5
The thought of "transwomen"--who are, as far as I am concerned, generally males pretending to be women because they are mentally disturbed--sufficiently passable for the opposite gender (due to natural unusually feminine physiology and/or hormone replacement therapy and plastic surgery) deceiving heterosexual males who would never dream of committing the act of male-on-male sodomy into sleeping with them is, to me, nowt short of revolting.
Ponder this case,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Gwen_Araujo
the "unlawful" murder of a self-appointed "woman" who, in essence, raped two of her eventual killers (assuming that the official narrative can be trusted) isn't, the way I see it, an entirely unreasonable reaction. If someone were to rape my mother or sister, I would follow them to the end of the Earth--if so required--to ensure that their lives come to an end.
Why ought pretending to be a woman and tricking heterosexual men into sleeping with one to be interpreted with any more leniency than is "rape" as commonly envisaged? I do not support the above "murder", but I can certainly sympathise with the victims [those who were raped]. Equally, I would definitely sympathise with a woman who killed her rapist in a fit of post-traumatic angst.
I would like to invite you all (the ones with functioning brains, at any rate) to civil, reason-guided discourse on the subject.
Bookmarks