for Karakalpaks they have more caucasoid mtDNA than Mongoloid mtDNA but also more Caucasoid Y-DNA and besides they all look mixed.


    Karakalpaks are in Autosomal Dna on the same Level as Kazakhs and Kyrgyz. I doubt that they have predominantly Caucasoid haplogroups on both sides.

  6. #6
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Online
    07-05-2019 @ 08:31 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    British irish
    Ethnicity
    British
    Country
    England
    Gender
    Posts
    11,137
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,314
    Given: 71

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sky earth View Post
    Karakalpaks are in Autosomal Dna on the same Level as Kazakhs and Kyrgyz. I doubt that they have predominantly Caucasoid haplogroups on both sides.

    So not true.... Karakapak are still 10% more Caucasoid than Kazakhs and Kyrgyz.

    -------------

    Check out these two Crimean Tatars.... it's so obvious these ones don't look European. They must have higher East Asian DNA on average for sure.



    I'm surprised by how high the Mongolian DNA is North Caucasus which is today's modern day Southern Russia compared with ethnic Slavs like Russians.
    This means that Mongols did leave significant genetic impact in parts of Europe.

    The Caucasus as an asymmetric semipermeable barrier to ancient human migrations

    Bayazit Yunusbayev et al.

    Abstract

    " The Caucasus, inhabited by modern humans since the Early Upper Paleolithic and known for its linguistic diversity, is considered to be important for understanding human dispersals and genetic diversity in Eurasia. We report a synthesis of autosomal, Y chromosome and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) variation in populations from all major subregions and linguistic phyla of the area. Autosomal genome variation in the Caucasus reveals significant genetic uniformity among its ethnically and linguistically diverse populations, and is consistent with predominantly Near/Middle Eastern origin of the Caucasians, with minor external impacts. In contrast to autosomal and mtDNA variation, signals of regional Y chromosome founder effects distinguish the eastern from western North Caucasians. Genetic discontinuity between the North Caucasus and the East European Plain contrasts with continuity through Anatolia and the Balkans, suggesting major routes of ancient gene flows and admixture. "





    North East Caucasian ethnic

    Tabasaran 43 samples, 3 C3 = 6.97%

    North West Caucasian ethnic

    Adyghe 154 samples, 1 C3c and 3 C3 = 2.59%
    Cherkessians 126 sampes, 1 C3 = 0.79%
    Karbadin 140 samples, 3 C3 = 2.40%

    North East Central Caucasian ethnic

    Kuban Nogays 87 samples , 5 C3 and 2 C3c and 3 O3 = 11.49%
    Kara Nogays 76 samples, 8 C3 and 4 O3 = 15.78%

    ( Not including haplogroup D, N and Q in Nogays because such markers have nothing to do with Mongolian people )

    South Caucasus

    Abazinians 14 samples, 1 C3 = 7%

    Tabasaran


    Adyghe


    Karbadin

  7. #7
    Veteran Member Sky earth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Last Online
    01-28-2015 @ 10:40 PM
    Location
    Rhineland
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Turkic
    Ethnicity
    Turkish
    Country
    Turkey
    Region
    North Rhine
    Religion
    Monotheism
    Age
    19
    Gender
    Posts
    1,198
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 498
    Given: 214

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ButlerKing View Post
    So not true.... Karakapak are still 10% more Caucasoid than Kazakhs and Kyrgyz.

    -------------

    Check out these two Crimean Tatars.... it's so obvious these ones don't look European. They must have higher East Asian DNA on average for sure.



    I'm surprised by how high the Mongolian DNA is North Caucasus which is today's modern day Southern Russia compared with ethnic Slavs like Russians.
    This means that Mongols did leave significant genetic impact in parts of Europe.

    The Caucasus as an asymmetric semipermeable barrier to ancient human migrations

    Bayazit Yunusbayev et al.

    Abstract

    " The Caucasus, inhabited by modern humans since the Early Upper Paleolithic and known for its linguistic diversity, is considered to be important for understanding human dispersals and genetic diversity in Eurasia. We report a synthesis of autosomal, Y chromosome and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) variation in populations from all major subregions and linguistic phyla of the area. Autosomal genome variation in the Caucasus reveals significant genetic uniformity among its ethnically and linguistically diverse populations, and is consistent with predominantly Near/Middle Eastern origin of the Caucasians, with minor external impacts. In contrast to autosomal and mtDNA variation, signals of regional Y chromosome founder effects distinguish the eastern from western North Caucasians. Genetic discontinuity between the North Caucasus and the East European Plain contrasts with continuity through Anatolia and the Balkans, suggesting major routes of ancient gene flows and admixture. "





    North East Caucasian ethnic

    Tabasaran 43 samples, 3 C3 = 6.97%

    North West Caucasian ethnic

    Adyghe 154 samples, 1 C3c and 3 C3 = 2.59%
    Cherkessians 126 sampes, 1 C3 = 0.79%
    Karbadin 140 samples, 3 C3 = 2.40%

    North East Central Caucasian ethnic

    Kuban Nogays 87 samples , 5 C3 and 2 C3c and 3 O3 = 11.49%
    Kara Nogays 76 samples, 8 C3 and 4 O3 = 15.78%

    ( Not including haplogroup D, N and Q in Nogays because such markers have nothing to do with Mongolian people )

    South Caucasus

    Abazinians 14 samples, 1 C3 = 7%

    Tabasaran


    Adyghe


    Karbadin

    You created a Thread once to show the Autosomal Dna of Turkics and central Asians. The colours of Karakalpaks, Kyrgyz and Kazakhs were almost the same and even if they have 10 % more Caucasoid than Kazakhs and Kyrgyz, they are still more Mongoloid, because Kazakhs and Kyrgyz are roughly 30 % caucasoid.

  8. #8
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Online
    07-05-2019 @ 08:31 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    British irish
    Ethnicity
    British
    Country
    England
    Gender
    Posts
    11,137
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,314
    Given: 71

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sky earth View Post
    You created a Thread once to show the Autosomal Dna of Turkics and central Asians. The colours of Karakalpaks, Kyrgyz and Kazakhs were almost the same and even if they have 10 % more Caucasoid than Kazakhs and Kyrgyz, they are still more Mongoloid, because Kazakhs and Kyrgyz are roughly 30 % caucasoid.

    Well yes but still the Karakalpaks are still 40-45% Caucasoid, every percentage counts in my opinion.


    Uzbeks and Uyghurs are roughly the same but difference is that Uzbeks are still slightly more Caucasoid 53-57% than Mongoloid 43-47% and this means their appearance will still be slightly more caucasoid. Some are even more Caucasoid than some Turkmen reaching 75% Caucasoid and some at 60% Mongoloid but this don't mean their closer to Turkmen or Kazakh they are still the closest to Uyghurs.

    What I don't understand is why do Karakalpak have more South Asian Iranic components than European while Kazakhs and Kyrgyz have more European components than South Asian Iranic?. This tells me that the original Caucasoid people that used to inhabit Karakalpakstan were of different origin than others.

    Last edited by ButlerKing; 12-27-2012 at 10:20 AM.

  9. #9
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Online
    07-05-2019 @ 08:31 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    British irish
    Ethnicity
    British
    Country
    England
    Gender
    Posts
    11,137
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,314
    Given: 71

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    This must mean even before Turkic or Mongol invasion.

    The people of Central Asia were already a mixed of various Caucasoid people from Europe, West Asia, Middle east.

  10. #10
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Online
    07-05-2019 @ 08:31 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    British irish
    Ethnicity
    British
    Country
    England
    Gender
    Posts
    11,137
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,314
    Given: 71

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Judging from the difference I'll say Karakalpak is inbetween Uyghurs and Kazakhs. If we calculate the Mongoloid and Caucasoid percentage difference than the Karakalpak would still be slightly closer to Uyghurs than the Kazakhs.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Ancient Bulgarians- Turkic or Iranic?
    By Trun in forum History
    Replies: 355
    Last Post: 09-12-2018, 07:39 PM
  2. The Gagauz Turkic people of Moldova
    By StonyArabia in forum Anthropology
    Replies: 80
    Last Post: 11-23-2016, 09:08 AM
  3. Turkic Union chose flag
    By Yalquzaq in forum Türkiye
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-28-2012, 03:22 PM
  4. How close is Mongolian to Turkic languages?
    By rashka in forum Linguistics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-31-2012, 03:09 PM
  5. The Balkars ( Turkic people of Mount Elbarus)
    By StonyArabia in forum Anthropology
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-08-2012, 10:05 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •