3


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3,858/405 Given: 1,530/306 |
My fat, buttlicking ugly Semite friend, read my post again. --> http://www.theapricity.com/forum/sho...=1#post3294323
Sakas (Massagetae) were called Turanian (an Iranic term) by Iranians, not by Turanists you idiot. Scythians were Indo-European speaking (still disputed though), but later absorbed into the culture and identity of incoming Turkic tribes. What we are saying is Central Asian Turks are genetically & culturally more related to Saka/Scythian/Massagetae than modern Iranians or Slavs are.






| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,404/770 Given: 6,855/520 |






| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 29,760/1,198 Given: 24,478/603 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3,858/405 Given: 1,530/306 |






| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 29,760/1,198 Given: 24,478/603 |
I also heard that blacks claim that Egypt is called Kemet which means black land, so it means that Egyptians were originally black right? Oh, and cannanites, greeks, persians, phoenicians, sumerians and etc were Turkic as well *sarcasm*. Scythians, Sarmatians, Bactrians, Sogdians and etc werent Turkic, and they are ethnically Aryans, deal with it.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 747/166 Given: 1,145/208 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 2,833/1,047 Given: 1,720/1,162 |






| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,404/770 Given: 6,855/520 |






| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 29,760/1,198 Given: 24,478/603 |
Well, she is living in Krgyzstan with my uncle, and she told me that most people there dont believe in that nonsense, and they see Turks like any other foreign people. Go there and see for yourself if you dont believe me. And btw, who gave you the right to take other people's culture and heritage away from them? You want to be a proud mongol then its fine with me, but dont try to Turanize every civilization you see please.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks