2


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 10/0 Given: 0/0 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 10/0 Given: 0/0 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 10/0 Given: 0/0 |



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 471/8 Given: 523/7 |
I (FI32) got this kind of results from MDLP K=5:
MDLP K=5 Oracle X "Pct. Calc. Option 1
Admix Results:
# Population Percent
1 East_Eurasian 13.49
2 West_Eurasian 65.41
3 Caucasian 3.11
4 South_Asian 0.98
5 Paleo_mediterranean 17.00
Pct. Calc. Option 1
1 KRL 88.21%
2 SRD 6.28%
3 HKS 3.00%
4 TTR 1.65%
5 BLG 0.58%
6 KSV 0.24%
7 MNT 0.03%
8 MCD 0.01%
9 UZ 0.00%
10 RMN 0.00%
My ancestry is from Eastern Finland from both sides.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 10/0 Given: 0/0 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 10/0 Given: 0/0 |
This particular analysis is now abit outdated. I have done new analysis separately of the La Braņa 1 and 2. However as I learn more and got some feedback from the Chromopainter-Finestructure authors suggesting the most recent analysis I did may not be entirely correct either. So I will likely have to redo all the ancient genomes again following strictly the recommendations from the authors.



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 557/13 Given: 2/0 |
Anders has done a revised analysis on La Braņa using the new sequence.
On the other hand the unlinked Finestructure analysis shows what we already know (La Braņa is closest to Northeast Europeans in ancient ancestry, clusters with Finns in unlinked model), but a linked analysis also shows it has genealogical continuity with populations like Basques and Northwest Europeans with whom it clusters in that analysis.
As we can see the different models appear to give different results and its due to that in geneology the La Braņa 1 closest to Basque, Sardinians and Western Europeans but in ancient ancestry closest to Finns and Saamis. The clustering in geneology with Basque, Sardinians and Western Europeans in the linked model make sense as the La Braņa 1 individual was found in today northern Spain. This means that the La Braņa 1 like haplotypes is still much present among Western Europeans of today suggesting continuity in the autosomes.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 18/0 Given: 10/0 |
I am new to this... Which is the best calculator? I get mixed results from different calcs on GEDmatch and Ancestry.







| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 145/0 Given: 88/6 |
Karen, tray K-36 Eurogenes. It the best fore european.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 18/0 Given: 10/0 |
Thank you, Stanislav.
Here is my K36:
Population
Amerindian 0.23%
Arabian -
Armenian -
Basque 2.65%
Central_African -
Central_Euro 6.75%
East_African -
East_Asian -
East_Balkan 0.43%
East_Central_Asian -
East_Central_Euro 4.28%
East_Med -
Eastern_Euro 6.20%
Fennoscandian 5.53%
French 7.58%
Iberian 10.67%
Indo-Chinese -
Italian 7.97%
Malayan -
Near_Eastern -
North_African -
North_Atlantic 21.43%
North_Caucasian 1.76%
North_Sea 18.39%
Northeast_African -
Oceanian 0.39%
Omotic -
Pygmy 0.70%
Siberian -
South_Asian -
South_Central_Asian 3.03%
South_Chinese -
Volga-Ural -
West_African 0.44%
West_Caucasian -
West_Med 1.57%
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks