0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,614 Given: 4,516 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 40,070 Given: 10,740 |
Assuming Normans had little influence, then Sicilians would have been lighter prior to Greek and Phoenician settlement, since Italic would have made up a greater proportion of ancestry before then, even though they arrived when Neolithic peoples were already there.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,614 Given: 4,516 |
I think most Euro populations were lighter then. Italy got darker when the Easterners started to arrive in numbers.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,687 Given: 1,192 |
I for one feel that the IE invasion of Italy was at a far more remote point in time, c. 3400 BC when the Kurgan stone warrior chief stelae appear in Northern Italy. Under this scenario, and by the time historically known Italics emerge, they thus would have looked standard Dinaro-Med. due to intermarrage with more 'local' elements in Italy. Ergo, more Northern traits in Palermo would reflect IMO more recent gene flow into the area which Norman conquest would fulfill here quite well.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 209 Given: 189 |
Not all European blonds or near-blonds are Nordic.
Many are Borreby or a certain type of Alpine.
I doubt if ANYWHERE in Italy outside the South Tyrol has as much as 7 to 9 pc per cent of tall, long-headed Nordics.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 253 Given: 90 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 40,070 Given: 10,740 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks