I ask this question because there have been some posts touching on the subject.
What do you define as art and what not?
Why would Jackson Pollock or Andy Warhol, for example, be considered as lesser artists that Leonardo da Vinci?
What makes Neoclassical art, for example, worth more than dadaist art?
My husband has a degree in Visual Art and Art History and we have had this discussion on many occassions, and argued about it too. In my eyes, Leonardo da Vinci is a greater artist than Andy Warhol. I find Andy Warhol's stuff ridiculously overrated, but that's just my opinion.
What are your views on the matter? I'm just using Warhol and Da Vinci as an example but there are hundreds of other artists who one can use.
What makes this art? And not the lower picture?
Bookmarks