Urumchi: The Ancient Nordic Mummies of China

**Hochmeister** · 01-15-2013, 11:17 PM

Originally Posted by Anglojew

white people inhabited parts of China in ancient times.

Parts of Central Asia (Urumqi is CA too).

BTW, this map explains everything:

Tajiks from Pamir (mountain settlements)

**Anglojew** · 01-15-2013, 11:55 PM

Originally Posted by Hochmeister

Parts of Central Asia (Urumqi is CA too).

BTW, this map explains everything:

Tajiks from Pamir (mountain settlements)

What I find weird is certain people (IM) arguing that those people aren't white when they're descendants of various Indo-European migrations with the same origin as those tribes that migrated to Europe. It's true many have intermarried with non-Whites but some have retained their original ethnicity especially in more isolated regions.

**Hochmeister** · 01-16-2013, 05:05 AM

Originally Posted by Anglojew

arguing that those people aren't white

Do you mean Central Asians at all or just individual European looking persons?
Well, these people have non-white admixes too. Same as the Turks have. Are the Turks white? That is the question.

**RussiaPrussia** · 01-21-2013, 11:08 AM

actually there are also old greek tales from amazon women which really existed, the amazon women were ukrainians and russians who settled in kazakstan and in the same region in china. I saw some docu about it, once.

**Anglojew** · 01-21-2013, 11:14 AM

Originally Posted by Hochmeister

Do you mean Central Asians at all or just individual European looking persons?
Well, these people have non-white admixes too. Same as the Turks have. Are the Turks white? That is the question.

Hey tend to live south of Turkic inhabited lands eg in Persian lands.

**Proto-Shaman** · 02-06-2013, 01:17 PM

Actually these mummies were most likely Turkic Tochars/Tokhars/Tukars/Digors/Dügers, they had nothing to do with the so called speakers of Indo-European "Tocharian A+B".

**Vesuvian Sky** · 02-06-2013, 01:20 PM

Originally Posted by Kipchak_Håkan

Actually these mummies were most likely Turkic Tochars/Tokhars/Tukars/Digors/Dügers, they had nothing to do with the so called speakers of Indo-European "Tocharian A+B".

I am presently bored and would like to hear more of this theory/view point.

Could you expand on this and perhaps provide a source or two?

**Legion** · 02-06-2013, 01:22 PM

The Tarim basin is stolen Aryan land - Occupied by Türkic and Sino-Tibetan forces. Support our cause and bring these oppressors to justice, the voice of Tocharia will be heard! http://www.theapricity.com/forum/group.php?groupid=449

**Vesuvian Sky** · 02-06-2013, 01:24 PM

Originally Posted by Legion

The Tarim basin is stolen Aryan land - Occupied by Türkic and Sino-Tibetan forces. Support our cause and bring these oppressors to justice, the voice of Tocharia will be heard! http://www.theapricity.com/forum/group.php?groupid=449

Joined!

**inactive_member** · 02-06-2013, 01:27 PM

Originally Posted by Kipchak_Håkan

Actually these mummies were most likely Turkic Tochars/Tokhars/Tukars/Digors/Dügers, they had nothing to do with the so called speakers of Indo-European "Tocharian A+B".

If they were Turkic, as many of Turkic were discovered throughout Altai and surrounding regions, westerners would not be interested in the discovery. The mummies are in western press for quite a while now. From what I gathered clothing preserved on mummies resembles that of early Celts. Plus mumies are Caucasoid with red hair which your Turkic ancestors 4,000 years ago were not.