Which Western Nation Will Win the Race to the Bottom?

[Æmeric]

Which nation will absolutely self-destruct first because of pro-diversity policies & thirdworld immigration? Make your picks & give your reasons.

Here are mine:

1. The US: Not only are Euro-Americans down to about 65%, from about 85% in the year of my birth (1962) but we just elected this multiracial messiah as our president.

His father is Kenyan! How obscene is that?

The population problem is the result of subsidizing the procreation of our native Negro minority & allowing mass immigration of Latinos, Negroes & Asians.


2. Canada: Canada was virtually all European, excluding the Aboriginal population (1% or 2% at the time), in 1968. Now it is 1/6 "visible minority", mostly East Asian, South Asian, Middle Eastern & Afro-Caribbean. 40-years ago Canada became an official "Multicutural Society" which really meant multiracial. The current representative of the Queen in Canada, the Governor-General, is a Haitian immigrant:

Michaëlle Jean, Governor General of Canada.

Her predecessor was a Chinese woman.


3. Sweden: The population is down to 80% Swedish. (Is that correct?) In a couple of decades it will cease to be an ethno-state - I'm sure the politic elite in that country haven't considered Sweden to be ethno-state for decades. And they have an Integration Ministry! Even the US doesn't have one of those, normally those duties fall to the US Justice Department. And the Integration Minister is an immigrant from Burundi.

Nyamko Sabuni

The job of destroying the ethnic Swedish society (that is what integration will accomplish) is given to this woman! How insane is that? It is as though the Swedish elite have a suicide wish. Sweden was virtually all-White (maybe a few Gypsies & Lapps) & virtually all-Swedish at the middle of the 20th century, non-Swedes being mostly natives of surrounding countries. There were no non-White colonies, which was responsible for much of the non-Europid inflow into Britain, France & the Netherlands. Sweden is far removed from the sources of it's thirdworld immigration, unlike the US which borders Mexico & is reachable by sea from poor Caribbean states. This is the last place in the West were this should happen, other then Australia & New Zealand.

4. Australia: Australia had a defacto "White Australia" policy until 1973. Even before this was abandon, Australia had been recruiting immigrants from European nations other then Britain & Ireland, which was mistake as Greeks, Italians, Poles & Yugoslavs didn't assimilate as well to the Anglo-Celyic society that already existed in Australia & thus do not hold Australia's British heritage in the same regard as Anglo-Celtic Australians. Since 1973, Asians went from nearly non-existant in Australia to 7%. And this number does not include "Caucasian" Middle Easterners such as Turks & Lebanese. One of the rationals for opening Australia to non-British & non-Europid immigration was that if it didn't become more populated then they might be invaded by yellow hordes from the north. So apparently the geniuses who run the country decided to Asianize Australia for it's own good.

5. New Zealand: 40-years ago, New Zealand was approximately 92% White, mainly of British Isles descent. Most of the non-Europids were Maori, Asians being 1% or less. Thanks to welfare policies, Maoris are now nearly 15% (about 1/2 are also part European), Europeans are down to almost 70% with Asians & other Pacific Islanders making up the rest. As an island nation remote from the rest of the world New Zealand should have no trouble controlling its ports if it chose to do so.

This is the New Zealand Governor-General:

Anand Satyanand, an Indo-Fijian

I didn't mention South Africa, as it started out with a large non-Europid population, Europeans never more then 21% during the 20th century & the problems facing the nations I listed could have been avoided with farsighted demographic policies.

[Arrow Cross]

A pretty realistic list, but although the percentages might be the least favourable in the US now, let us not forget that European immigration is more recent, more rapid, and more rabid at the moment, not to mention that there are countless other factors in play here, so who's going down first is still a quite open question.

[Loyalist]

Good list, and I can certainly corroborate the racial decline in Canada. One can walk down any given street in Toronto and not see a single European, or hear a word of English.

I believe we should add France to the list. The country has long had a perverted view of what constitutes the French ethnicity and nationality, and this corruption reflects in the nation's demographics today. There are presently 4.9 million foreign-born immigrants in France, with millions more of second or third generation immigrant stock. That includes Arabs and Negroes from the colonies, and sizeable populations of Orientals. The situation is actually so bad that it's effectively impossible to measure the number of non-ethnic French presently inhabiting the nation, but 8% of the population was born elsewhere.

Here's the "French" national football team.

[Atlas]

I agree with loyalist, France should be on the list, and alongside the US way before Canada or Australia.

Also, France is in much greater trouble with it's muslim population, when Americans aren't all that bothered by latinos gangs who kill each others.

It's all between France and America. Which will save the other from the mud invasion ?

[SwordoftheVistula]

I'd have to lead off the list with the two countries which are currently experiencing out-migration due to 'quality of life issues' related to nonwhite immigrants: basically, 'white flight' from the entire nations:

1. The Netherlands. Small population means that nonwhites are more quickly becoming a large portion of the country, and the country is generally a liberal society which bends over backwards to accommodate muslims.

2. England/Britain. As above, but has a bit larger population, slightly more speech protections for speaking out against the problem, and is not quite as liberal as continental Europe, although they still bend over backwards to accommodate muslims. On the minus side, those from former colonies such as Pakistan have an easier time immigrating to the country.

3. Sweden. As above, and recently instituted the most open immigration policy in Europe. Only ranks this below the other two because I have yet to see any stories about people moving out of Sweden due to 'quality of life issues' related to nonwhite immigrants. Has the same similar birthrate as the above two countries, above the European average but well below replacement levels.

4. France. Seems to have one of the largest and most out-of-control nonwhite populations in Europe. Their only saving grace is one of the higher birthrates in western countries, but this may be due to the large nonwhite population. As stated above, the nonwhite portion of the population is hard to estimate, since many are 2nd or 3rd generation, and many sub-Saharan Africans are not muslims.

5. Belgium. Seems to have a large nonwhite population, compared to the small population of the country as a total.

6. Germany. Low birth rate plus large Turkish immigration

7. Canada. Has a high rate of immigration, but many of them are Asian, which don't cause that many problems comparatively.

Wild Cards:

United States: Very high population of nonwhites, but also one of the highest white birthrates. Problems with nonwhites are reduced to some extent by decentralization, a smaller welfare state, and widespread private gun ownership. Few of the immigrants are muslims, and there is a cultural acceptance of police violence similar to that of former Soviet Bloc countries, which prevents the type of chronic riots seen in France or Sweden. These roadblocks could deteriorate rapidly though, as nonwhites gain more political power due to their growing population size

Greece: The country has one of the lowest birthrates in the world, and as recent (still ongoing) riots have shown, the government/police lack the ability or will to control the country. However, they seem to have a strong civic/religious nationalist inclinations.

Australia/New Zealand: Protected by geographic isolation, but small overall populations mean they could be more rapidly overrun by immigrants. Still, probably better off than Europe, especially as New Zealand has a high birthrate.

Least in danger:

Countries in Eastern Europe: their economies still suck due to decades of communist policies, and thus nobody wants to move there.

[Eldritch]

I don't know how bad things are overseas, but in Europe, the shit will the fan first in France, England, Belgium and Sweden. Not that most other European countries are very far behind.

However I have a strong enough catastrophist streak to think that that isn't all bad. If total chaos and destruction is what it takes to get people to wake up to reality, then total chaos and destruction is what we must have.

[GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS]

I don't know if any of you all have been to Sweden, but there can go weeks without me seeing a single immigrant. I don't live in a large city where this would be impossible, but still -- I'm not as glum as you are.

My candidate? France.



A close second would be the UK, or possibly Germany.

[Loki]

I don't know if any of you all have been to Sweden, but there can go weeks without me seeing a single immigrant. I don't live in a large city where this would be impossible, but still -- I'm not as glum as you are.

The majority of Sweden's immigrants are within the broader Caucasoid range, hence they are less visible to the eye. Loads from former Yugoslavia, the Middle East, including Iraq and Iran.

[SouthernBoy]

The population problem is the result of subsidizing the procreation of our native Negro minority & allowing mass immigration of Latinos, Negroes & Asians.

And?

[Æmeric]

You don't consider this a problem? You don't mind living in a cesspool of Negroes & Mexicans, caused on the one hand by a welfare system that did not penalize Negro women for having children they could not support on their own, let along expect the fathers to contribute. And on the other hand by a lax immigration policy that has seen the number of Latinos in the US go from 14 million to nearly 50-million in less then 30-years.