2
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...yWTVheVE#gid=0
I only included the large percentages, i.e. I am not listing Nilotic, Cushitic, etc.
All of the scores are fairly similar, i.e. within 2% of one another. Thus, I am convinced that Sicily is fairly homogenous genetically except for minor pushes and pulls in each direction.
Historically, this is the presence in each area:
Western: Phoenicians, Moors/Arabs, Carthaginians, Normans, and an Anatolian group called Elymians
Central: Isolated with minor Greek and Carthaginian influences
South: Greeks
WEST SICILIAN (Palermo, Trapani):
North European: 9.76%
Caucasus-Near Eastern: 33.02%
North African: 3.29%
Gedrosia-Caucasian: 10.98%
Southwest European: 26.36%
Arabic: 8.58%
CENTER SICILIAN (Enna, Caltanissetta):
North European: 7.35%
Caucasus-Near Eastern: 35.39%
North African: 2.90%
Caucasus-Gedrosia: 9.39%
Southwest European: 25.37%
Arabic: 6.73%
SOUTH SICILIAN (Coastal Agrigento, Caltanissetta, and Ragusa):
North European: 8.67%
Caucasus-Near Eastern: 34.80%
North African: 3.03%
Caucasus-Gedrosia: 10.83%
Southwest European: 27.20%
Arabic: 8.01%
Each component in order from greatest to least within Sicily:
North European: West, South, Center (This makes sense because of Normans in Palermo)
Caucasus: Center, South, West (This makes sense if you assume central Sicily preserved the Neolithic genes)
North African: West, South, Center (This makes sense given where the Moorish influence was in the west)
Gedrosia: West, South, Center (This makes sense since the Elymians were Armenian-like)
SW European: South, West, Center (I couldn't say.. SW Europeans never were in Sicily)
Arabic: West, South, Center (This makes sense, again because of the west having more Arabic influence)
Bookmarks