Eurogenes K13

[Vesuvian Sky]

Did my DNA get mixed up w/ someone else's?

[poiuytrewq0987]

Did my DNA get mixed up w/ someone else's?

North European grouping is too broad since there is a quite bit of difference between West Europeans and East Europeans.

My Dodecad V3 result looks way closer to reality. It's only because it breaks down the North European into West and East European. I'll post it. And you should too, to compare.

My V3

General European: 83.95%
Inbetween European and Asian (West Asian): 12.54%
Asian: 3.28%
African: 0.18%

[Oneeye]

[Vesuvian Sky]

North European grouping is too broad since there is a quite bit of difference between West Europeans and East Europeans.

My Dodecad V3 result looks way closer to reality. It's only because it breaks down the North European into West and East European. I'll post it. And you should too, to compare.

My V3

General European: 83.95%
Inbetween European and Asian (West Asian): 12.54%
Asian: 3.28%
African: 0.18%

I always felt that Eurogenes past K-9 interpretations were highly sketchy. Your results on Dodecad plus mine in comparison to what Doug McDonald said for me helps further this point.

I've been wondering about Bulgarian DNA for a while myself and Dodecad classes cleany it appears for you since your East European is well represented in addition to a North East Asian component (Harja Turan!) and of course other components that one would expect to find in the Balkans.

Only thing that was messed up for me was the Oracles on Dodecad V3. Eurogenes actually gave better results on this matter.

Ah! You came out more Med. then me.

[Atlantic Islander]

Do any of you have results from the original K=13 spreadsheet?

[Atlantic Islander]

It's interesting that some people find V3 to be more accurate, I think my percentages are good, but half the time it can't figure out if I'm Portuguese or French - which makes no sense.

[Vesuvian Sky]

Do any of you have results from the original K=13 spreadsheet?

Oh do you mean here:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...3V0JXQ3c#gid=0

It's interesting that some people find V3 to be more accurate, I think my percentages are good, but half the time it can't figure out if I'm Portuguese or French - which makes no sense.

Yeah you mean on the Oracles? Yeah my Oracle was all screwed up as well for that.

[Atlantic Islander]

Here's my Dodecad V3 results.

Gedmatch



Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 West_European 39.48%
2 Mediterranean 34.51%
3 West_Asian 7.89%
4 Southwest_Asian 5.97%
5 Northwest_African 4.99%
6 East_European 4.25%
7 East_African 1.29%
8 Neo_African 0.78%
9 Southeast_Asian 0.42%
10 Palaeo_African 0.3%
11 Northeast_Asian 0.14%

From the V3 spreadsheet:

West_European 39.1%
Mediterranean 34.8%
West_Asian 7.1%
Southwest_Asian 5.9%
Northwest_African 5.3%
East_European 4.6%
East_African 1.8%
Neo_African 0.6%
Southeast_Asian 0.5%
Northeast_Asian 0.2%
Palaeo_African 0%

[Atlantic Islander]

Oh do you mean here:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...3V0JXQ3c#gid=0

Yes.

Yeah you mean on the Oracles? Yeah my Oracle was all screwed up as well for that.

And yes.

It's also the only calculator that doesn't say Portuguese in oracle-x:

Pct. Calc. Option 1

1 French_Basque 68.88%
2 Adygei 8.95%
3 Saudis 6.43%
4 Mozabite 5.28%
5 Lithuanian 4.98%
6 Algeria 2.55%
7 Cypriots 1.51%
8 East_African 1.31%
9 Iban 0.11%
10 Morocco_S 0.00%

Pct. Calc. Option 2

0 Unable to determine 0.07%
1 French_Basque 34.52%
2 Spaniards 23.04%
3 Adygei 8.02%
4 Spanish 6.45%
5 Saudis 6.08%
6 Mozabite 5.65%
7 Lithuanian 4.58%
8 Norwegian 4.58%
9 Sardinian 4.18%
10 Ethiopian_Jews 2.84%

[Vesuvian Sky]

Here's my Dodecad V3 results.

Its interesting how Iberians have less ME components then other Meds. The archaeology of Iberia has always been interpreted regarding Neolithization as having wayward agriculturalists originally from the ME only settling in peripheral zones yet leaving a mostly acculturating effect on the locals of the peninsula.

Gives credence to this aDNA study on Iberian mtDNA:

http://www.plosone.org/article/info:...l.pone.0034417

But in other words, Iberia represents a case of marco-regional acculturation for the spread of agriculture where it was mostly adopted and immigrating farmers fewer in number. This of course contrasts starkly to what we see with the Neolithization of the Italian peninsula and Balkans with the Cardial Ware and Starcevo Koros Cris cultural horizons respectively.

edit: my results are all from Gedmatch. I was unaware there was a different way of going about getting the results. How does one get on the spreadsheets and how do they differ in results?