Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 49

Thread: Why did the Ustase

  1. #21
    Tschusch-Cefur-Shkja-Vlah Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    mysticism's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Last Online
    01-05-2013 @ 06:30 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Yugoslav
    Ethnicity
    Turbo-Serb
    Ancestry
    Herzegovina-Vasojevici-Kuci
    Country
    Austria
    Region
    Republika Srpska
    Taxonomy
    Pontid-Baltid CM
    Politics
    Sicily is Malta
    Religion
    St.Turko
    Gender
    Posts
    1,784
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 22
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Medvjed View Post
    Most Bosnian Muslims did nothing during WWII. I don't know whether they were just too drunk to notice the crap going on around, or they just didn't like to fight. Not surprised, Bosniaks are kinda indifferent to the things going on around them A 'meh' mentality as it seems
    lol! Noone in the western balkans "did nothing" either you were an enemy, or a friend. There were set factions and if you tried to be neutral you'd be used by one side and therefore be defacto in their faction. If you resisted you're dead or flee to western europe.

    Most Bosnian Muslims were Partizan, and almost equally in Ustasha. A smaller amount were Serbian Chetniks. And an even smaller were the Nazi SS Handzar.

    Most Boslims considered themselves Croats and were used by Pavelic to take out their mutual threat: the Serbs. Boslims identified however the powers wanted them to.

    So it goes

  2. #22
    Veteran Member Methmatician's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Last Online
    01-30-2021 @ 01:59 AM
    Ethnicity
    .
    Country
    Great Britain
    Gender
    Posts
    8,413
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 4,131
    Given: 4,234

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Slavic Blood View Post
    Most Boslims considered themselves Croats and were used by Pavelic to take out their mutual threat: the Serbs. Boslims identified however the powers wanted them to.
    Hence, the 'meh' mentality

  3. #23
    இڿڰۣ-ڰۣ— இڿڰۣ-ڰۣ— இڿڰۣ-ڰۣ—
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Last Online
    08-20-2016 @ 06:08 PM
    Ethnicity
    ...
    Country
    European Union
    Region
    Aboriginal
    Gender
    Posts
    3,956
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 717
    Given: 561

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Zagreb je bio glavni grad koliko ja znam, a za Zagrepčane je bio rekao da su mršavi i da nisu sposobni kao takvi napraviti državu, nisu utemeljitelji države.

  4. #24
    Tschusch-Cefur-Shkja-Vlah Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    mysticism's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Last Online
    01-05-2013 @ 06:30 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Yugoslav
    Ethnicity
    Turbo-Serb
    Ancestry
    Herzegovina-Vasojevici-Kuci
    Country
    Austria
    Region
    Republika Srpska
    Taxonomy
    Pontid-Baltid CM
    Politics
    Sicily is Malta
    Religion
    St.Turko
    Gender
    Posts
    1,784
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 22
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Right. I guess we meant the same thing, just conveyed it differenty.

    However I'd say the Bosnian Muslims' "official" nationalist side was the SS Handzar. A unit for Boslims only. This unit was subordinate to the Ustasha, which had more Boslims, so I suppose that's why I consider the Boslims traditionally Ustasha.

    I find it interesting how the main three sides in the wars had stark differences in perspective of the yugoslav identity:

    Ustasha - All Yugoslavs are Croats, Serbs are Vlachs who speak Croatian
    Chetniks - All Yugoslavs are Serbs, Croats/Bosniaks/Macedonians are converted Serbs
    Partizans - Nationhood and history don't matter, your region is most important.

    This is why I think, so many Montenegrins, Macedonians and Boslims became Partizans I think. Partizanhood bred banana-state regionalism.

    So it goes

  5. #25
    Veteran Member Methmatician's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Last Online
    01-30-2021 @ 01:59 AM
    Ethnicity
    .
    Country
    Great Britain
    Gender
    Posts
    8,413
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 4,131
    Given: 4,234

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Slavic Blood View Post
    Right. I guess we meant the same thing, just conveyed it differenty.

    However I'd say the Bosnian Muslims' "official" nationalist side was the SS Handzar. A unit for Boslims only. This unit was subordinate to the Ustasha, which had more Boslims, so I suppose that's why I consider the Boslims traditionally Ustasha.
    Of course. The Ustaša was an extreme nationalist movement. And since Bosniaks had to only call themselves Croats and they wouldn't be put into the camps, they went along with it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Slavic Blood View Post
    I find it interesting how the main three sides in the wars had stark differences in perspective of the yugoslav identity:

    Ustasha - All Yugoslavs are Croats, Serbs are Vlachs who speak Croatian
    Chetniks - All Yugoslavs are Serbs, Croats/Bosniaks/Macedonians are converted Serbs
    Partizans - Nationhood and history don't matter, your region is most important.
    Actually, The Ustaša still considered Serbs as Croats who were brainwashed by Orthodox Church.

    Quote Originally Posted by Slavic Blood View Post
    This is why I think, so many Montenegrins, Macedonians and Boslims became Partizans I think. Partizanhood bred banana-state regionalism.
    That's another reason why Bosniaks were so pro-Partizan. They didn't have to call themselves by any ethnicity, thus abiding to their ideology. All they had to do was be anti-Fascist.

    Not sure about Montenegrin and Macedonians though. Montenegrins were traditionally non-submissive people. They probably joined the Partisans because they didn't like Italian occupation.

    And I think the Macedonian partisans weren't a part of the Yugoslav Partisans at first, I think they were a separate movement all together for the most of the war.

  6. #26
    Tschusch-Cefur-Shkja-Vlah Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    mysticism's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Last Online
    01-05-2013 @ 06:30 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Yugoslav
    Ethnicity
    Turbo-Serb
    Ancestry
    Herzegovina-Vasojevici-Kuci
    Country
    Austria
    Region
    Republika Srpska
    Taxonomy
    Pontid-Baltid CM
    Politics
    Sicily is Malta
    Religion
    St.Turko
    Gender
    Posts
    1,784
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 22
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Actually, The Ustaša still considered Serbs as Croats who were brainwashed by Orthodox Church.
    Not according to Ante Starcevic and official Ustasha dogma.


    That's another reason why Bosniaks were so pro-Partisan. They didn't have to call themselves by any ethnicity, thus abiding to their ideology. All they had to do was be anti-Fascist.
    There was no "their" ideology in the Partisans. There was only Partisan ideology. Which was, basically: socialism, destruction of class-differences, atheism, no tradition/nationalism, no individuality, Tito is god.

    You could not be a nationalist Bosniak and Partisan at the same time.
    Not sure about Montenegrin and Macedonians though. Montenegrins were traditionally non-submissive people. They probably joined the Partisans because they didn't like Italian occupation.
    Chetniks weren't submissive either. The difference is, Montenegrins are extremely prideful and regionalist (a symptom of defending a small peace of land for 500 years) and so joining an ideology where their insignificant selo and pile of rocks came first before any king or government was more appealing to them.

    And I think the Macedonian partisans weren't a part of the Yugoslav Partisans at first, I think they were a separate movement all together for the most of the war.
    They were very partisan and commie, Apolstolski's faction were no different ideologically than the other partisans, whom they were closely coordinated with.

    So it goes

  7. #27
    Super Moderator Mraz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Bosniak
    Ancestry
    Bosanska Krajina
    Country
    Belgium
    Politics
    Hero
    TITO
    Gender
    Posts
    5,080
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,187
    Given: 1,740

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Medvjed View Post
    Of course. The Ustaša was an extreme nationalist movement. And since Bosniaks had to only call themselves Croats and they wouldn't be put into the camps, they went along with it.



    Actually, The Ustaša still considered Serbs as Croats who were brainwashed by Orthodox Church.



    That's another reason why Bosniaks were so pro-Partizan. They didn't have to call themselves by any ethnicity, thus abiding to their ideology. All they had to do was be anti-Fascist.

    Not sure about Montenegrin and Macedonians though. Montenegrins were traditionally non-submissive people. They probably joined the Partisans because they didn't like Italian occupation.

    And I think the Macedonian partisans weren't a part of the Yugoslav Partisans at first, I think they were a separate movement all together for the most of the war.
    I'm not sure that many Bosniaks joined the Partizans, we were more in Domobranci and Ustasha.
    Cheers to Bosnia


  8. #28
    இڿڰۣ-ڰۣ— இڿڰۣ-ڰۣ— இڿڰۣ-ڰۣ—
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Last Online
    08-20-2016 @ 06:08 PM
    Ethnicity
    ...
    Country
    European Union
    Region
    Aboriginal
    Gender
    Posts
    3,956
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 717
    Given: 561

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    My granfather and his brother, my father and many people who I know were members of Partizan movement

  9. #29
    Veteran Member Methmatician's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Last Online
    01-30-2021 @ 01:59 AM
    Ethnicity
    .
    Country
    Great Britain
    Gender
    Posts
    8,413
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 4,131
    Given: 4,234

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mraz View Post
    I'm not sure that many Bosniaks joined the Partizans, we were more in Domobranci and Ustasha.
    I'm not counting number of Bosniaks in Yugoslav Partisans as compared to other ethnicities. I mean the number of Bosniaks in Partisans to the number of Bosniaks in other armies.

  10. #30
    Super Moderator Mraz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Bosniak
    Ancestry
    Bosanska Krajina
    Country
    Belgium
    Politics
    Hero
    TITO
    Gender
    Posts
    5,080
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,187
    Given: 1,740

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Medvjed View Post
    I'm not counting number of Bosniaks in Yugoslav Partisans as compared to other ethnicities. I mean the number of Bosniaks in Partisans to the number of Bosniaks in other armies.
    Have you stats?
    Cheers to Bosnia


Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •