Bosnia: Muslim spiritual leader urges more Sharia law

**Poltergeist** · 08-20-2009, 01:05 PM

Originally Posted by reality check

Hungarian chauvinists aren't better than Serbian chauvinists. They're worse.

Lajos Kossuth, your presence in this forum is nothing but chauvinist nationalitism (no typo here). I smelled your prejudice against many from the start.

You are becoming far beyond disturbing and impertinent.

**Nationalitist** · 08-20-2009, 01:08 PM

Why is that? Are you unhappy with Slovenian nationalism because in the past we have defeated Hungarian chauvinism? In 1919 and in 1945 you had to retreat. I hope that one day you will retreat from Porabje too, the region which is still occupied by Hungary.

You are just like any other Hungarian chauvinist... When you gained confidence and territoriarility here, you became aggressive, and irreverently chauvinist, revealing your ill-bred attitude.

**Poltergeist** · 08-20-2009, 01:11 PM

Originally Posted by reality check

Why is that? Are you unhappy with Slovenian nationalism because in the past we have defeated Hungarian chauvinism? In 1919 and in 1945 you had to retreat. I hope that one day you will retreat from Porabje too, the region which is still occupied by Hungary.

Muravidék (what Slovenians in their funny Slavic idiom call "Prekmurje") is Hungarian!

Porabje, lol, such a region doesn't even exist. It is a Slovenian invention.

**Poltergeist** · 08-20-2009, 01:32 PM

When I think of it better, bombing Serbia in 1999 was the only good thing NATO did in the last twenty years (since the demise of the Eastern block).

**The Lawspeaker** · 08-20-2009, 01:33 PM

Originally Posted by Lajos Kossuth

When I think of it better, bombing Serbia in 1999 was the only good thing NATO did in the last twenty years (since the demise of the Eastern block).

No- it was the worst mistake they ever made. They should have bombed the Albanians back to the year dot. And I feel the need to apologize towards the Serbs on this board for the role my country played in this drama.

**Poltergeist** · 08-20-2009, 01:37 PM

Originally Posted by Lawspeaker

No- it was the worst mistake they ever made. They should have bombed the Albanians back to the year dot. And I feel the need to apologize towards the Serbs on this board for the role my country played in this drama.

That's your opinion, a flawed and mistaken one, as I think. NATO strategists knew better.

The rationale behind the bombing must have been the following: skulls that are too thick and impervious to reasoning and arguments, have to be smashed with a hammer.

Besides, even had NATO considered Albanians as enemies, there was no need to bomb them, because Serbs were already bombing them.

**The Lawspeaker** · 08-20-2009, 01:42 PM

Originally Posted by Lajos Kossuth

That's your opinion, a flawed and mistaken one, as I think. NATO strategists knew better.

The rationale behind the bombing must have been the following: skulls that are too thick and impervious to reasoning and arguments, have to be smashed with a hammer.

Besides, even had NATO considered Albanians as enemies, there was no need to bomb them, because Serbs were already bombing them.

How in the hell can you defend Muslims when your own Europeans were / no.. are being attacked ?
You do realize that the Albanians were only recent there. Not much more then a couple of hundreds of years and were slowly nicking Serbian soil. EUROPEAN SOIL. During World War II a dedicated SS-division "Skanderberg" killed off an enormous amount of Serbs which were replaced with Albanians.

So what you are seeing here.. is in effect Northern Ireland. Only then you can replace "Irish" with "Serbs" and "British colonists during the Middle Ages and under William III" with "Albanians" and you are set. But then again.. Hungary was on what side of the war ?

Ooh yes.. now I remember. Must have been a joy working together with Hitler !

**Poltergeist** · 08-20-2009, 01:51 PM

Originally Posted by Lawspeaker

How in the hell can you defend Muslims when your own Europeans were / no.. are being attacked ?

Why should I sympathise Serbs, a people that pathologically hates Hungarians and anything Hungarian (second only to Slovaks), who killed many Hungarians (some say 40000) in "Vojvodina" at the end of the second world war?

Originally Posted by Lawspeaker

You do realize that the Albanians were only recent there. Not much more then a couple of hundreds of years and were slowly nicking Serbian soil. EUROPEAN SOIL. During World War II a dedicated SS-division "Skanderberg" killed off an enormous amount of Serbs which were replaced with Albanians.

Many territories were taken from Hungary, yet nobody cares. Why should I care about a Hungarian-hating nation and their territories?

Originally Posted by Lawspeaker

So what you are seeing here.. is in effect Northern Ireland. Only then you can replace "Irish" with "Serbs" and "British colonists during the Middle Ages and under William III" with "Albanians" and you are set.

It's the matter of quite arbitrary interpretation. Every situation is unique. I'd concede and say there are two equally valid claims to Kosovo/Kosova. Currently the Albanians gained the upper hand, thanks to the combination of their own efforts and NATO assistance.

Originally Posted by Lawspeaker

Loki/Fjällräv. I hate to say it but can you toss this troll and traitor out ?

Is this some kind of political movement, that it has traitors which need to be "tossed", or a board for discussions?

**Nationalitist** · 08-20-2009, 02:25 PM

Originally Posted by Lajos Kossuth

When I think of it better, bombing Serbia in 1999 was the only good thing NATO did in the last twenty years (since the demise of the Eastern block).

... And the only good thing Habsburgs did was that they defeated Lajos Kossuth.

Their rationale: skulls that are too thick and impervious to reasoning and arguments, have to be smashed with a hammer.