0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,828 Given: 1,086 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,275 Given: 433 |
So, all of Scandinavia is more Asian by DNA than Poland.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,828 Given: 1,086 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,724 Given: 2,012 |
That East Asian just keeps on spreading.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,828 Given: 1,086 |
Indeed, this map needs to get edited again, I found a Hustul dude who is 3-4%:
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/sho...=1#post1225413
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,803 Given: 288 |
No idea why Maciamo keeps on relying on the obsolete Dodecad runs but not on the Eurogenes project or the more recent globe4 run of the dodecad. I think he's in denial of his own East Asian ancestry.
East Eurasian ancestry should be around or over 10% in Northern Europe, from Britain to Poland. Of course there is a subtle difference between East Asian and North Asian ancestry but he should be posting both to be fair, not just East Asian.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 160 Given: 296 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,275 Given: 433 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,275 Given: 433 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 11,269 Given: 13,631 |
So? If we are to judge by "that research paper" East-Eurasian ancestry should be also present in southern Europe albeit in lower percentages. It is not the point here if true to show such very old breakdown, probably older than mesolithic times.
And he did not post just East Asian only, but obviously in East Asian component he probably included all Far Eastern components since nobody in Europe scores this high "East Asian", but only Syberian (North Asian).
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks