0


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,058/134 Given: 5,444/57 |

| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,146/47 Given: 0/0 |
Almost certainly. Maybe some contribution from Anatolia or nearby, but I don't think there's any debating some of the UHG has to be Balkan.
..Also I think someone forgot to feed the hamsters...this site is slow as shit right now.
Me: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1ym...QU7rnlw/videos
Embedding Attachments: http://www.theapricity.com/forum/att...?attachmentid=
I'll make your poems into songs
Number of times this site has crashed my browser (as of 10/16/2014): 8


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,058/134 Given: 5,444/57 |
Polako has said that he thinks the WHG-UHG component may have been present among the earliest farmers of the Fertile Crescent in minority amounts. This would be from the UHG part of this composite component of course. I don't know about this though as UHG could have come to these West Asian and Middle Eastern populations later with migrations from west Anatolia or the Balkans. It is not really high at all in any groups native to that area of the world. Of course we need ancient DNA from the Middle East to prove any of this.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 141/21 Given: 192/58 |
WHG-UHG 54.51%
ENF 28.03%
ANE 14.09%
ASE 1.62%
East_African 0.83%
East_Eurasian 0.53%
West_African 0.38%


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 208/60 Given: 139/50 |




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 23,084/192 Given: 56,836/274 |



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 19,923/84 Given: 5,895/35 |



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 19,923/84 Given: 5,895/35 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 208/60 Given: 139/50 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 208/60 Given: 139/50 |
Also North African isn't present on these calculators so that would probably be the reason. Whenever North African is an option East African always disappears so I doubt it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks