View Poll Results: Should the deliberately childless have their pensions cut?

Voters
10. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, in fact pensions should be axed for the childless

    1 10.00%
  • Yes, pensions should be reduced for the childless

    1 10.00%
  • It depends (elaborate)

    1 10.00%
  • No

    7 70.00%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Should The Childless' Pensions Be Cut?

  1. #1
    `│´ 1312019132512912292038191221 Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Vulpix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    in my head, in ur brains
    Meta-Ethnicity
    North Germanic
    Ethnicity
    northern barbarian
    Country
    Sweden
    Taxonomy
    frosty & bloodthirsty
    Politics
    savaging and pillaging
    Religion
    catheist & evil cat propagandist
    Gender
    Posts
    5,871
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 101
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default Should The Childless' Pensions Be Cut?

    Should the deliberately childless have their pensions cut? Or do you think they should be axed completely?



    Germany Considers Pension Cuts for the Childless


    15.03.2006

    Politicians Discuss Pension Cuts for Childless Germans:
    New statistics confirming the declining birth rate have sent Germany in to a state of panic, amid a growing consensus that pensions should be increased for people with children and reduced for those without.
    “People without children should either receive a reduced pension or pay more into pension schemes,” said Norbert Geis from the CSU.
    Johann Eekhoff, director of the Cologne institute for Economic Policy said a reform of the pension system was long overdue.
    People without children should never have been admitted into pension schemes because these only work when they are financed by subsequent generations,” he said in an interview with mass-circulation Bild newspaper. “Their pensions should be cut by 50 percent.”
    As Mark Steyn likes to say, any country that promotes a central welfare state is going to have to have pro-natalist policies, or the welfare state won’t survive more than a couple generations. The catch is that the welfare state seems strongly correlated with lower birth rates, potentially creating an unsustainable system. What’s a socialist to do?
    To quote another Steynism, “The design flaw of the secular social-democratic state is that it requires a religious-society birth rate to sustain it. Post-Christian hyper-rationalism is, in the objective sense, a lot less rational than Catholicism or Mormonism.”


  2. #2
    Member Oisín's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last Online
    08-12-2009 @ 12:33 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Celt
    Ethnicity
    Irish
    Ancestry
    Luimneach, Chiarraí
    Country
    Ireland
    Taxonomy
    Gael
    Politics
    Nationalist, anti-Capitalist
    Age
    21
    Gender
    Posts
    238
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 9
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    I definitely think there should be incentives for couples to have large families but I don't think those without children should have their pensions cut. Some people are not physically capable of having children and some people are just unlucky in love and never get the chance to have a family, I don't think they should be punished for that.
    Reward those that do have large families but don't punish those who don't/can't.
    Glaine ár gcroí - Neart ár ngéag - Beart de réir ár mbriathar


  3. #3
    Axis Hatemonger Arrow Cross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last Online
    01-23-2021 @ 04:53 PM
    Location
    Budapest
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Turanic
    Ethnicity
    Magyar
    Ancestry
    Carpathian Basin
    Country
    Hungary
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Reformed Protestant
    Gender
    Posts
    1,850
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 107
    Given: 78

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    No, dammit, create a state where one could responsibly think about having a family, and if you ruin the economy and bring in half-ape savages en masse, don't be surprised if people will be less inclined.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last Online
    05-23-2009 @ 05:50 AM
    Location
    PNW
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Colonial Germanic
    Ancestry
    Continental Europe and the British Isles. [Norway, Scotland and the former Hapsburg Empire]
    Politics
    Paleo-Liberalism
    Religion
    Protestant [Agnostic]
    Age
    20
    Gender
    Posts
    408
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Uhh err... How about we axe the immigrants?



    There should never be a problem for pension funds. The Government uses the pension fund to invest in businesses, foreign countries and to purchase and build armaments.
    If there is ever a pension crisis, than it's the result of an economic collapse or poor investment decisions by officials in charge of the fund.
    Last edited by TheGreatest; 12-27-2008 at 02:01 PM.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last Online
    09-17-2009 @ 10:18 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Ancestry
    Britain (Some by way of Ulster) & Germany
    Country
    United States
    Taxonomy
    Osteuropid-NorthAlpinid
    Politics
    Ultra-Conservative/anti-Obama
    Age
    47
    Gender
    Posts
    2,154
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 33
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Think of it this way: Should the childless have to pay taxes that go towards supporting statefunded schools? Is it fair that people with children get extra benefits in the form of tax credits/deductions or outright payments, which means the childless must make up the difference in higher taxes?

    Some societies get along without state pension systems, Japan for one & China has decided not to burden itself with one. The welfare state is very expensive & is inept in adminstration. The tax burden of supporting the modern welfare state has as much to do with depressed TFRs as the promise of the state supported pensions in old age. The Western welfare state is nothing more then a ponzi scheme that will come crashing down eventually. The reason the EU needs 50 million immgrants is to support its pension system.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last Online
    05-23-2009 @ 05:50 AM
    Location
    PNW
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Colonial Germanic
    Ancestry
    Continental Europe and the British Isles. [Norway, Scotland and the former Hapsburg Empire]
    Politics
    Paleo-Liberalism
    Religion
    Protestant [Agnostic]
    Age
    20
    Gender
    Posts
    408
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Æmeric View Post
    Think of it this way: Should the childless have to pay taxes that go towards supporting statefunded schools? Is it fair that people with children get extra benefits in the form of tax credits/deductions or outright payments, which means the childless must make up the difference in higher taxes?

    Some societies get along without state pension systems, Japan for one & China has decided not to burden itself with one. The welfare state is very expensive & is inept in adminstration. The tax burden of supporting the modern welfare state has as much to do with depressed TFRs as the promise of the state supported pensions in old age. The Western welfare state is nothing more then a ponzi scheme that will come crashing down eventually. The reason the EU needs 50 million immgrants is to support its pension system.

    Needs?
    Wants. We don't use the pension argument in the United States. It's mainly the ''Jobs that Americans Refuse to do". I'm afraid if the pension crisis (regardless if it is real or not) didn't exist, Europe would just come up with another argument to justify a poor immigration; or rather a lack thereof; policy.
    Last edited by TheGreatest; 12-27-2008 at 05:23 PM.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last Online
    04-07-2011 @ 09:25 PM
    Location
    Adolfsfors
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Soviet
    Country
    Georgia
    Religion
    Stalinism
    Gender
    Posts
    126
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Definitively not! This will only hurt white retired people, and make more money to the "quantity over quality"-immigrants. And I bet that's what they're planning in Germany, to only make the turks applicable for state pensions. That's the only thing we can offer the elders who have worked so hard for us, and now they want to take it away from them, in favour of those who's only achievement is having 20 bastard kids.

    But, if only people who are parents to atleast two children and are white would receive pensions, I'm all for that.

  8. #8
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Groenewolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Death
    Ethnicity
    Death
    Country
    Netherlands
    Age
    99
    Gender
    Posts
    3,347
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 27
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheGreatest View Post
    Needs?
    Wants. We don't use the pension argument in the United States. It's mainly the ''Jobs that Americans Refuse to do".
    Actualy here in the Netherlands both arguments are used. So yes, they probaly would come with some other retoric to say why we need more.

  9. #9
    Just Myself Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Skandi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last Online
    05-22-2023 @ 02:02 PM
    Location
    a rock
    Meta-Ethnicity
    CeltoGermanic
    Ethnicity
    igneous
    Ancestry
    Lewisian gneiss
    Country
    Denmark
    Taxonomy
    Pebble
    Politics
    it's MY rock
    Religion
    Heathen
    Gender
    Posts
    2,668
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 23
    Given: 1

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    How would you decide who had been able too and who hadn't? and you would then get people having children without having a partner just to get a pension. Not only this but you could only really run this for women not men. give benifits for familys with many children, or those that have worked for the state, (and I don't mean petty beurocrats I mean Fire/police/army etc) But there is no way to penalise people without children that would not cause more problems than it solved.

    Create a society where you can aford to run a household on one basic income and then responicble people will also breed.

  10. #10
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Absinthe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Krisenland Griechenland
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Psychoactive
    Ethnicity
    Green ;)
    Taxonomy
    Artemisia absinthium
    Religion
    Obscure
    Age
    33
    Gender
    Posts
    8,317
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 351
    Given: 49

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thrymheim View Post
    Create a society where you can aford to run a household on one basic income and then responicble people will also breed.
    Amen. up

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •