1
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 5,168/824 Given: 4,910/549 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 5,569/884 Given: 2,481/727 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 7,549/104 Given: 6,832/203 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 5,569/884 Given: 2,481/727 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 1,962/623 Given: 1,438/983 |
After 2 hours of searching on google =))))))) You are pathetic.
The Romanian language has been denoted "Daco-Romanian" by some scholars because it derives from late Latin superimposed on a Dacian substratum, and evolved in the Roman colony of Dacia between AD 106 and 275.[192] Modern Romanian may contain 160–170 words of Dacian origin. By comparison, modern French, according to Bulei, has approximately 180 words of Celtic origin.[193]The Celtic origin of the French substratum is certain, as the Celtic languages are abundantly documented, whereas the Dacian origin of Romanian words is in most cases speculative.
It is also argued that the Dacian language may form the substratum of the Proto-Romanian language, which developed from the Vulgar Latin spoken in the Balkans north of the Jirecek line, which roughly divides Latin influence from Greek influence. About 300 words in Eastern Romance languages, Daco-Romanian, Aromanian, Megleno-Romanian, Istro-Romanian, may derive from Dacian, and many of these show a satem-reflex.[citation needed] Whether Dacian forms the substratum of Proto-Romanian is disputed, yet this theory does not rely only on the Romanisation having occurred in Roman Dacia, as Dacian was also spoken in Moesia and northern Dardania. Moesia was conquered by the Romans more than a century before Dacia, and its Latinity is confirmed by Christian sources.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 938/160 Given: 1,558/465 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 7,549/104 Given: 6,832/203 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 7,549/104 Given: 6,832/203 |
I made the thread peaceful
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks