View Poll Results: Should Bulgaria have been part of Yugoslavia?

Voters
70. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    29 41.43%
  • No

    41 58.57%
Page 11 of 19 FirstFirst ... 789101112131415 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 182

Thread: Should Bulgaria have been part of Yugoslavia?

  1. #101
    Veteran Member Tschaikisten's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Last Online
    09-10-2022 @ 09:49 PM
    Ethnicity
    Србин
    Ancestry
    Dinarische Alpen, Pannonien
    Country
    Serbia
    Region
    Herzegovina
    Y-DNA
    G-L497
    Gender
    Posts
    1,238
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,469
    Given: 941

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lemon Kush View Post
    Bulgarians are close linguistically with the other Yugoslav (especially the Serbs)
    Maybe to southern Serbs. Dinaric Serbs are closser to Bosnians and Croats than to Bulgarians (I don't like them, but that's the fact).
    Using 2 populations approximation:
    1 50% Croatian +50% Serbian @ 2.265001

    Quote Originally Posted by The Destroyer
    how come the age of I2a2 Din subclade exactly coincides with the age of Bosnian Pyramids?

  2. #102
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Last Online
    11-25-2017 @ 03:28 AM
    Location
    Serbia
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Slavic-Sarmatian-Illyrian
    Ethnicity
    Serb
    Ancestry
    Dalmatia
    Country
    Serbia
    Y-DNA
    I2-CTS10228
    Taxonomy
    North Pontid + minor Dinarid
    Politics
    Serbian Nationalism
    Hero
    Car Dušan
    Religion
    Serbian Orthodox
    Gender
    Posts
    2,302
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 968
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    @ Siyendi

    Turkic people are semi-Mongoloid primitive barbarian nomads without any culture, deal with it.

  3. #103
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Last Online
    12-08-2018 @ 06:13 PM
    Ethnicity
    Turkish
    Ancestry
    Oğuz / Turcoman
    Country
    Turkey
    Gender
    Posts
    10,237
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,722
    Given: 1,300

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    If it's wrong prove us the high civilization the Slavs had. Slavlantis?

    The Early Medieval Balkans: A Critical Survey from the Sixth to the Late ...
    By John V. A. Fine, John Van Antwerp Fine, pages 119 and 300





    That's the same for east Slavs.
    East Slavs were ruled by a Viking class which itself followed the example (state organization, symbols, titles) of Khazars.

    Hybrid Rule and State Formation: Public-Private Power in the 21st Century
    by Shelley Hurt, Ronnie Lipschutz






    The strengthening of Slavs has just 150 years of history.
    Russia (Muscovy) itself was built on Khazarian example, later also following the path of the Golden Horde.
    In 1917, a group of Jews, Georgians, Lithuanians made a revolution in Russia and decided that Slavic country will become a world power.
    And later English and world Jewish organizations helped Soviets become world power.

    So history is self-repeating.
    1000 years ago Ruriks and Khazar.
    100 years ago Lenins and Stalins.

  4. #104
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Last Online
    11-25-2017 @ 03:28 AM
    Location
    Serbia
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Slavic-Sarmatian-Illyrian
    Ethnicity
    Serb
    Ancestry
    Dalmatia
    Country
    Serbia
    Y-DNA
    I2-CTS10228
    Taxonomy
    North Pontid + minor Dinarid
    Politics
    Serbian Nationalism
    Hero
    Car Dušan
    Religion
    Serbian Orthodox
    Gender
    Posts
    2,302
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 968
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Siyendi View Post
    1000 years ago Ruriks and Khazar.
    100 years ago Lenins and Stalins.
    The ruling elite of your people Anatolians:

    - 900 years ago semi-Mongoloid Oghuz Turks.

    - 500 years ago south Slavic Janissaries (mostly Serbian).

    - 300 years ago and today Jewish-Zionist elite organized in secret society Dönmeh.

    Live with this.

  5. #105
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Last Online
    12-08-2018 @ 06:13 PM
    Ethnicity
    Turkish
    Ancestry
    Oğuz / Turcoman
    Country
    Turkey
    Gender
    Posts
    10,237
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,722
    Given: 1,300

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Like it or not, you will deal with it, subhuman.
    Slavs were chosen by the English MI6 and the world Jewish organizations (under heavy anti-Semitic pressure back then) as the starting point of Communism.
    Communism was a tool to destroy the old established civilization rule.

    Why they chose Slavs and not Germans? Because Germans by nature aren't fit for low class proletarian propaganda. They have a nobility system and old civilization.
    The Slavs, being historically uncivilized and lacking any nobility system were fit for it.
    Germans had a lot to lose, Slavs had nothing to lose.

    Even the soviet union started with a heavy anti-Slavic propaganda and terror. Slavs were treated as mass to give shape to, like cattle masses.
    And it was ruled by a Jewish, Georgian and Lithuanian elite.

  6. #106
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Last Online
    11-25-2017 @ 03:28 AM
    Location
    Serbia
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Slavic-Sarmatian-Illyrian
    Ethnicity
    Serb
    Ancestry
    Dalmatia
    Country
    Serbia
    Y-DNA
    I2-CTS10228
    Taxonomy
    North Pontid + minor Dinarid
    Politics
    Serbian Nationalism
    Hero
    Car Dušan
    Religion
    Serbian Orthodox
    Gender
    Posts
    2,302
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 968
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Siyendi View Post
    Like it or not, you will deal with it, subhuman.
    Slavs were chosen by the English MI6 and the world Jewish organizations (under heavy anti-Semitic pressure back then) as the starting point of Communism.
    Communism was a tool to destroy the old established civilization rule.

    Why they chose Slavs and not Germans? Because Germans by nature aren't fit for low class proletarian propaganda. They have a nobility system and old civilization.
    The Slavs, being historically uncivilized and lacking any nobility system were fit for it.
    Germans had a lot to lose, Slavs had nothing to lose.

    Even the soviet union started with a heavy anti-Slavic propaganda and terror. Slavs were treated as mass to give shape to, like cattle masses.
    And it was ruled by a Jewish, Georgian and Lithuanian elite.
    Hello Anatolian-Levantine monkey manipulator!

    Hitler and 90% of the leading Nazis were Ashkenazi Jews, Hitler belong to haplogroup E1b which is very common among Jews.

    Ataturk was Jew.

    Erdogan is Georgian-Jewish mix.

    Abdulah Gul is Sephardic Jew.

    Ahmet Davutoglu (Davut=David) is Karaite Jew.

    Deal with this.

  7. #107
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Croatia
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Slavic+Romance
    Ethnicity
    Croatian
    Ancestry
    3/4 Croatian and 1/4 North Italian
    Country
    Croatia
    Region
    Dalmatia
    Y-DNA
    I2a1b
    Taxonomy
    Atlantid+CM
    Politics
    Direct Democracy
    Hero
    Jordan Peterson
    Religion
    Deist
    Gender
    Posts
    9,888
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 12,781
    Given: 8,063

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Siyendi View Post
    Slavs were chosen by the English MI6 and the world Jewish organizations (under heavy anti-Semitic pressure back then) as the starting point of Communism.
    Communism was a tool to destroy the old established civilization rule.
    Im no fan of Pan-Slavism but that is just ScFi, Jews were unable to kill a fly at the beginning of 20th century let alone dictate global movement like Communism. I mean wtf man, this is like theory of conspiracy that man "didnt landed on Moon" or that Aliens built Pyramids.

    Communism spreaded troughout Slavs because of 1000 reasons which has nothin to do with Slavs as slavs but because of historical circumstances. You ppl see Jews in your living rooms, no offence.

    Quote Originally Posted by Siyendi View Post
    Why they chose Slavs and not Germans? Because Germans by nature aren't fit for low class proletarian propaganda. They have a nobility system and old civilization.
    The Slavs, being historically uncivilized and lacking any nobility system were fit for it.
    Germans had a lot to lose, Slavs had nothing to lose.
    Let me tell you something about Germanics which I would say any time, any place, anywhere, in public, wherever you want, and I noticed this troughout History.

    Germanics ppl are ppl without any kind of center in their way of mindset and thinking, first they were the biggest monsters out of all white ppl, they were killing tens of millions of non-whites troughout world, they fucking exterminated entire "sub-race" of native americans in North America, they brought Aborigines to point of extinction in Australia, they enslaved black ppl in Africa like ANIMALS, then came Hitler who killed millions of Jews in Europe.

    After that Germanic extreme sickness, came another OPPOSITE germanic sickness in their mindset/way of thinking which lasts till this day; LIBERALISM/LEFTISM.

    Out of the blu germanics of today (and in last 50 years) are like sheeps waitin to be slaughtered by any non-white group which comes to their countries, and what's worse they're trying to spread that sickness of theirs on Romance and Slavic ppl, just like they tried with their ultra-racist maniac sickness before Liberal sickness.

    They have no CENTER, NO CENTER IN THEIR MINDSET, NO BALANCE in their ideology, they are either RACIST MONSTERS or they are FUCKING GAY-PUSSIES-LIBERALS of today, that is who Germanics are.

    Today all of us White ppl carry the burden OF GERMANIC SICKNESS; either their ultra-racist sickness of the past, or their Liberal-Pussy-Gay sickness of today. That is the REAL TRUTH, nevermind who agrees or not, and how things are going they will fucking destroy themselves, because they never ever had any kind of center or balance in their way of thinking/mindset, of entire society of theirs and ideology.

    Quote Originally Posted by Siyendi View Post
    Even the soviet union started with a heavy anti-Slavic propaganda and terror. Slavs were treated as mass to give shape to, like cattle masses.
    And it was ruled by a Jewish, Georgian and Lithuanian elite.
    What a bullshit, haha, is that why Slavic countries of today are 100% white and all Germanic countries are like MECCA AND MEDINA of today? You are contradicting yourself.

    I was talking in person with many Israelis and they have 100 times more respect for Slavic mindset of fight for what is slavic then for PUSSY-GAYS GERMANICS and how they treat their own society of today, they are killed like cattles by islamic terrorism (MUSLIMS FROM THEIR OWN COUNTRIES which they are letting in), they're fucking nemesis for entire Europe, both of their sick extremes (Ultra-racism of past and liberal sickness of today), AND NEVER AGAIN will white ppl of Europe be led by GERMANICS, never.

    They had their chance and THEY ALMOST FUCKING KILLED ALL WHITE PPL WITH THEIR IDEOLOGICAL RETARDATION including their own ppl.

    No more.

    P.S. I repeat, I am no fan of Pan-Slavism, neither do I consider myself Slavic in fact, but Slavs PROTECT THEIR OWN, germanics are fucking lunatics today, and THANK GOD our countries are not like theirs, THANK GOD.
    Last edited by Robocop; 09-29-2017 at 10:08 AM.

  8. #108
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Last Online
    11-25-2017 @ 03:28 AM
    Location
    Serbia
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Slavic-Sarmatian-Illyrian
    Ethnicity
    Serb
    Ancestry
    Dalmatia
    Country
    Serbia
    Y-DNA
    I2-CTS10228
    Taxonomy
    North Pontid + minor Dinarid
    Politics
    Serbian Nationalism
    Hero
    Car Dušan
    Religion
    Serbian Orthodox
    Gender
    Posts
    2,302
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 968
    Given: 0

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robocop View Post
    What a bullshit, haha, is that why Slavic countries of today are 100% white and all Germanic countries are like MECCA AND MEDINA of today? You are contradicting yourself.

    I was talking in person with many Israelis and they have 100 times more respect for Slavic mindset of fight for what is slavic then for PUSSY-GAYS-GERMANICS and how they treat their own society of today, they are killed like cattles by islamic terrorism (MUSLIMS FROM THEIR OWN COUNTRIES which they are letting in), they're fucking nemesis for entire Europe, both of their sick extremes (Ultra-racism of past and liberal sickness of today), AND NEVER AGAIN will white ppl of Europe be led by GERMANICS, never.
    Very true.

  9. #109
    Senior Member Drenica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Last Online
    09-30-2017 @ 05:31 AM
    Ethnicity
    .
    Country
    Netherlands
    Gender
    Posts
    389
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 273
    Given: 190

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ChocolateFace View Post
    Pretty much this



  10. #110
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Last Online
    12-08-2018 @ 06:13 PM
    Ethnicity
    Turkish
    Ancestry
    Oğuz / Turcoman
    Country
    Turkey
    Gender
    Posts
    10,237
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,722
    Given: 1,300

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    İ don't hate Slavs btw I have respect for normal Slavs. I like Poles for example.
    They are kind people.
    However, in their relation with other people, most Slavs are expecting to be treated as semi-gods and even proceed with strong historical bias to give that perception. That's the issue.

    I heard that for example in Bulgaria, the school books from Communist era tell how Bulgars were inferior barbarian people and just a handful, which were civilized by the superior Slavic culture and the Slavic mass. That's pure bs when you analyze the historical events. If one civilized the other and taught the other how to be people with dignity and organization, it was the other way around.

Page 11 of 19 FirstFirst ... 789101112131415 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Should the Western Outlands become part of Bulgaria again?
    By Archduke in forum България
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 10-13-2012, 02:11 PM
  2. Should there be another Yugoslavia?
    By Ghost Knight in forum Politics & Ideology
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 07-08-2012, 10:54 PM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-19-2012, 12:43 PM
  4. The U.S. War on Yugoslavia (1999)
    By The Lawspeaker in forum History
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-26-2010, 06:57 PM
  5. Yugoslavia figures
    By poiuytrewq0987 in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-03-2010, 11:38 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •