North European ADMIXTURE Component From Eurogenes And Dodecad

[Black Wolf]

Cuz this is pseudoscience speculation, and nothing more

No it is not. You are a Hungarian correct? If so who do you think the vast majority of your ancestors are? Native Central Europeans who at one point in the past spoke Indo-European languages and at one point switched to speaking Uralic languages or were they always all just Uralic speakers?

[robar]

No it is not. You are a Hungarian correct? If so who do you think the vast majority of your ancestors are? Native Central Europeans who at one point in the past spoke Indo-European languages and at one point switched to speaking Uralic languages or were they always all just Uralic speakers?

and the wide majority of your ancestors spoke a diferent language, and language group.., and adding y-dna markers to specific languages etc is pseudoscience

[Black Wolf]

lol Hungarians actually score even less than 1% Siberian in the Dodecad globe13 analysis. The average is only 0.8%.

[robar]

lol Hungarians actually score even less than 1% Siberian in the Dodecad globe13 analysis. The average is only 0.8%.

And?

[Black Wolf]

and the wide majority of your ancestors spoke a diferent language, and language group.., and adding y-dna markers to specific languages etc is pseudoscience

Sounds to me like you are a pseudoscientist. We are not even talking about Y-DNA markers/haplogroups here really. Educate yourself a bit about a topic before you jump in.

[Black Wolf]

And?

You barely have any Siberian like genetic ancestry.

[robar]

You barely have any Siberian like genetic ancestry.

[Black Wolf]

You list your ancestry as being Siberian in your profile there. If you truly are a Hungarian you should barely have any Siberian like genetic ancestry. You are genetically a Central European pretty much.

[Black Wolf]

robar is a Hungarian and thinks he is a Siberian...What a joke lol!

[Argang]

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...yWTVheVE#gid=1

The MDLP K27 test seems to split the North European hunter-gatherer component in two, a La Brana branch (meaning north euro component in La Brana sample in the test is purely Balto-Finnic) and a Swedish Mesolithic branch (all North European in this sample is NE-Baltic). According to the Fst these are the two most related components in the analysis, and their combined values in population averages are highest in Baltics and Finland. The difference is that the Balto-Finnic (La Brana) peaks in the north and the North European Baltic in the south.

Another point of note is that Sami have less of the Balto-Finnic component here than La Brana or Finns, so it can't be exactly the same as North European Mesolithic from World-22.