3


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 4,197/173 Given: 3,869/18 |




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 23,084/192 Given: 56,836/274 |





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 39,111/121 Given: 18,812/0 |
Atlantic_Baltic 70.31%
Caucasus_Gedrosia 13.66%
Southern 9.01%
African 2.43%
East_Asian 1.40%
Australasian 1.18%
Amerindian 0.91%
South_Asian 0.90%
Siberian 0.20%
![]()

| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,688/12 Given: 1,192/5 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,138/362 Given: 337/30 |



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,470/8 Given: 1,578/18 |
Your Atlantic-Baltic is higher than Dodecad Greek average and your general score's very close to iNird Albanian
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...jTVdfZEE#gid=0


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,058/134 Given: 5,444/57 |
My Dodecad World9 results from GEDmatch. As expected the Atlantic_Baltic component dominates my results.
Population
Amerindian 1.50%
East_Asian -
African 0.19%
Atlantic_Baltic 64.11%
Australasian 0.73%
Siberian 2.30%
Caucasus_Gedrosia 16.27%
Southern 14.84%
South_Asian -
Here is what Dienekes himself said to me about the origins of the Atlantic_Baltic component.
''Atlantic_Baltic is a component that reaches its highest levels in the far edge of Europe, i.e., the Atlantic facade and the Baltic area. My analysis of ancient European hunter-gatherers from Iberia and Sweden has shown them to belong ~100% in this component, indicating that it incorporate (while not identical to) the legacy of pre-Neolithic Europe.''
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Bookmarks