humanphenotypes.net (former www.humanphenotypes.com)

[lei.talk]

The comments are client side,
meaning they aren't part of the page,
meaning they can't be imported into the new wiki.

FANDOM

This wiki has been closed

You can retrieve your content if you like.
(If your wiki was recently closed,
it may take a short period of time for the files to be generated)

Current pages (this version is usually best for bot use)
Current pages and history (warning: this file may be very large)

as you noticed,

each of my carefully constructed comments
modelled a different technique
for presenting referenced physical anthropology information

(including a sub-set of comments
demonstrating how to gently challenge
the portions of text
that lack any referent in reality
or physical anthropology text-books)

and was intentionally designed and crafted
as an illustration to readers
of how they could courteously and successfully participate
in the great conversation.

those exemplars of productive participation
in expanding the knowledge-base
are not preserved in the large file?

You are gonna have to make them again
if you so desire.

my desire to improve your grand project
is nearly as great as my enthusiasm for building wikipedia
over twenty years ago — on the other hand,

calmer counselors have pointed out
that none of my initial simple suggestions
to improve the reliability of posted material on the wiki
have been implemented (despite

the demonstration of our detailed references
for even very obscure sub-sub-races in our index

in addition to the reference-sections
and references added to hundreds of phenotype-pages on the wiki) —

which suggests any corrective efforts on my part
would be a time-consuming unending exercise
of correcting individual sentences

because preventative policies will be considered in the future.

[ImpishTears]

as you noticed,

each of my carefully constructed comments
modelled a different technique
for presenting referenced physical anthropology information

(including a sub-set of comments
demonstrating how to gently challenge
the portions of text
that lack any referent in reality
or physical anthropology text-books)

and was intentionally designed and crafted
as an illustration to readers
of how they could courteously and successfully participate
in the great conversation.

those exemplars of productive participation
in expanding the knowledge-base
are not preserved in the large file?




my desire to improve your grand project
is nearly as great as my enthusiasm for building wikipedia
over twenty years ago — on the other hand,

calmer counselors have pointed out
that none of my initial simple suggestions
to improve the reliability of posted material on the wiki
have been implemented (despite

the demonstration of our detailed references
for even very obscure sub-sub-races in our index

in addition to the reference-sections
and references added to hundreds of phenotype-pages on the wiki) —

which suggests any corrective efforts on my part
would be a time-consuming unending exercise
of correcting individual sentences

because preventative policies will be considered in the future.

Your comments are not preserved in the file, because unlike in Miraheze, comments arent a part of the page in fandom, instead its a specific section, and fandom wont save them sadly. There is nothing to be done about it.

[lei.talk]

Your comments are not preserved in the file...
There is nothing to be done about it.

understandably,
managing your wiki is time-consuming
and leaves little time to address off-site questions.

thank you
for responding to one of mine — twice.

hopefully,
there will be a convenient time for you
to address my associated questions
in the future.

patience has always come easily to me
(no thing ventured — no thing lost).

[ImpishTears]

as you noticed,

each of my carefully constructed comments
modelled a different technique
for presenting referenced physical anthropology information

(including a sub-set of comments
demonstrating how to gently challenge
the portions of text
that lack any referent in reality
or physical anthropology text-books)

and was intentionally designed and crafted
as an illustration to readers
of how they could courteously and successfully participate
in the great conversation.

those exemplars of productive participation
in expanding the knowledge-base
are not preserved in the large file?




my desire to improve your grand project
is nearly as great as my enthusiasm for building wikipedia
over twenty years ago — on the other hand,

calmer counselors have pointed out
that none of my initial simple suggestions
to improve the reliability of posted material on the wiki
have been implemented (despite

the demonstration of our detailed references
for even very obscure sub-sub-races in our index

in addition to the reference-sections
and references added to hundreds of phenotype-pages on the wiki) —

which suggests any corrective efforts on my part
would be a time-consuming unending exercise
of correcting individual sentences

because preventative policies will be considered in the future.

I know perfectly what you mean, and i blame my forgetfulness for forgetting to cite the literature.

[arco]

is it accurate most of the time?

[ImpishTears]

is it accurate most of the time?

It has errors, but i'd say its mostly accurate.

[lei.talk]

is it accurate most of the time?

every physical anthropology taxa is documented by scientists.

we have not deposited every text in to the internet archive,
but — there is sufficient material available
to reference most additions/deletions.

imagine the burden of moderating changes
unaccompanied by any evidence

because there is no policy requiring evidence.

how can any one judge
which words are accurate or which are not
or the general level of accuracy for the whole content

if references are lacking

I know perfectly what you mean...

my words are not difficult to understand.

a few days past, as we observed the children
enjoying a wall-poster of jan czekanowski's world-race diagram
by sticking taxonomic labels and photographs (norma facialis & lateralis)
in the appropriate locations —

one of the parents too casually commented
"Esbjörn just tagged the Savid. Notice how carefully he distanced it from Caeli's Norid."
her husband expanded in to her comment:
"Remember why we suggested you visit that phenotype wikia?"

"To alleviate their reliance on 'bro-science' in human taxonomy?"

"It was their discussion of deleting the Savid page because their Norid morph was indistinguishable from the Savid morph which meant those two taxa must be synonymous."

"I remember."

"We provided maps to emphasize the geographical difference implied by the names. There were hot-links to all of the physical anthropologists documenting the two subraces and the adjacent varieties. The relevant books and articles were itemized in detail."

"I remember."

she shook her head as she questioned "How could they not know Lebzelter's Norische Rasse...
...was first documented in Lammasch's Norische Republik?" her husband concluded.

"What do they teach children in school, now-a-days?"
now, shaking my head (sympathetically).

"That was the most documented page on that wikia."

"I remember."

"It has been deleted."

my words are not difficult to understand.
why would we spend many more months contributing
to see research disappear

[ImpishTears]

every physical anthropology taxa is documented by scientists.

we have not deposited every text in to the internet archive,
but — there is sufficient material available
to reference most additions/deletions.

imagine the burden of moderating changes
unaccompanied by any evidence

because there is no policy requiring evidence.

how can any one judge
which words are accurate or which are not
or the general level of accuracy for the whole content

if references are lacking


my words are not difficult to understand.

a few days past, as we observed the children
enjoying a wall-poster of jan czekanowski's world-race diagram
by sticking taxonomic labels and photographs (norma facialis & lateralis)
in the appropriate locations —

one of the parents too casually commented
"Esbjörn just tagged the Savid. Notice how carefully he distanced it from Caeli's Norid."
her husband expanded in to her comment:
"Remember why we suggested you visit that phenotype wikia?"

"To alleviate their reliance on 'bro-science' in human taxonomy?"

"It was their discussion of deleting the Savid page because their Norid morph was indistinguishable from the Savid morph which meant those two taxa must be synonymous."

"I remember."

"We provided maps to emphasize the geographical difference implied by the names. There were hot-links to all of the physical anthropologists documenting the two subraces and the adjacent varieties. The relevant books and articles were itemized in detail."

"I remember."

she shook her head as she questioned "How could they not know Lebzelter's Norische Rasse...
...was first documented in Lammasch's Norische Republik?" her husband concluded.

"What do they teach children in school, now-a-days?"
now, shaking my head (sympathetically).

"That was the most documented page on that wikia."

"I remember."

"It has been deleted."

my words are not difficult to understand.
why would we spend many more months contributing
to see research disappear

Check the new rules. A new clause has been added demanding citations for phenotypes and information.

[lei.talk]

[ImpishTears]

Miraheze has also decided to shut down the site. That banner is misleading, as the wiki has been constantly updated. Eoraptor and others have filed appeals, but they have been ignored.