Recognition as a subspecies

[Útrám]

White nationalists are just a small but loud group of internet nerds in America, where 'white' identity grew in response to 'black' people. Why would you even think about those retards?

I'm surprised you'd write such mean things about WNs. The WN are essential to our movement, perhaps even our greatest asset.

If you browse their forum, you'll learn that each one of them has at least two Ph.D degrees in whatever topic that's currently being discussed. Everyone in their fitness section is a 6 foot 4 olympic power lifter and a street fighting god. All desperately needed resources for the future.

[Jon Snow]

Wonderful thread.

BTW, the recognition of different subspecies don't necessarily mean an ''inferiority-superiority complex'', it's only a matter of fact that, after the split between who left Africa and who remained, Human Race evolved separately and differently in all the colonized lands.

Indeed so. Nature does not produce "superior" or "inferior", at least in a vacuum. Of course, Europeans are superior in European-constructed environments--ditto Asians, Africans, and everyone else in their respective environments--but objectively, each group has the right to survival and self-determination. It is an anti-intellectual leftist smear to conflate supremacist thought with a recognition of the very real, very important biological differences between human population groups.

In the early days of biology the term "race" was commonplace in the context of taxonomy for both men and animals and it was synonymous with 'subspecies'. In today's world scientists of integrity have contended that 'race' is a non-scientific term, however their various substitutes will usually insinuate something that meets the definition of subspecies.

This is one of the many techniques used by scientists who are desirous of the freedom to present their findings without a bunch of hateful left-wing morons screeching "RACIST!" at them. Most scientists know the score, but the problem is that the findings as they are disseminated to laypersons, due to PC linguistic gymnastics, seem to invalidate the existence of race (when in reality they do anything but).

The popular mondialist lie that all humans are the same or equal needs to be exploded, whilst extending universal human rights, and the rights of indigenous peoples to maintain themselves and their native homelands.

The wall of lies pertaining to issues of race needs to come down and people need to maintain their right to express their differences and their separateness. This can come only when the lies are broken.

Agreed. The demonstration of biological racial differences is perhaps the single most powerful argument which can be raised in support of the preservation of human biodiversity (including that of European-derived peoples--shock! horror!).

i doubt White Nationalists have such a plan. They would not mind to pollute the gene pool of native peoples, to rip them off their native lands and kill them off, as Long they Whites stay pure, numerous and ruling the planet.

This is a caricature. Sure, there are some crazies out there who would actively seek to dominate those weaker than or even just different from them. They include probably 1% of European-derived nationalists (who in turn make up a fraction of European-derived peoples globally), as well as about 90% of Muslims. What was your point again?

Ethno-nationalists could be of any ethnicity. Are you for real?

Do you think that politically correct partinost, and Communist lies actually help maintain cultural integrity? What about the forced sterilisation of Gypsies in Communist countries?

The conflict is simply for the truth, against the lies.

This is really what it comes down to. Truth versus lie. Knowledge versus ignorance. Galileo versus the cognitive peasants who hated him for forcing them to think.

[Odelia]

Thank god this thread exists! Because I wanted to make it, and here it is! Saved me time!

Don't forget these cuties:




What, you didn't notice? The first is the Sacred Ibis of Africa, and the second is the Australian Ibis, you blind ignoramus schoolkid! Two different subspecies, so go figure! - Says the pompous four eyed professor.

Biologists are a fucking cowardly jokes! Either they're bored and want to create many subspecies for animals, OR they know deep inside that humans are made up of a few subspecies but they have no balls to lay them out cos "scientific racism!" And when we legitimately question why humans look so physically fucking different they'd be like "hm, your question sounds racist, I won't bother with you"...

[Odelia]

This thread should be upped