0
What do you like better in terms of picking up deep ancestry, Dr. McDonald's BGA or 23AndMe's Ancestry Composition?
Do you think that Ancestry Composition takes into account abt. the last 500 years of your ancestors' (detectable) DNA and the BGA is abt. 1,000 years back and beyond?
In both chromosome paintings it's obvious that the new Ancestry Composition is more detailed but I feel like Dr. McDonald's BGA definitely picks up on ancient ancestry a lot better, do you agree, disagree, etc? I only say this because a lot of the ancestral components I had in the BGA and multiple Gedmatch calculators (Eurogenes, Dodecad, MDLP, etc.) disappeared in my Ancestry Composition (AP2) results.
NOTE: I'm mainly talking about the BGA Chromosome Painting.
Bookmarks