Hairy & Anthropology

[Pallantides]

I have recently read a study, which claimed that Northern Europeans are the least hairy people in Europe.

I have noticed that the fairer ones are usually the least hairy while the darker ones tend to have more and darker hair on arms, legs and chest.

[Ibericus]

I have noticed that the fairer ones are usually the least hairy while the darker ones tend to have more and darker hair on arms, legs and chest.

Maybe because their hair is fair, and thus less visible...

[Pallantides]

Maybe because their hair is fair, and thus less visible...

Not really, I know some guys who are very "Nordic" looking who have light blond hair and they literally have no chest hair only and faint hair on their legs and arms ... you can tell when someone has little to no body hair.

[Cail]

I have noticed that the fairer ones are usually the least hairy while the darker ones tend to have more and darker hair on arms, legs and chest.

I guess it depends. For example me, I have relatively little chest hair, but my legs and arms are like ape's. If i wasn't blond, you'd think i was a chimp if you saw my arms.

[Ibericus]

I guess it depends. For example me, I have relatively little chest hair, but my legs and arms are like ape's. If i wasn't blond, you'd think i was a chimp if you saw my arms.

Yes. Like this guy, if he was black haired instead of blonde, look his legs :

[Truth Seeker]

To be precise, Northern Near Easterners, as I said before. So Armenoids and Iranids.

If you go away from there, in EVERY direction, the hairiness as a tendency decreases.

F.e. Arabids and more Southern Eastern Mediterranids too are already less hairy than the Caucasian people. The Caucasian area is really a centre of hairiness.

And of course, the Cromagnoids in the North West too are more hairy, though having a rather low Near Eastern input.

So it's mostly up to cold adapted and Mongoloid inspired forms to be "less hairy" - if excluding feminised and very infantile variants.

The Northern Near Eastern influence definitely entered Europe and formed a large portion of its population probably, some things are unclear yet, yDNA is interesting in this regard too. Thats also a reason why Dinarids might be more hairy or those Mediterranids closer to the Caucasian centre of hairiness, like the ones from Bulgaria, in comparison to those in Iberia.

The incidence of synophrys (monobrows/unibrows) is also higher in the most hairy racial forms and can be used for comparison.

At the same time certain variants have unibrows though being less hairy otherwise. But in Europeans it is usually an indicator, which is even less dependent on the individual's sex type in comparison or careful inspection of a person...

Agrippa I don't have a unibrow. Is a unibrow associated with any type?

I have noticed that the fairer ones are usually the least hairy while the darker ones tend to have more and darker hair on arms, legs and chest.

I have Celtic skin. My cousin has red hair.

Yes. Like this guy, if he was black haired instead of blonde, look his legs :

I have a friend whos mom immigrated from Germany and whos dad is German American in the military. He was tall and blond and slim like that guy. I never realized how hairy his arms were until he got a tan in the summer.

[Agrippa]

Agrippa I don't have a unibrow. Is a unibrow associated with any type?

Only by frequency, so simple put some types have more individuals with an unibrow than others. Especially notable are Armenoid and Iranid, secondarily Dinarid and Nordindid, so the hairist Europid types...

Ainuids too are very hairy and have it quite often as well.

[Toni]

Race doesn't exist.

[Agrippa]

Race doesn't exist.

Inheritable traits and trait combination of a racial character exist, which is the really important point, whether you call that race or xy is secondary.

[Ibericus]

Race doesn't exist.

Prove it.